Benjamin Franz wrote:
> On 07/20/2010 10:57 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> In the last month - definitely after going to 5.5 - I've tried to fsck a
>> drive (340 days, or some such, unchecked). 960G RAID 5, I *think*,
>> possibly serial port attachment to a JetStore RAID array. Every time I
>> try,
Kwan Lowe wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:57 PM, wrote:
>
>> Note that my manager tried to run one on another server, also attached
>> to
>> a JetStore, and it also stopped at the exact same point. This has never
>> happened before, and fsck has handled these in the past.
>>
>> Anyone seen any
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:10:45AM -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote:
>
> I've seen e2fsck hang on large arrays (terabyte range) before,
> particularly if you have lots of hard links. It's a bug in fsck.
I've see that too. Glad it's not just on my systems ... sorta.
Whit
_
On 07/20/2010 10:57 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> In the last month - definitely after going to 5.5 - I've tried to fsck a
> drive (340 days, or some such, unchecked). 960G RAID 5, I *think*,
> possibly serial port attachment to a JetStore RAID array. Every time I
> try, it gets to 70.0%, and stops
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:57 PM, wrote:
> Note that my manager tried to run one on another server, also attached to
> a JetStore, and it also stopped at the exact same point. This has never
> happened before, and fsck has handled these in the past.
>
> Anyone seen anything like this, and/or have
In the last month - definitely after going to 5.5 - I've tried to fsck a
drive (340 days, or some such, unchecked). 960G RAID 5, I *think*,
possibly serial port attachment to a JetStore RAID array. Every time I
try, it gets to 70.0%, and stops. As in, I left it run last night, having
started it lat
6 matches
Mail list logo
