On 08/12/2015 09:21 AM, Richard wrote:
The long-and-short is that at some point someone/thing changed the
permissions (and maybe ownerships) on /var/log/httpd from the
defaults. [something that i would have assumed would have gone into
your change-management system.]
I'm willing to bet a fairly
> Date: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 09:28:59 -0400
> From: m.r...@5-cent.us
>
> Jonathan Billings wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:59:58PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> So, since I haven't yet found where /var/log/httpd is created,
>>> what would
>>> a default package make the ownership o
Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:59:58PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> So, since I haven't yet found where /var/log/httpd is created, what
>> would
>> a default package make the ownership of the directory? Does it expect it
>> to be apache:root?
>
> Just a data point:
>
> $
Am 12.08.2015 um 14:27 schrieb Jonathan Billings :
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:59:58PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> So, since I haven't yet found where /var/log/httpd is created, what would
>> a default package make the ownership of the directory? Does it expect it
>> to be apache:root?
>
>
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:59:58PM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> So, since I haven't yet found where /var/log/httpd is created, what would
> a default package make the ownership of the directory? Does it expect it
> to be apache:root?
Just a data point:
$ rpm -qp --qf='[%-11{filemodes:perms} %
On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 12:59 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> So, since I haven't yet found where /var/log/httpd is created, what would
> a default package make the ownership of the directory? Does it expect it
> to be apache:root?
On my C5.11 and C6.7 systems I get:-
: .l /var/log/|.g htt
24:
Richard wrote:
>> From: m.r...@5-cent.us
>> Richard wrote:
From: m.r...@5-cent.us
>>
Anyway, starting late last week, we found issues - as in, its
process, which runs under, and is started by, apache, was
suddenly pegging a CPU or so. Trying to stop httpd, that
worked... b
> Date: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 12:59:58 -0400
> From: m.r...@5-cent.us
>
> Richard wrote:
>>> From: m.r...@5-cent.us
>
>>> Anyway, starting late last week, we found issues - as in, its
>>> process, which runs under, and is started by, apache, was
>>> suddenly pegging a CPU or so. Trying to sto
Richard wrote:
>> From: m.r...@5-cent.us
>> Anyway, starting late last week, we found issues - as in, its
>> process, which runs under, and is started by, apache, was suddenly
>> pegging a CPU or so. Trying to stop httpd, that worked... but this
>> idiot process never did (and it's ugly to clean u
Original Message
> Date: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 11:43:21 -0400
> From: m.r...@5-cent.us
>
> We started updating via CR over a week ago, before 6.7 was
> official, and just today identified an issue For (alleged)
> security, the agency I work as a contractor for run
We started updating via CR over a week ago, before 6.7 was official, and
just today identified an issue For (alleged) security, the agency I
work as a contractor for runs SiteMinder, from CA.
#insert rant_against_CA.h
Anyway, starting late last week, we found issues - as in, its process,
whic
11 matches
Mail list logo
