[CentOS] OpenSSH could be faster...then why don't they path it??

https://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/hpn-v-ssh-tput.jpg SCP and the underlying SSH2 protocol implementation in OpenSSH is network performance limited by statically defined internal flow control buffers. These buffers often end up acting as a bottleneck for network throughput of

Re: [CentOS] OpenSSH could be faster...then why don't they path it??

On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 7:20 AM, kellyremo kellyr...@zoho.com wrote: https://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/hpn-v-ssh-tput.jpg SCP and the underlying SSH2 protocol implementation in OpenSSH is network performance limited by statically defined internal flow control buffers. These

Re: [CentOS] OpenSSH could be faster...then why don't they path it??

Kellyremo wrote on Sun, 06 Feb 2011 04:20:40 -0800: Any opinions? Yes. Please carry it to the appropriate forum. Thanks. Kai ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] OpenSSH could be faster...then why don't they path it??

On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 7:20 AM, kellyremo kellyr...@zoho.com wrote: My question is: So Why Does the original OpenSSH has limited statically defined internal flow control buffers?? It could be way faster, even 10x!! Any opinions? Thank you! I think this thread would be very welcome on the