Re: [CentOS] Parted Bug? in C 5.9

On 5/9/2013 8:53 PM, Andrew Reis wrote: > I'm receiving the following error when trying to repartition and reformat a > USB flash drive via parted using a simple script. The bug follows: > > > > /sbin/parted -s /dev/sdb mkpart primary fat32 has the USB key been labeled? frankly, most of my USB

Re: [CentOS] Parted Bug? in C 5.9

; To: centos@centos.org > Cc: j...@dbmsinc.com > Subject: [CentOS] Parted Bug? in C 5.9 > > I'm receiving the following error when trying to repartition and reformat a > USB flash drive via parted using a simple script. The bug follows: > > > > /sbin/parted -s /dev/sdb mkpart pr

Re: [CentOS] Parted Bug? in C 5.9

-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Reis Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2013 3:33 PM To: centos@centos.org Cc: j...@dbmsinc.com Subject: [CentOS] Parted Bug? in C 5.9 I'm receiving the following error when tryi

[CentOS] Parted Bug? in C 5.9

I'm receiving the following error when trying to repartition and reformat a USB flash drive via parted using a simple script. The bug follows: /sbin/parted -s /dev/sdb mkpart primary fat32 Backtrace has 14 calls on stack: 14: /usr/lib/libparted-1.8.so.0(ped_assert+0x3b) [0x10af3b] 13: /u