On 14/01/2013 15:03, Arun Khan wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:14 AM, SilverTip257 wrote:
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 01/13/2013 10:15 AM, SilverTip257 wrote:
And it looks like their Atom E6xx CPU [0] supports Intel VT-x.
[0]
http://www.intel.com/p/en_US/embe
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 12:30 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 1/14/2013 2:54 PM, Natxo Asenjo wrote:
>> +1 on the setup. ,I have it with 10GB ram (I found out that this ram
>> block: Corsair XMS3 CMX8GX3M1A1333C9 also works in the HP N40L, so in
>> theory you could go to 16GB ram, 8GB cost me €30).
On 1/14/2013 2:54 PM, Natxo Asenjo wrote:
> +1 on the setup. ,I have it with 10GB ram (I found out that this ram
> block: Corsair XMS3 CMX8GX3M1A1333C9 also works in the HP N40L, so in
> theory you could go to 16GB ram, 8GB cost me €30).
yeah, I found out they could take 2 x 8GB about 30 hours aft
I would advise against using any cobalt hardware for anything even remotely
useful anymore. Other than the R550, everything else is so old as to be
ineffective.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Natxo Asenjo wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:03 PM, John R Pierce
> wrote:
> > On 1/14/2013 7:24
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:03 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 1/14/2013 7:24 AM, Phil Dobbin wrote:
>> Looking at the specs for N40Ls though put me off because they're rated
>> at 150W. Or am I missing something here?
>
> that may be the PSU rating, but 55W active is more typical, and thats
> with 4
On 01/14/2013 09:03 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 1/14/2013 7:24 AM, Phil Dobbin wrote:
>> Looking at the specs for N40Ls though put me off because they're rated
>> at 150W. Or am I missing something here?
>
> that may be the PSU rating, but 55W active is more typical, and thats
> with 4 3TB 720
On 1/14/2013 7:24 AM, Phil Dobbin wrote:
> Looking at the specs for N40Ls though put me off because they're rated
> at 150W. Or am I missing something here?
that may be the PSU rating, but 55W active is more typical, and thats
with 4 3TB 7200rpm SATA drives.
btw, those AMD Neo CPUs are no slouch
Am 14.01.2013 um 18:47 schrieb SilverTip257:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Matt Garman wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 8:55 AM, SilverTip257
>> wrote:
>>> I'm in search of some hardware that consumes a low amount of power for
>> use
>>> as a test-bed for Linux, various coding projects,
On 01/14/2013 11:20 AM, Matt Garman wrote:
> Of course, with these "real" CPUs (compared to e.g. Atom), power
> consumption will be much higher when loaded. But from what I've read,
> the "real" CPUs are actually better in the long run, because their
> computation efficiency is so much higher.
Maybe you have a look on my Serversystem, described on my Homepage
http://itnoobz.org/?page=Server. Unfortunately in German :(
It only consumes 28 W under high load.
Works perfectly till 6 Months.
Intel® D2500CCE inkl. Intel® Atom D2500
2x Kingston ValueRAM SO-DIMM 2 GB DDR3-1066
2x Western Digi
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Matt Garman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 8:55 AM, SilverTip257
> wrote:
> > I'm in search of some hardware that consumes a low amount of power for
> use
> > as a test-bed for Linux, various coding projects, and LAN services.
> >
> > 1) Low power consumption (
On 01/11/2013 09:55 AM, SilverTip257 wrote:
> *** I'm curious if there's certain hardware that you folks are using and
> fit all/most of my criteria. ***
> It would be cool if they made a Raspberry Pi with dual onboard NICs, but it
> still doesn't cut it since it takes SD cards and not a hard drive
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 8:55 AM, SilverTip257 wrote:
> I'm in search of some hardware that consumes a low amount of power for use
> as a test-bed for Linux, various coding projects, and LAN services.
>
> 1) Low power consumption (10-15W ... maybe 30W at most)
> 2) Must run Linux without too much f
Doesn't meet all your needs, but you can find old netbooks for $200 or
less. I've taken a couple from the laptop case and put it in a box. It
accepts a laptop drive (I'm using a 90G SSD). You can add a separate NIC
via USB. I'm running RedHat on them at the moment, but I assume CentOS
would work ju
On 01/11/2013 02:59 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 01/11/2013 02:55 PM, SilverTip257 wrote:
>> I'm in search of some hardware that consumes a low amount of power for use
>> as a test-bed for Linux, various coding projects, and LAN services.
>
> I have a couple of HP MicroServers N40L's with 8gb o
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:14 AM, SilverTip257 wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
>> On 01/13/2013 10:15 AM, SilverTip257 wrote:
>> > And it looks like their Atom E6xx CPU [0] supports Intel VT-x.
>> > [0]
>> http://www.intel.com/p/en_US/embedded/hwsw/hardware/atom-e
On 1/14/2013 5:44 AM, SilverTip257 wrote:
> Any ideas why KVM didn't work?
KVM on atom ?
Are you series? just wondering?
for 5-15w I wouldn't try it.
just run the proper services on this machine.
There is no device which does everything you want.
only the sata drive will consume more then the cpu+
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:32 AM, Leon Fauster
wrote:
>
> it does not address all requirements but anyway :-)
> this low power hw came into my mind http://pcengines.ch/alix2d13.htm
>
I held back my vote for PC Engines (memory, hard disk not met). The
latest Soekris net6501 is a better fit; it m
On 01/13/2013 07:44 PM, SilverTip257 wrote:
> Any ideas why KVM didn't work?
No, like I said, I didn't spend much time on it. I mostly use them as
routers, where KVM isn't a requirement.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 01/13/2013 10:15 AM, SilverTip257 wrote:
> > And it looks like their Atom E6xx CPU [0] supports Intel VT-x.
> > [0]
> http://www.intel.com/p/en_US/embedded/hwsw/hardware/atom-e6xx/overview
>
> Before you get too excited, the board's firm
On 01/13/2013 10:15 AM, SilverTip257 wrote:
> And it looks like their Atom E6xx CPU [0] supports Intel VT-x.
> [0] http://www.intel.com/p/en_US/embedded/hwsw/hardware/atom-e6xx/overview
Before you get too excited, the board's firmware is comBIOS, which is a
Soekris-specific firmware that is desig
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 8:40 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 01/11/2013 06:55 AM, SilverTip257 wrote:
> > I'm in search of some hardware that consumes a low amount of power for
> use
> > as a test-bed for Linux, various coding projects, and LAN services.
>
> I use the Soekris 6501 fairly extensive
On 01/11/2013 06:55 AM, SilverTip257 wrote:
> I'm in search of some hardware that consumes a low amount of power for use
> as a test-bed for Linux, various coding projects, and LAN services.
I use the Soekris 6501 fairly extensively. It's available in a much
smaller than 1U case, or 1U if you pr
On 1/11/2013 6:01 PM, SilverTip257 wrote:
>>> it does not address all requirements but anyway:-)
>>> > >this low power hw came into my mindhttp://pcengines.ch/alix2d13.htm
>> >
>> >
> Alixes have AMD Geode CPUs so they're x86
>
>
they are 5 watts, which is great, and many of them have dual etherne
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 01/11/2013 03:12 PM, John Doe wrote:
> >> I have a couple of HP MicroServers N40L's with 8gb of ram each; although
> > You will have to add a NIC to get a second port...
>
> Most NIC's only need 1 port... :D
>
> > And you have an optional
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:09 PM, fred smith
wrote:
> > it does not address all requirements but anyway :-)
> > this low power hw came into my mind http://pcengines.ch/alix2d13.htm
>
>
Alixes have AMD Geode CPUs so they're x86
> I don't know anything about this company or its products, but I just
On 01/11/2013 03:12 PM, John Doe wrote:
>> I have a couple of HP MicroServers N40L's with 8gb of ram each; although
> You will have to add a NIC to get a second port...
Most NIC's only need 1 port... :D
> And you have an optional ILO card.
yup
> Only 2 slots available.
it also only costs £90 a
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 08:02:36PM +0100, Leon Fauster wrote:
> Am 11.01.2013 um 19:53 schrieb Bill Campbell:
> > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013, SilverTip257 wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I'm slightly off-topic here, but it is somewhat CentOS related!
> >>
> >> I'm in search of some hardware that consumes
Am 11.01.2013 um 19:53 schrieb Bill Campbell:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013, SilverTip257 wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm slightly off-topic here, but it is somewhat CentOS related!
>>
>> I'm in search of some hardware that consumes a low amount of power for use
>> as a test-bed for Linux, various coding pro
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013, SilverTip257 wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I'm slightly off-topic here, but it is somewhat CentOS related!
>
>I'm in search of some hardware that consumes a low amount of power for use
>as a test-bed for Linux, various coding projects, and LAN services.
>
>1) Low power consumption (10-15W
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 8:55 AM, SilverTip257 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm slightly off-topic here, but it is somewhat CentOS related!
>
> I'm in search of some hardware that consumes a low amount of power for use
> as a test-bed for Linux, various coding projects, and LAN services.
Google fanless pc
From: Karanbir Singh
> On 01/11/2013 02:55 PM, SilverTip257 wrote:
>> I'm in search of some hardware that consumes a low amount of power for
> use
>> as a test-bed for Linux, various coding projects, and LAN services.
>
> I have a couple of HP MicroServers N40L's with 8gb of ram each; althoug
On 01/11/2013 02:55 PM, SilverTip257 wrote:
> I'm in search of some hardware that consumes a low amount of power for use
> as a test-bed for Linux, various coding projects, and LAN services.
I have a couple of HP MicroServers N40L's with 8gb of ram each; although
they only have a dual core, and a
Hello,
I'm slightly off-topic here, but it is somewhat CentOS related!
I'm in search of some hardware that consumes a low amount of power for use
as a test-bed for Linux, various coding projects, and LAN services.
1) Low power consumption (10-15W ... maybe 30W at most)
2) Must run Linux without
34 matches
Mail list logo
