David Hrbáč napsal(a):
Hi,
RH devel kernels from http://people.redhat.com/dzickus/el5/ built
against Centos tree are available here:
http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-kernel/stable/x86_64/repodata/
http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-kernel/stable/i386/repodata/
Regards,
David Hrbáč
RH devel
David Hrbáč wrote:
RH devel kernel from http://people.redhat.com/vgoyal/rhel4
and built
against Centos tree are available here:
http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb-kernel/stable/x86_64/repodata/
http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb-kernel/stable/i386/repodata/
I would guess what was said by Dag
David Hrbáč wrote:
RH devel kernel from http://people.redhat.com/vgoyal/rhel4 and built
against Centos tree are available here:
http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb-kernel/stable/x86_64/repodata/
http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb-kernel/stable/i386/repodata/
I dont see the point in building
Vandaman napsal(a):
I would guess what was said by Dag here
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-January/070168.html
applies here as well?
Not for everyone, as we tests kernels intensively and on a large volume
of machines, web need easy way. So yum repo is the point, not mentioning
Vandaman wrote:
Perhaps the OP David Hrbáč's talents can be utilised elsewhere
in CentOS such as php which people ask for and they are told it
is in testing for 5 years?
The problem lies somewhere else: None of the people who use that php from
testing are ever reporting back. It is built,
Ralph Angenendt napsal(a):
The problem lies somewhere else: None of the people who use that php from
testing are ever reporting back. It is built, but does not get any thumbs
up (or thumbs down).
Ralph
Ralph,
you are not right this time. I remember at least 2-3 posts about running
testing
David Hrbáč wrote:
Ralph Angenendt napsal(a):
The problem lies somewhere else: None of the people who use that php from
testing are ever reporting back. It is built, but does not get any thumbs
up (or thumbs down).
Ralph
Ralph,
you are not right this time. I remember at least 2-3
Dag Wieers wrote:
I would personally recommend to use the upstream kernels
from Red Hat
instead. My main motivation is that if you need to report a
problem, you
can do so directly to Red Hat without risking it to be a
specific rebuild
problem.
If those are just 5.3 beta kernels then
Hi,
RH devel kernels from http://people.redhat.com/dzickus/el5/ built
against Centos tree are available here:
http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-kernel/stable/x86_64/repodata/
http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-kernel/stable/i386/repodata/
Regards,
David Hrbáč
2009/1/3 David Hrbáč hrbac.c...@seznam.cz:
Hi,
RH devel kernels from http://people.redhat.com/dzickus/el5/ built
against Centos tree are available here:
http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-kernel/stable/x86_64/repodata/
http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-kernel/stable/i386/repodata/
Is this safe
Vnpenguin wrote:
Is this safe to use ?
You are not obliged to use them. If you are happy with
the CentOS or CentOSplus Kernel then you do not need
to install those. There are rare occasions when people
have issues, they file against upstream bugzilla and a
test kernel is recommended.
It
Vandaman wrote:
Vnpenguin wrote:
Is this safe to use ?
You are not obliged to use them. If you are happy with
the CentOS or CentOSplus Kernel then you do not need
to install those. There are rare occasions when people
have issues, they file against upstream bugzilla and a
test
On Sat, 3 Jan 2009, Vandaman wrote:
Vnpenguin wrote:
Is this safe to use ?
You are not obliged to use them. If you are happy with
the CentOS or CentOSplus Kernel then you do not need
to install those. There are rare occasions when people
have issues, they file against upstream bugzilla
13 matches
Mail list logo
