On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Steve Campbell wrote:
>
> > > The sendmail cf file was not copied, but most of the parms were
> > > duplicated in the sendmail.mc file and sendmail was rebuilt. No errors.
> > > Auth was never working properly since once I put dovecot on, saslauthd
> > > was scram
Quoting Les Mikesell :
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Steve Campbell
> wrote:
> >
> > The sendmail cf file was not copied, but most of the parms were
> > duplicated in the sendmail.mc file and sendmail was rebuilt. No errors.
> > Auth was never working properly since once I put dovecot on, sa
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Steve Campbell wrote:
>
> The sendmail cf file was not copied, but most of the parms were
> duplicated in the sendmail.mc file and sendmail was rebuilt. No errors.
> Auth was never working properly since once I put dovecot on, saslauthd
> was scrambled. Unfortunate
On 23/02/12 20:46, Craig White wrote:
>
> On Feb 23, 2012, at 11:59 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Craig White wrote:
>>>
>>> You should be able to indicate to cyrus-saslauthd to use pam
>>> (/etc/sysconfig/saslauthd) and thus you would need to configure sendmail t
On 2/23/2012 3:57 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Steve Campbell wrote:
>>> On a 6.x system with dovecot and sendmail, /etc/pam.d/smtp is a
>>> symlink. I haven't tracked down the significance.
>> It appears it's just a basic pam file but instead of system-auth, it h
On 2/23/2012 3:46 PM, Craig White wrote:
> On Feb 23, 2012, at 11:59 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Craig White wrote:
>>> You should be able to indicate to cyrus-saslauthd to use pam
>>> (/etc/sysconfig/saslauthd) and thus you would need to configure sendmail to
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Steve Campbell wrote:
>
>> On a 6.x system with dovecot and sendmail, /etc/pam.d/smtp is a
>> symlink. I haven't tracked down the significance.
>
> It appears it's just a basic pam file but instead of system-auth, it has
> password-auth.
System-auth was normal i
On Feb 23, 2012, at 11:59 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Craig White wrote:
>>
>> You should be able to indicate to cyrus-saslauthd to use pam
>> (/etc/sysconfig/saslauthd) and thus you would need to configure sendmail to
>> listen and handle connections on the va
On 2/23/2012 1:35 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Steve Campbell
> wrote:
>> Or maybe by the
>>> slightly-weird 'alternatives' system. Have you followed all of the
>>> symlinks that might be involved?
>> Symlinks? I haven't found any of those yet. All files are re
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Craig White wrote:
>
> You should be able to indicate to cyrus-saslauthd to use pam
> (/etc/sysconfig/saslauthd) and thus you would need to configure sendmail to
> listen and handle connections on the various ports (587 and perhaps 465 for
> Outlook users) and
On Feb 23, 2012, at 8:54 AM, Steve Campbell wrote:
> Seems I've found that dovecot is handling the auth for smtp, and it
> doesn't like sendmail very much since their documentation avoids
> sendmail like the plague.
>
> I sure wish Centos/RH had left something for us so that I wouldn't have
>
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Steve Campbell wrote:
>
> Or maybe by the
>> slightly-weird 'alternatives' system. Have you followed all of the
>> symlinks that might be involved?
>
> Symlinks? I haven't found any of those yet. All files are real files
On a 6.x system with dovecot and sendmail
On 2/23/2012 12:44 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Steve Campbell
> wrote:
>> Seems that I've gotten myself into a war over on the dovecot forums. Not
>> what I intended to do, but when using sendmail with dovecot, it appears
>> that dovecot auth takes over what sas
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Steve Campbell wrote:
>
> Seems that I've gotten myself into a war over on the dovecot forums. Not
> what I intended to do, but when using sendmail with dovecot, it appears
> that dovecot auth takes over what sasl auth used to do.
You are still not making any se
On 2/23/2012 11:55 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:39 AM, wrote:
Seems I've found that dovecot is handling the auth for smtp, and it
doesn't like sendmail very much since their documentation avoids
sendmail like the plague.
>> The Dovecot developer is a smart
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:39 AM, wrote:
>>>
>>> Seems I've found that dovecot is handling the auth for smtp, and it
>>> doesn't like sendmail very much since their documentation avoids
>>> sendmail like the plague.
>
> The Dovecot developer is a smart dude. :-)
>
>> None of that makes any sense.
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Steve Campbell wrote:
>>
>> Seems I've found that dovecot is handling the auth for smtp, and it
>> doesn't like sendmail very much since their documentation avoids
>> sendmail like the plague.
The Dovecot developer is a
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Steve Campbell wrote:
>
> Seems I've found that dovecot is handling the auth for smtp, and it
> doesn't like sendmail very much since their documentation avoids
> sendmail like the plague.
None of that makes any sense. Dovecot should have nothing to do with
smtp,
On 2/23/2012 7:36 AM, Steve Campbell wrote:
>
> On 2/22/2012 4:31 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Steve Campbell
>> wrote:
>>> I'm having problems with what I think is PAM. Seems that ever since
>>> Centos 5, proftpd has had problems using pam, and with Centos 6.2 6
On 2/22/2012 4:31 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Steve Campbell wrote:
>> I'm having problems with what I think is PAM. Seems that ever since
>> Centos 5, proftpd has had problems using pam, and with Centos 6.2 64
>> bit, I had to quit using it altogether with proftpd
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Steve Campbell wrote:
> I'm having problems with what I think is PAM. Seems that ever since
> Centos 5, proftpd has had problems using pam, and with Centos 6.2 64
> bit, I had to quit using it altogether with proftpd.
Do you mean some specific pam step listed in /
I'm having problems with what I think is PAM. Seems that ever since
Centos 5, proftpd has had problems using pam, and with Centos 6.2 64
bit, I had to quit using it altogether with proftpd.
Now I'm trying to set up SMTP AUTH using PAM as the pwcheck parm to
saslauthd, and I can't setup new emai
22 matches
Mail list logo
