See below...
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Gordon Messmer
Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2010 12:03 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] OpenVPN throughput
On 08/20/2010 10:19 AM, Bill Campbell wrote
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 4:20 AM, j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote:
Last year i've been doing some experiments with openvpn.
Just as the O.P. I was curious about sustainable throughput, and was
disapointed about the results
To obtain maximum resulst, i did:
- use two rather heavy machines (HP
On 08/30/10 6:10 AM, drew einhorn wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 4:20 AM,j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote:
Last year i've been doing some experiments with openvpn.
Just as the O.P. I was curious about sustainable throughput, and was
disapointed about the results
To obtain maximum resulst, i
On 08/30/2010 03:20 AM, j.witvl...@mindef.nl wrote:
Bottleneck was (in my case) the openvpn-process, that was running
100% on a single core, While network was not saturated.
I found the same thing on a 1Gbps network. It's no surprise that the
situation would be the same on a 10Gbps network.
On 08/30/2010 10:35 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
did you try forcing the blowfish cipher? I've heard that's lower in CPU
overhead than most others, although I've not tested this.
Blowfish is the default. I also tested with AES-128-CBC and didn't see
much difference in the throughput.
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com wrote:
bogomips : 1993.68
If cost is a factor, you should be able to find used hp/Compaq
rack-mount servers with Intel Xeon processors with these bogomips:
dmesg | grep -i bogomips
Calibrating delay loop (skipped), value
On 08/19/10 5:01 PM, Boris Epstein wrote:
What sort of VPN does Draytek Vigor2130 run? Is it compatible with
OpenVPN?
googling says, ipsec and pptp. :-/
http://www.draytek.com/user/PdInfoDetail.php?Id=98#PdInfo
(gotta look at the user's guide to find that out)
7 matches
Mail list logo
