On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Do Zabbix or Zenoss allow for this sort of testing that Nagios has?
>> OK, thanks. I'll dig more into passive checks
>>
>
> I think its the active tests you are looking for ( tests run from the
> zabbix-server rather than on the agent
On 12/17/2011 01:25 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
>>> Do Zabbix or Zenoss allow for this sort of testing that Nagios has?
> OK, thanks. I'll dig more into passive checks
>
I think its the active tests you are looking for ( tests run from the
zabbix-server rather than on the agent ). Easy one to start wi
> > Do Zabbix or Zenoss allow for this sort of testing that Nagios has?
>
> yes.
>
OK, thanks. I'll dig more into passive checks
--
“Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV”
- Michael Pollan, author of "In Defense of Food"
___
C
On 12/16/2011 04:19 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
> At the base of what I see so far, Zabbix is only able to monitor devices
> that have the Zabbix agent on it - is that correct?
not at all. Zabbix can do active and passive tests, it can even proxy
them via relays and can aggregate results based on condit
On 16 December 2011 16:19, Alan McKay wrote:
>
> But I'm still left wondering whether I should fall back to Nagios.
If you're considering that then also have a look at Opsview:
http://www.opsview.com/community/compare-opsview
___
CentOS mailing list
Cen
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
>> > Thoughts form anyone on any of this?
>>
>> Network monitoring is not trivial no matter what tool you use. Pick
>> something that you trust to scale to the proportions you will need so
>> you don't do a lot of work and then hit a wall. And
> > Thoughts form anyone on any of this?
>
> Network monitoring is not trivial no matter what tool you use. Pick
> something that you trust to scale to the proportions you will need so
> you don't do a lot of work and then hit a wall. And if you have a
> lot of systems, avoid anything that needs
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Alan McKay wrote:
>
> On the one hand I like having an agent on the remove device since it allows
> you to have functionality that is more purpose-driven to what we are trying
> to do. On the other hand, what above devices that cannot run the agent?
> e.g. moni
OK, I've had a Zabbix and a Zenoss server running now for 2 or 3 days and
would like to morph this thread into a discussion of what each of these
systems can and cannot do.
At the base of what I see so far, Zabbix is only able to monitor devices
that have the Zabbix agent on it - is that correct?
On 12/13/2011 03:28 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
> I am just trying out Zabbix and I have to say it sure is easy to set
> up (once you get beyond a few minor quirks). I'm pretty impressed so
> far with my evaluation.
>
I've use zabbix quite extensively over the last 2 odd years ( we even
use Zabbix to
I am just trying out Zabbix and I have to say it sure is easy to set
up (once you get beyond a few minor quirks). I'm pretty impressed so
far with my evaluation.
--
“Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV”
- Michael Pollan, author of "In Defense of Food"
_
ssage -
> From: m...@tdiehl.org
> To: "CentOS mailing list"
> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 9:53:54 AM
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Monitoring services
>
> On Tue, 29 Nov 2011, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
>
> > Greetings,
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
>> On Sun, 27 Nov 2011, Kenneth Porter wrote:
>>
>>> What's available to remotely monitor services?
>
> I have deployed Zabbix successfully to remotely monitor about 240+
> ge
Greetings,
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Nov 2011, Kenneth Porter wrote:
>
>> What's available to remotely monitor services?
I have deployed Zabbix successfully to remotely monitor about 240+
geographically distributed locations connected by ADSSL links (IOW
On Sun, 27 Nov 2011, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> What's available to remotely monitor services? What I'd like is
> something that can run scripts for each service to connect to a port
> and verify that it's up, and then send me an SMS message (phone
> text) to let me know which, if any, are down.
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> What's available to remotely monitor services? What I'd like is something
> that can run scripts for each service to connect to a port and verify that
> it's up, and then send me an SMS message (phone text) to let me know which,
> if any, ar
You can try zabbix
www.zabbix.com
On 11/27/2011 08:01 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> What's available to remotely monitor services? What I'd like is something
> that can run scripts for each service to connect to a port and verify that
> it's up, and then send me an SMS message (phone text) to let m
>Nagios is probably the most popular, and is pretty powerful and
>relatively easy to write your own plugins for.
>
>I have to look at this in my new job in the next month or so. I'm
>going to have a look at Zenoss and if that does not pan out and
>nothing else turns up I'll fall back to Nagios.
>
On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 20:56 -0500, Alan McKay wrote:
> Nagios is probably the most popular, and is pretty powerful and
> relatively easy to write your own plugins for.
>
> I have to look at this in my new job in the next month or so. I'm
> going to have a look at Zenoss and if that does not pan o
Nagios is probably the most popular, and is pretty powerful and
relatively easy to write your own plugins for.
I have to look at this in my new job in the next month or so. I'm
going to have a look at Zenoss and if that does not pan out and
nothing else turns up I'll fall back to Nagios.
Really
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 18:01, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> What's available to remotely monitor services? What I'd like is something
> that can run scripts for each service to connect to a port and verify that
> it's up, and then send me an SMS message (phone text) to let me know which,
> if any, are
--On Sunday, November 27, 2011 4:22 PM -0700 Corey Henderson
wrote:
> None that I'm aware of. If you're going to write one, keep in mind that
> some init scripts list as "on" in chkconfig and run on boot but don't
> actually launch a process.
True. I was thinking that a script could run "chkcon
On 11/27/2011 4:01 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> What's available to remotely monitor services? What I'd like is something
> that can run scripts for each service to connect to a port and verify that
> it's up, and then send me an SMS message (phone text) to let me know which,
> if any, are down.
>
What's available to remotely monitor services? What I'd like is something
that can run scripts for each service to connect to a port and verify that
it's up, and then send me an SMS message (phone text) to let me know which,
if any, are down.
Also, does a script exist that checks all the servic
24 matches
Mail list logo