On 06/26/2013 07:52 AM, Phelps, Matt wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>> On 05/02/2013 10:50 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
>>> Johnny,
>>>
>>> there is someone here
>>>
>>> https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=227320
>>>
>>> who is willing and able to
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 05/02/2013 10:50 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> > Johnny,
> >
> > there is someone here
> >
> > https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=227320
> >
> > who is willing and able to help.
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:48 PM, J
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> Well, there are hobby users and there are real users. Google SHOULD
> understand the difference.
Welcome to the brave new World where Google is the new Microsoft.
Do you think if they cared about user feedback they would have left the
On 06/23/2013 04:59 AM, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote:
> On 08/06/13 06:27, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> We can not distribute the pepperflash or libpdf viewer from Google
> > Chrome due to licensing restrictions, but you can download these two
> > scripts from the github repo and run them either as root
On 08/06/13 06:27, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> We can not distribute the pepperflash or libpdf viewer from Google
> Chrome due to licensing restrictions, but you can download these two
> scripts from the github repo and run them either as root or as a
> user with sudo access to install those two lib
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> OK guys,
>
> Here is the test version of Chromium version 28 for CentOS-6 (the
> current beta release).
>
> http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/chromium/6/
>
>
Johnny,
Thanks for packaging Chromium for CentOS 6.
I'll second Scott's comment
On Fri, 07 Jun 2013 22:27:46 -0500
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 05/02/2013 10:50 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Johnny Hughes
> > wrote:
> >> On 04/15/2013 01:26 AM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> >>>
>
>
> OK guys,
>
> Here is the test version of Chromium v
On 06/08/2013 03:27 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 05/02/2013 10:50 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
Johnny,
there is someone here
https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=227320
who is willing and able to help.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 04/15/2013 01:26
On 05/02/2013 10:50 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> Johnny,
>
> there is someone here
>
> https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=227320
>
> who is willing and able to help.
>
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 04/15/2013 01:26 AM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
>>>
Johnny,
there is someone here
https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=227320
who is willing and able to help.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 04/15/2013 01:26 AM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
>> Is there any chance CentOS might add Chromium to extras repo? Se
On 04/15/2013 01:26 AM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> Is there any chance CentOS might add Chromium to extras repo? See below.
>
> Post from Hirakendu:
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/chromium-discuss/I_ZFDJqdiyA
>
> ---
> "I have put up some scripts for bui
Is there any chance CentOS might add Chromium to extras repo? See below.
Post from Hirakendu:
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/chromium-discuss/I_ZFDJqdiyA
---
"I have put up some scripts for building current Chromium versions (26
and 27) on EL 6 at
https
Update:
With Opera dropping Presto engine and following/forking Chrome and
with Chromium dropping support for CentOS that just leaves us with
only one main browser: Firefox ESR.
I commented asking for support past version 26. Got a reply,
"Note that these systems were never officially supported.
I'm bumping this thread in hopes some Googe/Chromium devs will realize
that GCC 4.7.2 is available for RHEL6. Please continue supporting
google-chrome for rhel/centos 6. Now that version 26 is stable we get
a warning message every time chrome is launched. "Google Chrome has
stopped updating ..."
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn <
denni...@conversis.de> wrote:
> On 02/12/2013 10:52 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> > On 2/12/2013 9:30 AM, SilverTip257 wrote:
> >> The Fedora Project [0] may maintain Chromium builds for EL6. I know
> that
> >> in the past they've maintained C
On 02/12/2013 12:20 PM, Gé Weijers wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Nux! wrote:
>
>> I tried building Chromium in the past for EL6 and I gave up as it was
>> too difficult for me. Of course someone else might succeed in doing so,
>> but even in that case, for how long can he/she keep up w
On 02/12/2013 10:52 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 2/12/2013 9:30 AM, SilverTip257 wrote:
>> The Fedora Project [0] may maintain Chromium builds for EL6. I know that
>> in the past they've maintained Chromium builds for Fedora.
>> It actually seems like someone [1] might be gearing up to do just th
On 2/12/2013 9:30 AM, SilverTip257 wrote:
> The Fedora Project [0] may maintain Chromium builds for EL6. I know that
> in the past they've maintained Chromium builds for Fedora.
> It actually seems like someone [1] might be gearing up to do just that for
> EL6.
if Chrome starts using functionalit
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:35:21AM -0800, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
>
> Just discovered that RH has provided a new developer toolchain a few
> weeks ago. GCC 4.7.2.
>
> http://red.ht/Uo9wej
>
> But it requires a developer subscription. Wondering if this might help
> the situation.
feel free to
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Gé Weijers wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Nux! wrote:
>
>> I tried building Chromium in the past for EL6 and I gave up as it was
>> too difficult for me. Of course someone else might succeed in doing so,
>> but even in that case, for how long can he/sh
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Nux! wrote:
> I tried building Chromium in the past for EL6 and I gave up as it was
> too difficult for me. Of course someone else might succeed in doing so,
> but even in that case, for how long can he/she keep up with backporting
> updates and so on?
>
It would
On 12.02.2013 01:14, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> https://plus.google.com/u/0/100132233764003563318/posts/Y1s6T44Soby
>
> Not 100% this is true but the problem apparently is that rhel6 uses an
> old version of gtk2.
>
> If this is true, then it affects my school and my students. I like
> google-chr
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> https://plus.google.com/u/0/100132233764003563318/posts/Y1s6T44Soby
>
> Not 100% this is true but the problem apparently is that rhel6 uses an
> old version of gtk2.
Update, I just read the issue is also C++11 and gcc 4.6. Apparently,
Ch
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
> https://plus.google.com/u/0/100132233764003563318/posts/Y1s6T44Soby
>
> Not 100% this is true but the problem apparently is that rhel6 uses an
> old version of gtk2.
>
No clue here. I don't run X on any of my production systems.
And Ce
https://plus.google.com/u/0/100132233764003563318/posts/Y1s6T44Soby
Not 100% this is true but the problem apparently is that rhel6 uses an
old version of gtk2.
If this is true, then it affects my school and my students. I like
google-chrome and it works very well with google services. I was
plan
25 matches
Mail list logo
