Dear salam,
Please make sure that, user viewpoint must be a member of that group
which user todd belongs (because todd is able to write in the directory).
I suppose permissions donot need to be checked, beacuse todd is able to
write.
OR, the files permissions should be 664
Regards,
Umair Shakil
Todd Cary wrote:
Thank you all for the store of knowledge.
I do have a follow up question about Rick's suggestion concerning
ownership of the "Apache" directories. What is a good alternative? If
they are "root", can Apache access them? Is that even good?
Suggestions welcomed...
Todd
I'm
Thank you all for the store of knowledge.
I do have a follow up question about Rick's suggestion concerning
ownership of the "Apache" directories. What is a good alternative? If
they are "root", can Apache access them? Is that even good?
Suggestions welcomed...
Todd
Todd Cary wrote:
My w
Todd,
On 10/1/07, Todd Cary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My www directory is owned by "apache" and the group is "todd" and the
> permissions are 775.
>
> My Windows computers use Samba and they log into Linux with "todd".
>
> Under the www directory there are various directories which may have a
>
I think the 'force user' and 'force group' diretives are the right
answer for you question. Set this on your samba share and set the user
and group you want to maintain the owner and group permissions.
On 10/1/07, Todd Cary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My www directory is owned by "apache" and t
My www directory is owned by "apache" and the group is "todd" and the
permissions are 775.
My Windows computers use Samba and they log into Linux with "todd".
Under the www directory there are various directories which may have a
group belonging to a user e.g. "viewpoint". Using this example,
6 matches
Mail list logo
