John R Pierce wrote:
Les Mikesell wrote:
I mostly use VMware Server, but the systems were set up before the ESXi product
was free. Starting over, I'd install ESXi on the bare metal, then whatever you
want as guests. You do need a windows machines to run the console client for
Les Mikesell wrote:
> I mostly use VMware Server, but the systems were set up before the ESXi
> product
> was free. Starting over, I'd install ESXi on the bare metal, then whatever
> you
> want as guests. You do need a windows machines to run the console client for
> ESXi, though.
>
vmw
David Milholen wrote:
> Ok,
> So the idea on VM is to have plenty of Drive space?
Not space so much as independently-seeking heads. Every process on every
virtual/real machine that shares a physical drive is going to have its own idea
about where the head is supposed to be at the moment and yo
Nate,
That pdf resolved a bunch of questions I had..
Thanks, now I have a focus and some new toys to play with.
I am going to configure a VM and have a snapshot of the Native QMT-PLUS
server and let the VM do all of the backups to the NAS.
If all goes well the goal will be to have a 2 machines an
David Milholen wrote:
> I have managed these for so long on just a couple of machines but
> technology is changing and we are growing as a company and I have heard
> and read great things that can be done with VM.
Really depends on how much usage the systems get, if you are migrating
from physical
Ok,
So the idea on VM is to have plenty of Drive space? Please excuse my
obvious lack of knowledge on VM but I am so old school just having a
single server with just a few drives only running a few
Apps like Httpd,mysqld,qmt-plus and dns.
I have managed these for so long on just a couple of mac
On 3/3/2010 2:40 PM, David Milholen wrote:
> For example if i have 2 ibm Eserver 326 with dual xeon 2.8ghz each with
> 2 sata 200Gb drives.
> how many virtual machines can be configured on those to run a couple of
> mail servers and some network monitoring like ntop/nagios
> possibly add domain hos
>For example if i have 2 ibm Eserver 326 with dual xeon 2.8ghz each with 2 sata
>200Gb drives.
Not much if there's any IO at all, those sata drives will not
do much for performance. I have a variety here of sata and SAS
and even on good controllers, the sata drives obviously just
don't handle mu
For example if i have 2 ibm Eserver 326 with dual xeon 2.8ghz each with
2 sata 200Gb drives.
how many virtual machines can be configured on those to run a couple of
mail servers and some network monitoring like ntop/nagios
possibly add domain hosting services on there also?
--dave
Les Mikese
David Milholen wrote:
> What are some min requirements for Hardware and what performance
> differences are there in just running another pid for an app?
That question is way too general to answer and also depends a bit on what VM
approach (xen/kvm/vmware server, vmware esxi) you use. As a rule
What are some min requirements for Hardware and what performance
differences are there in just running another pid for an app?
--
David Milholen
Project Engineer
501-318-1300
Wireless Etc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://list
11 matches
Mail list logo
