Geoff Galitz wrote:
> The NetApp is running out of space and we prefer to not replace it with
> another one, if possible. To that end we are exploring our options.
NetApp, while it has a big name has the worst level of space
efficiency in the industry and it's performance isn't so hot
either. It
Geoff Galitz wrote:
I'm looking at using GFS for parallel access to shared storage, most likely
an iSCSI resource. It will most likely work just fine but I am curious if
folks are using anything with fewer system requisites (e.g. installing and
configuring the Cluster Suite).
Specifically to
Geoff Galitz wrote:
>
>
>
> I'm looking at using GFS for parallel access to shared storage, most likely
> an iSCSI resource. It will most likely work just fine but I am curious if
> folks are using anything with fewer system requisites (e.g. installing and
> configuring the Cluster Suite).
Export
Geoff Galitz
Blankenheim NRW, Deutschland
http://www.galitz.org
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of nate
Sent: Montag, 10. November 2008 16:32
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Parallel/Shared/Distributed Filesystems
>If
I'm looking at using GFS for parallel access to shared storage, most likely
an iSCSI resource. It will most likely work just fine but I am curious if
folks are using anything with fewer system requisites (e.g. installing and
configuring the Cluster Suite).
Specifically to our case, we have 50
5 matches
Mail list logo
