From https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos :
CentOS -- CentOS mailing list
About CentOSEnglish (USA)
This is a General discussion list for all issues CentOS. Security updates are
currently announced on this list once daily. This list is read and reply for
anyone that is a membe
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 04:42:49PM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> That is not a threat, it is a promise. I set the moderation bits on the
> list. I get dozens of emails off list asking for people to moderated on
> the flame fest emails.
Johnny,
Thank you for providing this service to the commun
On 10/26/2015 12:19 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Oct 2015, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>> On 10/23/2015 03:44 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> What FUD? It adds *binary* logfiles, readable only with a separate
>>> program; when I restart a service, it does not *tell* me what's going
>>> on,
On Sat, 24 Oct 2015, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 10/23/2015 03:44 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
What FUD? It adds *binary* logfiles, readable only with a separate
program; when I restart a service, it does not *tell* me what's going on,
just worked or didn't, so I don't know, if it fails, where, the
On Mon, October 26, 2015 11:11 am, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 10/24/2015 01:59 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> On Sat, October 24, 2015 12:23 pm, Keith Keller wrote:
>>> On 2015-10-24, Johnny Hughes wrote:
For the sake of everyone's sanity .. if you (any user, not mark
specifically) don't want to
On 10/24/2015 01:59 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> On Sat, October 24, 2015 12:23 pm, Keith Keller wrote:
>> On 2015-10-24, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>>
>>> For the sake of everyone's sanity .. if you (any user, not mark
>>> specifically) don't want to use systemd, then please don't use CentOS-7.
>>
>
On Sat, October 24, 2015 12:23 pm, Keith Keller wrote:
> On 2015-10-24, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
>> For the sake of everyone's sanity .. if you (any user, not mark
>> specifically) don't want to use systemd, then please don't use CentOS-7.
>
> For example, you could help out with Devuan, which aim
On 2015-10-24, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> For the sake of everyone's sanity .. if you (any user, not mark
> specifically) don't want to use systemd, then please don't use CentOS-7.
For example, you could help out with Devuan, which aims to remove
systemd from Debian, or you can switch to Slackware,
On 10/24/2015 10:08 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
Was it? Many servers are deployed as standard images, both physical
and virtual, and having a single, standard, cloned image boot easily
on multiple types of hardware makes lots of sense in this
environment. Dbus is about hardware enumeration, both
On 10/23/2015 05:45 PM, Yamaban wrote:
Well, looking back, during kernel 2.6 there was no systemd at all.
But! That was the time where udev and dbus came into the boot cycle.
...
What was the rationale to get udev into boot? -- Handling the ever
changing mess of plugable, switchable hardware. Not
On 10/23/2015 03:44 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Jonathan Billings wrote:
>> On Oct 23, 2015, at 9:46 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> James B. Byrne wrote:
I am glad to discover that I am not losing my mind. I too have been
rather dismayed at the perceived increase in frequency wit
Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Oct 23, 2015, at 9:46 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> James B. Byrne wrote:
>>>
>>> I am glad to discover that I am not losing my mind. I too have been
>>> rather dismayed at the perceived increase in frequency with which I
>>> must reboot my servers. I wondered wheth
On 10/23/2015 12:51 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
No. If anything, systemd handles upgrades better than SysV init, since it
handles re-execing better. Please stop spreading FUD.
Most likely the glibc and openssl updates are what people are talking about.
Doesn’t require a reboot, just resta
On Oct 23, 2015, at 9:46 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> James B. Byrne wrote:
>>
>> I am glad to discover that I am not losing my mind. I too have been
>> rather dismayed at the perceived increase in frequency with which I
>> must reboot my servers. I wondered whether this was simply a
>> misconc
On Fri, October 23, 2015 9:40 am, John Hodrien wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
>> But coming back to negative part (which is about almost any Linux
>> distribution). These often reboots started in my recollection around 2.6
>> kernel which is long ago.
I always admire the "c
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
But coming back to negative part (which is about almost any Linux
distribution). These often reboots started in my recollection around 2.6
kernel which is long ago.
There's no way that needing a reboot is related to 2.6. Indeed newer features
like ks
On Fri, October 23, 2015 8:46 am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> James B. Byrne wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, October 22, 2015 17:25, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>> . . . Still, disregarding the part some of us dislike personally
>>> (plus often reboots necessary to install some vital updates
>>> - which all Linuxes
James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> On Thu, October 22, 2015 17:25, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> . . . Still, disregarding the part some of us dislike personally
>> (plus often reboots necessary to install some vital updates
>> - which all Linuxes are prone to beginning somewhere around
>> 2.6 kernel) . . .
>
>
On Thu, October 22, 2015 17:25, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> . . . Still, disregarding the part some of us dislike personally
> (plus often reboots necessary to install some vital updates
> - which all Linuxes are prone to beginning somewhere around
> 2.6 kernel) . . .
I am glad to discover that I am
On Thu, October 22, 2015 3:45 pm, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 10/22/2015 03:40 PM, Juan Bernhard wrote:
>>
>> El 22/10/2015 a las 03:00 p.m., Valeri Galtsev escribió:
>>>
>>> On Thu, October 22, 2015 12:49 pm, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 10/22/2015 11:50 AM, Juan Bernhard wrote:
>
> El 22/1
On 10/22/2015 1:40 PM, Juan Bernhard wrote:
Im not saying that they must remove this package, but they also should
include the newer version. I use freebsd (and its not a toy distro
like fedora), and you have several ports, php, php54, php55 and php56
to choose whatever you need.
Please, dont
On 10/22/2015 03:40 PM, Juan Bernhard wrote:
>
> El 22/10/2015 a las 03:00 p.m., Valeri Galtsev escribió:
>>
>> On Thu, October 22, 2015 12:49 pm, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>> On 10/22/2015 11:50 AM, Juan Bernhard wrote:
El 22/10/2015 a las 01:40 p.m., Nux! escribió:
> Kai,
>
> I
quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: "Kai Schaetzl"
To: centos@centos.org
Sent: Thursday, 22 October, 2015 17:33:33
Subject: Re: [CentOS] PHP version not enough for developers
Nux! wrote on Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:27:26 +0100 (BST):
It'
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 01:20:02PM -0300, Juan Bernhard wrote:
> If you want to change to a log term support, you should use php 5.6, this is
> under active development now.
> centos packagers mantainers should listen the PHP developers in this topic,
> they are the ones who really knows PHP
But y
b
of individuals at RH is paid for from). Let's not forget they as well as
us have families to support.
Valeri
>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>>
>>> Nux!
>>> www.nux.ro
>>>
>>> -
Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
>>
>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Kai Schaetzl"
>>> To: centos@centos.org
>>> Sent: Thursday, 22 October, 2015 17:33:33
>>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] P
On 10/22/2015 12:40 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 10/22/2015 10:31 AM, Andrew Holway wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> So, it seems that the current version of PHP in Centos 7 is PHP 5.4.16
>> however this version of PHP stopped getting security support from the PHP
>> people one month ago [1].
>>
>> Now, our de
On 10/22/2015 10:31 AM, Andrew Holway wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So, it seems that the current version of PHP in Centos 7 is PHP 5.4.16
> however this version of PHP stopped getting security support from the PHP
> people one month ago [1].
>
> Now, our developers want to use the new and shiny PHP because t
Juan
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: "Kai Schaetzl"
To: centos@centos.org
Sent: Thursday, 22 October, 2015 17:33:33
Subject: Re: [CentOS] PHP version not enough for developers
Nux! wrote on Thu, 22 Oc
On Thu, October 22, 2015 11:20 am, Juan Bernhard wrote:
>
> El 22/10/2015 a las 12:48 p.m., Valeri Galtsev escribió:
>> On Thu, October 22, 2015 10:40 am, Jim Perrin wrote:
>>> On 10/22/2015 10:31 AM, Andrew Holway wrote:
Hi,
So, it seems that the current version of PHP in Centos 7 is PHP
ginal Message -
> From: "Kai Schaetzl"
> To: centos@centos.org
> Sent: Thursday, 22 October, 2015 17:33:33
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] PHP version not enough for developers
> Nux! wrote on Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:27:26 +0100 (BST):
>
>> It's irrelevant in thi
Nux! wrote on Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:27:26 +0100 (BST):
> It's irrelevant in this case that PHP 5.3 is EOL. It will continue
> to be supported by Red Hat with security patches.
Exactly.
Nevertheless, PHP 5.6 is not "bleeding edge" as someone else said. 5.5 and
5.6 are really state of the art and of
I've been using IUS in the past. They have a good way of naming their
rpms, so they don't interfere with the RH rpms. But they don't support
older CentOS versions still on extended support as long as I needed them.
And they don't provide as much php-related rpms (f.i. pecl-stuff) as remi
does.
Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Juan Bernhard"
> To: centos@centos.org
> Sent: Thursday, 22 October, 2015 17:20:02
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] PHP version not enough for developers
> El 22/10/2015 a las 12:48 p.m., Valeri Galtsev escribió:
>
El 22/10/2015 a las 12:48 p.m., Valeri Galtsev escribió:
On Thu, October 22, 2015 10:40 am, Jim Perrin wrote:
On 10/22/2015 10:31 AM, Andrew Holway wrote:
Hi,
So, it seems that the current version of PHP in Centos 7 is PHP 5.4.16
however this version of PHP stopped getting security support
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> On Thu, October 22, 2015 10:40 am, Jim Perrin wrote:
>> On 10/22/2015 10:31 AM, Andrew Holway wrote:
>>>
>>> So, it seems that the current version of PHP in Centos 7 is PHP 5.4.16
>>> however this version of PHP stopped getting security support from the
>>> PHP people one mo
On Thu, October 22, 2015 10:40 am, Jim Perrin wrote:
>
>
> On 10/22/2015 10:31 AM, Andrew Holway wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> So, it seems that the current version of PHP in Centos 7 is PHP 5.4.16
>> however this version of PHP stopped getting security support from the
>> PHP
>> people one month ago [1].
>
On 10/22/2015 10:31 AM, Andrew Holway wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So, it seems that the current version of PHP in Centos 7 is PHP 5.4.16
> however this version of PHP stopped getting security support from the PHP
> people one month ago [1].
>
> Now, our developers want to use the new and shiny PHP because
"centos"
> Sent: Thursday, 22 October, 2015 16:31:46
> Subject: [CentOS] PHP version not enough for developers
> Hi,
>
> So, it seems that the current version of PHP in Centos 7 is PHP 5.4.16
> however this version of PHP stopped getting security support from the PHP
> peo
Hi,
So, it seems that the current version of PHP in Centos 7 is PHP 5.4.16
however this version of PHP stopped getting security support from the PHP
people one month ago [1].
Now, our developers want to use the new and shiny PHP because they want to
use the latest version of Zend. They are propos
40 matches
Mail list logo
