Am 27.04.2009 um 22:24 schrieb Les Mikesell:
>
> The about to be released 1.7.3 (unstable branch) version is supposed
> to
> add per-user acls to control what devices you can see. If you want to
> help test this feature, grab a copy in a few days or build from the
> source trunk.
I will hav
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Rainer Duffner wrote:
>
I found this pdf with a much nicer overview:
http://www.google.com/url?sa=U&start=2&q=http://www.ukuug.org/events/spring2009/programme/introduction-to-opennms.pdf&ei=jNvvSd3xDtTelQfphIDZDA&sig2=7vpdGBzMcZoATeczKIZh7g&usg=AFQjCNEy6gnHrSgQOneRE
- "Antonio da Silva Martins Junior" escreveu:
> - "Daniel Bird" escreveu:
>
> > > How can I find out which port on the switch a particular server
> is
> > > connected to? I was hoping that this is somehow possible using
> the
> > > mac address and the data gathered from snmpwalk/snmpg
Antonio da Silva Martins Junior wrote:
>
>>> How can I find out which port on the switch a particular server is
>>> connected to? I was hoping that this is somehow possible using the
>>> mac address and the data gathered from snmpwalk/snmpget requests
>> but
>>> I'm not having much luck. How woul
- "Daniel Bird" escreveu:
> > How can I find out which port on the switch a particular server is
> > connected to? I was hoping that this is somehow possible using the
> > mac address and the data gathered from snmpwalk/snmpget requests
> but
> > I'm not having much luck. How would you tac
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 11:46 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Craig White wrote:
> >
> >> I am interested in a comparison with Zenoss - but wait until you know
> >> your way around opennms. Just ask on the opennms list if it doesn't do
> >> something you expect.
> >
> > admittedly, this analysi
Craig White wrote:
>
>> I am interested in a comparison with Zenoss - but wait until you know
>> your way around opennms. Just ask on the opennms list if it doesn't do
>> something you expect.
>
> admittedly, this analysis is less than 24 hours after installation
> but...
>
> Zenoss and O
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 17:50 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> I am interested in a comparison with Zenoss - but wait until you know
> your way around opennms. Just ask on the opennms list if it doesn't do
> something you expect.
admittedly, this analysis is less than 24 hours after installation
Rainer Duffner wrote:
>>
>>> I found this pdf with a much nicer overview:
>>> http://www.google.com/url?sa=U&start=2&q=http://www.ukuug.org/events/spring2009/programme/introduction-to-opennms.pdf&ei=jNvvSd3xDtTelQfphIDZDA&sig2=7vpdGBzMcZoATeczKIZh7g&usg=AFQjCNEy6gnHrSgQOneREKleuRvgAssmHw
>>>
Craig White schrieb:
> On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 22:18 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>
>> I found this pdf with a much nicer overview:
>> http://www.google.com/url?sa=U&start=2&q=http://www.ukuug.org/events/spring2009/programme/introduction-to-opennms.pdf&ei=jNvvSd3xDtTelQfphIDZDA&sig2=7vpdGBzMcZoATe
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 22:18 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Craig White wrote:
> >
> > Thus far (and admittedly this is premature), I find Zenoss a lot beefier
> > but I spent a ton of time setting it up the first time until I figured
> > things out whereas I spent comparatively no time setting OpenN
Craig White wrote:
>
> Thus far (and admittedly this is premature), I find Zenoss a lot beefier
> but I spent a ton of time setting it up the first time until I figured
> things out whereas I spent comparatively no time setting OpenNMS up. But
> I have learned things along the way, especially gett
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 17:50 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Craig White wrote:
> >
> > OK, I've been tracking this conversation, installed/configured/started
> > OpenNMS and have discovered everything and in fact, edited
> > service-configuration.xml as recommended.
> >
> > I'm sort of comparing this
Craig White wrote:
>
> OK, I've been tracking this conversation, installed/configured/started
> OpenNMS and have discovered everything and in fact, edited
> service-configuration.xml as recommended.
>
> I'm sort of comparing this to Zenoss which I had to stop (snmp
> conflicts) to run OpenNMS.
>
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 12:22 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Sean Carolan wrote:
> >> It was somewhat difficult to install on Centos (mostly just getting a
> >> Sun JVM installed sanely) until they added the yum repository. It is
> >> still somewhat complicated to deal with all of the things it can do
> Back to my first email message when I thought you were already using
> OpenNMS... You have to uncomment the Linkd service in
> etc/service-configuration.xml, then restart opennms and give it some
> time to probe. Then it should show from the 'View Node Link Detailed
> Info' at the top left of a
Sean Carolan wrote:
>> It was somewhat difficult to install on Centos (mostly just getting a
>> Sun JVM installed sanely) until they added the yum repository. It is
>> still somewhat complicated to deal with all of the things it can do so
>> I'd suggest joining the mailing list if you haven't alre
> It was somewhat difficult to install on Centos (mostly just getting a
> Sun JVM installed sanely) until they added the yum repository. It is
> still somewhat complicated to deal with all of the things it can do so
> I'd suggest joining the mailing list if you haven't already. It does
> support
Sean Carolan wrote:
>> I'll repeat my recommendation for OpenNMS. Getting started is as easy
>> as 'yum install' (almost...). And it can do about anything you'd want
>> in a monitoring system - including matching up those switch ports with
>> the connected devices.
>
> Les, at first I didn't hee
> I'll repeat my recommendation for OpenNMS. Getting started is as easy
> as 'yum install' (almost...). And it can do about anything you'd want
> in a monitoring system - including matching up those switch ports with
> the connected devices.
Les, at first I didn't heed your advice because I figu
david.mackint...@xdroop.com wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:25:59PM +0100, Daniel Bird wrote:
>
>> Take a look at Netdisco. I seem to remember it's a little tricky to set
>> up on CentOS but I wouldn't live without it now.
>
> "A little tricky"?
>
> Last time I looked at it, I described the
> Last time I looked at it, I described the installation process as
> only slightly less complicated than building a Saturn-V rocket out of
> 1960's era TV parts.
You were not kidding - I some how managed to get netdisco installed
using the CentOS installer script but there were several points whe
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:25:59PM +0100, Daniel Bird wrote:
> Take a look at Netdisco. I seem to remember it's a little tricky to set
> up on CentOS but I wouldn't live without it now.
"A little tricky"?
Last time I looked at it, I described the installation process as
only slightly less compli
> How can I find out which port on the switch a particular server is
> connected to? I was hoping that this is somehow possible using the
> mac address and the data gathered from snmpwalk/snmpget requests but
> I'm not having much luck. How would you tackle this problem?
>
Take a look at Netd
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 01:22:07PM -0500, Sean Carolan wrote:
> SNMPv2-SMI::mib-2.17.4.3.1.2.0.176.208.225.191.82 = INTEGER: 389
>
> Does this mean that the machine is plugged into port 389? I didn't
> think there were 389 ports on the switch.
It'd be a very large switch.
No, it just means it'
> My notes: http://wiki.xdroop.com/space/snmp/Switching+Tables
>
Hi Dave, so using the example from your site above I tested a mac
address against one of our switches:
[scaro...@host:~]$ snmpwalk -v1 -c pub...@200 10.100.3.6
.1.3.6.1.2.1.17.4.3 | grep `hexmac2decoid 00:B0:D0:E1:BF:52`
SNMPv2-SMI:
> We have a six- or seven- year old cisco 3750 which is running an IOS
> which doesn't have the newer MIB; for this switch, we must explicitly
> query the MIB-II Bridge for each VLAN. I would hope that newer
> relesaes of IOS wouldn't have this limitation.
This is exactly what I was missing. Tha
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Sean Carolan wrote:
>> I have a Cisco 6509 switch that I'm monitoring with SNMP from a
>> CentOS5 machine. SNMP polls are the only access I have to this
>> device, we are not allowed to log on via telnet.
>>
>> How can I find out which port on the switch a particular server i
Sean Carolan wrote:
> I have a Cisco 6509 switch that I'm monitoring with SNMP from a
> CentOS5 machine. SNMP polls are the only access I have to this
> device, we are not allowed to log on via telnet.
>
> How can I find out which port on the switch a particular server is
> connected to? I was h
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:44:47AM -0500, Sean Carolan wrote:
> How can I find out which port on the switch a particular server is
> connected to? I was hoping that this is somehow possible using the
> mac address and the data gathered from snmpwalk/snmpget requests but
> I'm not having much luc
Quoting Sean Carolan :
> I have a Cisco 6509 switch that I'm monitoring with SNMP from a
> CentOS5 machine. SNMP polls are the only access I have to this
> device, we are not allowed to log on via telnet.
>
> How can I find out which port on the switch a particular server is
> connected to? I wa
I have a Cisco 6509 switch that I'm monitoring with SNMP from a
CentOS5 machine. SNMP polls are the only access I have to this
device, we are not allowed to log on via telnet.
How can I find out which port on the switch a particular server is
connected to? I was hoping that this is somehow possi
32 matches
Mail list logo
