>>> Therese, the setroubleshoot package mentioned here was installed by
>>> default on my system. If you go to that after you have had a failure it
>>> generally tells you what it saw as a threat, and what to do about it if
>>> it should be allowed. Usually it's just a matter of copy and paste a
>> So is there a way I can set SELinux to permissive, and still
>> be secure while using Calc to connect remotely to a MySQL
>> database? Or is there a way to
>> leave SELinux enforced while also using Calc to connect
>> remotely to a MySQL database?
>
> Sure, there is iptables (firewall).
>
>> I'll study up on it. Can you reccomend a good URL or reading material for
>> setroubleshoot?
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SELinux
Thanks, I'll check it out.
_
Connect and share in new ways with Windows Live.
http://www.wi
On Friday 07 March 2008 19:58:52 Frank Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 19:45:00 +
>
> Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm no expert on this, Therese, but I doubt the advice you've been given
> > that setting to permissive is the same as having it disabled.
>
> http://fedoraproject.o
On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 19:45:00 +
Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm no expert on this, Therese, but I doubt the advice you've been given that
> setting to permissive is the same as having it disabled.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SELinux/Troubleshooting
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melvi
On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 14:46:02 -0500
Therese Trudeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll study up on it. Can you reccomend a good URL or reading material for
> setroubleshoot?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SELinux
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
On Friday 07 March 2008 19:21:06 Therese Trudeau wrote:
> > Therese, the setroubleshoot package mentioned here was installed by
> > default on my system. If you go to that after you have had a failure it
> > generally tells you what it saw as a threat, and what to do about it if
> > it should be a
>> So is there a way I can set SELinux to permissive, and still be secure while
>> using Calc to connect remotely to a MySQL database?
>
> There is a difference between "running selinux in enforcing mode" and "being
> secure". The second does not necessarily require or originate from the first.
Therese Trudeau wrote:
> >> Will setting to permissive prevent real time threats, or
> just tell me what happened after the fact of a failure?
> >
> > http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-March/095637.html
>
> Thanks on that Frank.
>
> So is there a way I can set SELinux to permissive,
On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 14:37:14 -0500
Therese Trudeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So is there a way I can set SELinux to permissive, and still be secure while
> using Calc to connect remotely to a MySQL database?
There is a difference between "running selinux in enforcing mode" and "being
secure".
>> Will setting to permissive prevent real time threats, or just tell me what
>> happened after the fact of a failure?
>
> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-March/095637.html
Thanks on that Frank.
So is there a way I can set SELinux to permissive, and still be secure while
using C
On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 14:21:06 -0500
Therese Trudeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will setting to permissive prevent real time threats, or just tell me what
> happened after the fact of a failure?
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-March/095637.html
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sas
> Therese, the setroubleshoot package mentioned here was installed by default
> on
> my system. If you go to that after you have had a failure it generally tells
> you what it saw as a threat, and what to do about it if it should be allowed.
>
> Usually it's just a matter of copy and paste
On Friday 07 March 2008 17:05:22 Therese Trudeau wrote:
> > To view what selinux is complaining about you may want to install
> > the setroubleshoot package from yum and view what it is complaining
> > about exactly. It will also give you suggestions on how to fix the
> > selinux complaints.
>
> OK
On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 12:05:22 -0500
Therese Trudeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> took out a #2 pencil and
scribbled:
>
> >> I tried re enabling SELinux and OO won't start, so I assume
> >> that I must have SE Linux disabled in order for OpenOffice to
> >> run - is this correct?
> >>
> >> if correct, is the
On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 12:05:22 -0500
Therese Trudeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK Thanks. I'm wondering if a secure alternative would be to run SELinux in
> permissive mode instead of disabled?
Permissive Mode is the same as Disabled Mode, except that selinux will log
stuff for you.
--
MELV
>> I tried re enabling SELinux and OO won't start, so I assume that
>> I must have SE Linux disabled in order for OpenOffice to run - is
>> this correct?
>>
>> if correct, is there a way I can still keep my system secure and
>> run OpenOffice 2.3?
>
> You do not have to keep selinux disabled. Yo
On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 09:46:56 -0500
Therese Trudeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> took out a #2 pencil and
scribbled:
> I tried re enabling SELinux and OO won't start, so I assume that
> I must have SE Linux disabled in order for OpenOffice to run - is
> this correct?
>
> if correct, is there a way I can sti
>>> Well, I have. For third-party applications installed to some obscure
>>> places in opt/, and not included in the PATH :oD
>>>
>>> I bet my whole Aretha Franklin CD collection that adding the correct
>>> path will solve the problem.
>>>
>>> Therese: open a Terminal, su - to root (which mean
19 matches
Mail list logo
