Re: [CentOS] Not - Re: New DNS server up and running

2013-02-21 Thread James Hogarth
On 21 February 2013 01:28, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote: It looks like no system, internal or external could access the DNS on my new server. IPTABLES was set for 53 both UDP and TCP. Firewall was OK. In fact a local system on the same subnet, thus NOT going through my

Re: [CentOS] Not - Re: New DNS server up and running

2013-02-21 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 02/21/2013 04:30 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On 21 February 2013 01:28, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote: It looks like no system, internal or external could access the DNS on my new server. IPTABLES was set for 53 both UDP and TCP. Firewall was OK. In fact a local system on the

Re: [CentOS] Not - Re: New DNS server up and running

2013-02-21 Thread James Hogarth
Great. I have to make notes on how to test about selinux reporting. audit2allow is useful to generate custom modules etc too - just don't be to blind in using them ;) other useful things are semange boolean and so on - centos has a good wiki page on selinux I assume that 'getenforce

Re: [CentOS] Not - Re: New DNS server up and running

2013-02-21 Thread Tony Molloy
On Thursday 21 February 2013 11:25:44 Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 02/21/2013 04:30 AM, James Hogarth wrote: On 21 February 2013 01:28, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote: It looks like no system, internal or external could access the DNS on my new server. IPTABLES was set for 53

Re: [CentOS] Not - Re: New DNS server up and running

2013-02-21 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 02/20/2013 08:28 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: It looks like no system, internal or external could access the DNS on my new server. IPTABLES was set for 53 both UDP and TCP. Firewall was OK. In fact a local system on the same subnet, thus NOT going through my firewall was denied access to

Re: [CentOS] Not - Re: New DNS server up and running

2013-02-21 Thread David G . Miller
Robert Moskowitz rgm@... writes: It looks like no system, internal or external could access the DNS on my new server. IPTABLES was set for 53 both UDP and TCP. Firewall was OK. In fact a local system on the same subnet, thus NOT going through my firewall was denied access to the

Re: [CentOS] Not - Re: New DNS server up and running

2013-02-21 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 02/21/2013 10:16 AM, David G. Miller wrote: Robert Moskowitz rgm@... writes: It looks like no system, internal or external could access the DNS on my new server. IPTABLES was set for 53 both UDP and TCP. Firewall was OK. In fact a local system on the same subnet, thus NOT going through

[CentOS] Not - Re: New DNS server up and running

2013-02-20 Thread Robert Moskowitz
It looks like no system, internal or external could access the DNS on my new server. IPTABLES was set for 53 both UDP and TCP. Firewall was OK. In fact a local system on the same subnet, thus NOT going through my firewall was denied access to the internal domain. Localhost of course works.

Re: [CentOS] Not - Re: New DNS server up and running

2013-02-20 Thread Eero Volotinen
How about checking logs ? Eero On Thursday, February 21, 2013, Robert Moskowitz wrote: It looks like no system, internal or external could access the DNS on my new server. IPTABLES was set for 53 both UDP and TCP. Firewall was OK. In fact a local system on the same subnet, thus NOT going