On 7 February 2014 16:34, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 2/7/2014 8:06 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> > The two I linked are internal units to go in a 5.25" bay ... that's why
> > you'd need an internal 4-6 port card to make them worthwhile.
>
> ah, I thought we were talking about esata external 4-bays, s
On 2/7/2014 8:06 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> The two I linked are internal units to go in a 5.25" bay ... that's why
> you'd need an internal 4-6 port card to make them worthwhile.
ah, I thought we were talking about esata external 4-bays, since we were
talking about microservers which don't HAVE
On 7 February 2014 15:45, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 2/7/2014 7:28 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> > I was thinking of a bay along the lines of:
> >
> > http://www.sharkoon.com/?q=en/node/1824 or
> > http://www.icydock.com/goods.php?id=151
> >
> > I wonder what performance would be like through multip
On 2/7/2014 7:28 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> I was thinking of a bay along the lines of:
>
> http://www.sharkoon.com/?q=en/node/1824 or
> http://www.icydock.com/goods.php?id=151
>
> I wonder what performance would be like through multiplexing the eSATA
> interface compared to buying a 4-6 port inte
On 7 February 2014 15:01, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 2/7/2014 6:15 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> >> >the eSATA expander has its own PSU. the Microserver would just be
> >> >powering the esata card, which is nothing.
> >> >
> > I don't suppose you have a link to one you've looked at already do you?
On 2/7/2014 6:15 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>> >the eSATA expander has its own PSU. the Microserver would just be
>> >powering the esata card, which is nothing.
>> >
> I don't suppose you have a link to one you've looked at already do you?
something like this...
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ
On 7 February 2014 14:13, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 2/7/2014 6:09 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> > I do like the idea about the expander though ... power might be an issue
> > given it's a low power PSU that comes with it - would probably have to
> swap
> > that part out.
>
> the eSATA expander has i
On 2/7/2014 6:09 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> I do like the idea about the expander though ... power might be an issue
> given it's a low power PSU that comes with it - would probably have to swap
> that part out.
the eSATA expander has its own PSU. the Microserver would just be
powering the esat
On 7 February 2014 14:03, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 2/7/2014 5:56 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> > I frankly don't care if I lose the system disk - it's quick to rebuild
> the
> > system - it's the data I care about.
> >
> > On this I'm running F20 rather than C6 primarily for the better BTRFS
> (whe
On 2/7/2014 5:56 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> I frankly don't care if I lose the system disk - it's quick to rebuild the
> system - it's the data I care about.
>
> On this I'm running F20 rather than C6 primarily for the better BTRFS (when
> el7 rolls around I'll contemplate a rebuild to that then) a
On 7 February 2014 11:34, John Doe wrote:
> From: Jeff Allison
>
> > Ok I've a HP mircoserver that I'm building up.
> > It's got 4 bays for be used for data that I'm considering setup up woth
> > softwere raid (mdadm)
> > I've 2 x 2TB 2 x 2.5 TB and 2 x 1TB, I'm leaning towards usig the
> > 4 2.
From: Jeff Allison
> Ok I've a HP mircoserver that I'm building up.
> It's got 4 bays for be used for data that I'm considering setup up woth
> softwere raid (mdadm)
> I've 2 x 2TB 2 x 2.5 TB and 2 x 1TB, I'm leaning towards usig the
> 4 2.x TB is a raid 5 array to get 6TB.
Just a reminder that
Ok I've a HP mircoserver that I'm building up.
It's got 4 bays for be used for data that I'm considering setup up woth
softwere raid (mdadm)
I've 2 x 2TB 2 x 2.5 TB and 2 x 1TB, I'm leaning towards usig the 4 2.x TB
is a raid 5 array to get 6TB.
Now the data is on the 2.5TB disks currently.
So
13 matches
Mail list logo
