Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 4.7 status

Matt wrote: > What changes will be in CentOS 4.7 vs. 4.6? http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS4.7 Cheers, Ralph pgpINMiAVvyBg.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listi

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

Bill Campbell wrote: Anyway, 5 and 10 MB HDs were the common PC drives back in the 80s and 90s. 20MB was a *big* one. Seek (average) of > 60ms was usual and fast ones were less than that. The first HDs that Radio Shack sold for their Model 16s were 8in 8MB units and the primary HD which came

Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 4.7 status

> 4.7 was delayed so the buildservers could get 5.2 ready. 4.7 is probably in > the queue now, but it takes a while because CentOS doesn't have a million > dollar hardware budget, and has to schedule things to best use the hardware > available. What changes will be in CentOS 4.7 vs. 4.6? I would

Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS 4.7 status

where can we get ISOs? I can test for VirtualBox atleast. If there is a problem I will submit a bug. On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 8-30-2008 6:37 PM Adrian Sevcenco spake the following: >> >> Hi, >> i was wondering what is the status of 4.7 >> Thank

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

On Tue, Sep 02, 2008, William L. Maltby wrote: > >On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 12:26 -0700, Scott Silva wrote: >> >> >> > Can't argue with you :-) It does seem likely, as 1GB flash drives >> > wouldn't >> > have been a possibility at that time. I never owned one at all until >> > relatively recentl

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

On Tue, September 2, 2008 14:31, William L. Maltby wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 12:26 -0700, Scott Silva wrote: >> >> >> > Can't argue with you :-) It does seem likely, as 1GB flash drives >> wouldn't >> > have been a possibility at that time. I never owned one at all until >> > relatively

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 12:26 PM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I remember when 1 GB *hard* drives didn't exist! > I still have a few - a 20MB Tulin TL225 that was HUGE when it first came out, and a couple of Seagates, one is 120MB and one is 512MB. Oh, and I almost forgot my Priam 780

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 11:32 AM, John R Pierce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ric Moore wrote: >> I once had a pretty large collection of CP/M machines. I had three >> IMSAI's > ok, now you've done it. > lets play "Name that old computer!" > http://hogranch.com/digital.research/My_office_upstairs

[CentOS] Re: CentOS 4.7 status

on 8-30-2008 6:37 PM Adrian Sevcenco spake the following: Hi, i was wondering what is the status of 4.7 Thank you, Best regards, Adrian 4.7 was delayed so the buildservers could get 5.2 ready. 4.7 is probably in the queue now, but it takes a while because CentOS doesn't have a million dollar h

[CentOS] Re: Anti Virus and Anti Spam

on 8-29-2008 7:55 PM horas simalango spake the following: New be in linux! Currently I have Install DNS, Email and Web server using centos 4.3. All functions are running properly! What anti virus and anti spam recomended for me to install to my server? What I have to configure after installing an

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 12:26 -0700, Scott Silva wrote: > > > > Can't argue with you :-) It does seem likely, as 1GB flash drives wouldn't > > have been a possibility at that time. I never owned one at all until > > relatively recently. > > > I remember when 1 GB *hard* drives didn't exist!

[CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

Can't argue with you :-) It does seem likely, as 1GB flash drives wouldn't have been a possibility at that time. I never owned one at all until relatively recently. I remember when 1 GB *hard* drives didn't exist! -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you no

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Fair enough. Out of curiosity - do they work in W2K out of the box, or > require some update? I ask because I'm considering W2K as a > VM. > Ya got me there - I /think/ so, but am not sure. mhr _

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

On Tuesday 02 September 2008 19:10:32 MHR wrote: > On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 3.1.1, IIRC > > Nope, 3.11. > You could be right. > > I did. It was better than 95, and better than 98 first edition. > > I was making a joke about WfW screaming. > > >

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

For shame! WfW was 3.11, 3.1.1, IIRC actually, there was a 3.10 and 3.11 release of Windows for Workgroups. The 3.11 release introduced the use of 32 bit protected mode implementation of the network stack and file system via extensive use of VxD drivers, and set the stage for

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Anne Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 3.1.1, IIRC > Nope, 3.11. > I did. It was better than 95, and better than 98 first edition. > I was making a joke about WfW screaming. > USB drives should work without any problem at all, assuming he is using 98SE. > No

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

On Tuesday 02 September 2008 18:25:10 MHR wrote: > On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But Windows for Workgroups 3.1 really screams on the newer hardware! ;-P > > For shame! WfW was 3.11, 3.1.1, IIRC > and it just screams, or did, or so I heard - > neve

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But Windows for Workgroups 3.1 really screams on the newer hardware! ;-P > For shame! WfW was 3.11, and it just screams, or did, or so I heard - never used it. I stuck with 3.1 until 98 was due out and then, finally, cav

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

Ric Moore wrote: I once had a pretty large collection of CP/M machines. I had three IMSAI's ok, now you've done it. lets play "Name that old computer!" http://hogranch.com/digital.research/My_office_upstairs_at_734_Lighthouse.jpg (my office circa 1979) __

[CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

This discussion really should be on the classic computers mail list. Hmmm 2Mhz 8080a vs 3.0Ghz Core 2 duo ... things have changed a bit on the personal computer side. But Windows for Workgroups 3.1 really screams on the newer hardware! ;-P -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope eve

[CentOS] Re: Help me

on 9-1-2008 10:36 AM Martyn Hare spake the following: Top is preferred, it's a standard just like it's a standard to put: " -- [signature here] " And which "standard" is that? Is it in the RFC's? I would "prefer" to *not* give a quarter of my income to the government, but then they would

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

On Sun, August 31, 2008 04:03, Ric Moore wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 10:51 -0500, David Dyer-Bennet wrote: >> I've also still got a laptop that's probably older than him. It runs >> CP/M. > > I once had a pretty large collection of CP/M machines. I had three > IMSAI's. a VDP-80 and two VDP-

[CentOS] Re: small window manager

Paul Bijnens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What is an alternative X window manager, supported by CentOS, > that has very small memory footprint? I'm not sure what your standard is for "supported by CentOS", but Window Maker works well and is available from EPEL. - Michael -- mouse, n: A device

Re: [CentOS] Re: Help me

Karanbir Singh wrote: andylockran wrote: In thunderbird, it's very easy to change. Tools>Accounts>Composition>Automatically Start My Reply ABOVE/BELOW The Quote. While talking about Thunderbird, some of you might also want to look at : https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/3

Re: [CentOS] Re: Help me

andylockran wrote: In thunderbird, it's very easy to change. Tools>Accounts>Composition>Automatically Start My Reply ABOVE/BELOW The Quote. While talking about Thunderbird, some of you might also want to look at : https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/347 -- Karanbir Singh

Re: [CentOS] Re: Help me

On Sep 1, 2008, at 1:36 PM, Martyn Hare wrote: I would recommend top posting. that's great, but please don't do so here. the CentOS website asks that you bottom post: http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=16 and this issue was done to death just a few months ago: http://l

Re: [CentOS] Re: Help me

Top is preferred, it's a standard just like it's a standard to put: " -- [signature here] " I would recommend top posting. On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 17:12:11 +0100 andylockran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > on 8-31-2008 9:05 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake the following: > >> Interestingly enough, we use

[CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

8" floppies. Now that does bring back a memory for me. I was working on a project in Texas. The customer was in Kentucky as I recall. I fixed a problem and gave an 8" floppy to our Shipping department, to send to the customer. The customer called me on the phone, to inform me that the floppy ha

Re: [CentOS] Re: Help me

on 8-31-2008 9:05 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake the following: Interestingly enough, we use top posting 99% of the time at work, even though it takes extra effort to do so in thunderbird. We had a new employee that started with us, and used bottom posting on some of her replies, and most people t

[CentOS] Re: Help me

on 8-31-2008 9:05 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake the following: Top posting is when you put your reply on top of the original message, the way I'm doing. Apparently some people prefer that for some reason which dates back to the days of newsgroups. Some people also don't understand that not all

[CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

On Mon, 1 Sep 2008, Paul wrote: Hmmm, Processor Technologies used to have a voice coil actuated dual drive that shared it between both drives IIRC. Interesting drive with a motorized eject, thing is you had to wait for the disk to complete eject before you grabbed it, if you grabbed it before i

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 22:21 -0400, Ric Moore wrote: > On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 11:20 -0700, Bill Campbell wrote: > > > When I first encountered a customer who had disk drive problems such that > > we replaced the 8in drives in their Radio Shack Model II several times, it > > wasn't until I went on-s

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 11:20 -0700, Bill Campbell wrote: > When I first encountered a customer who had disk drive problems such that > we replaced the 8in drives in their Radio Shack Model II several times, it > wasn't until I went on-site to find that they were storing their floppies > by stickin

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Bill Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 31, 2008, Lanny Marcus wrote: >>On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 7:35 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 5:27 PM, Bill Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Wait, I have a Pascal Microengin

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

On Sun, Aug 31, 2008, Lanny Marcus wrote: >On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 7:35 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 5:27 PM, Bill Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I still have a Tandy 4000, 386-16 no cache, that is used occassionally to >>> program EPROMS. This same machin

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 7:35 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 5:27 PM, Bill Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I still have a Tandy 4000, 386-16 no cache, that is used occassionally to >> program EPROMS. This same machine ran Xenix for years before being abused >> b

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 10:51 -0500, David Dyer-Bennet wrote: > On Thu, August 28, 2008 17:50, Scott Silva wrote: > > > >> > >> You do realize I'm one of the "squirts" you're referring to right? > >> I started working with computers in more than just a 'hey, I need to > >> write this paper' sort o

[CentOS] Re: Anti Virus and Anti Spam

"horas simalango" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > New be in linux! > Currently I have Install DNS, Email and Web server using centos 4.3. > All functions are running properly! > What anti virus and anti spam recomended for me to install to my > server? I have had very good success with SpamAssassin

RE: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing DualLayer DVD)

> Wow! ... OK where were you during the Gettysburg address! ;-) Fourth row, just left of center from his point of view. They man dribbled spittle when he got going. Oldest I have for the crew is paper-tape. The new 'cruits around here ask how to do a backup to paper tape. Daniel

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

John Hinton wrote: CentOS must be running really good for everyone as this which is now the 'oldest thread that already should have died' seems to keep interrupting my normally busy CentOS mailbox. :( And you really don't want me to start into old.. Can we get back to the regularly schedu

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 10:56 AM, John Hinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > CentOS must be running really good for everyone as this which is now the > 'oldest thread that already should have died' seems to keep interrupting my > normally busy CentOS mailbox. :( And you really don't want me to start

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

CentOS must be running really good for everyone as this which is now the 'oldest thread that already should have died' seems to keep interrupting my normally busy CentOS mailbox. :( And you really don't want me to start into old.. Can we get back to the regularly scheduled program please?

[CentOS] Re: unix2dos did NOT fix line wrap problem on PC

on 8-29-2008 4:46 AM Miguel Medalha spake the following: Do a google search for "pfe.exe" (Programmers File Editor). Its a freeware windoz text editor that handles linux / Unix or dos / windows end of line characters with out any problems. If you can't find it e mail me off list and I can att

[CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

on 8-29-2008 9:47 AM R P Herrold spake the following: On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Jim Perrin wrote: On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:58 AM, R P Herrold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: you win ;) -- I don't want to be older, and in my head, I'm still in my twenties. Face it. Your golden buckeye card has a r

[CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

on 8-29-2008 9:04 AM Bill Campbell spake the following: On Fri, Aug 29, 2008, William L. Maltby wrote: On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 17:27 -0700, Bill Campbell wrote: I still have a Tandy 4000, 386-16 no cache, that is used occassionally to program EPROMS. This same machine ran Xenix for years before

[CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Jim Perrin wrote: On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:58 AM, R P Herrold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: you win ;) -- I don't want to be older, and in my head, I'm still in my twenties. Face it. Your golden buckeye card has a registration number of 1. you cannot escape this fact, no

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

On Fri, Aug 29, 2008, William L. Maltby wrote: > >On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 17:27 -0700, Bill Campbell wrote: >> > >> I still have a Tandy 4000, 386-16 no cache, that is used occassionally to >> program EPROMS. This same machine ran Xenix for years before being abused >> by installing DR-DOS on it. >

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

On Thu, August 28, 2008 17:50, Scott Silva wrote: > >> >> You do realize I'm one of the "squirts" you're referring to right? >> I started working with computers in more than just a 'hey, I need to >> write this paper' sort of way around 1995. The *first* CPU I used was >> a pentium (though this

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

On Fri, August 29, 2008 07:58, R P Herrold wrote: > > Reading closely the rest of the thread, I 'programmed' > plugboards on 5xx series unit record machines, ran 026, 027, > and 029's; ran the 13 pocket sorter; later wrote tape and > print spooling deivers for our 1401, and all that. I don't > m

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 8:58 AM, R P Herrold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > you win ;) -- I don't want to be older, and in my head, I'm still in my > twenties. Face it. Your golden buckeye card has a registration number of 1. you cannot escape this fact, no matter how much single-malt confusion y

[CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing, Dual Layer DVD)

Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: on 8-28-2008 4:15 PM William L. Maltby spake the following: > On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 15:50 -0700, Scott Silva wrote: >> > >> I have motherboards in my garage older than you! ;-D > > PIKER! I've mobos still running (when I fire '

[CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, Robert wrote: We might be entering "first liar don't have a chance" territory here. Do you remember where you were when Kennedy was shot? sadly, yes I was in the last Ramac 305 class ever held, on lunch break and had watched the motorcade pass from a lunchroom window.

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 20:47 -0400, fred smith wrote: > > I've still got the first computer I ever bought (a lot newer than the first > one I ever used), a screamin' 10 Mhz XT clone with 8087 too! Last year > when I fired it up it still worked, though the hard drive had bitten > the dust. > > An

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 17:35 -0700, MHR wrote: > > Well, all I have that foes back that far is a 2nd gen IBM PC (the 64k > m/b) that would probably work if I knew where any of my 360k MS-DOS > floppies were. I could make some for you. Just need to pop the drive into one of my units. > > mhr >

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 17:27 -0700, Bill Campbell wrote: > > I still have a Tandy 4000, 386-16 no cache, that is used occassionally to > program EPROMS. This same machine ran Xenix for years before being abused > by installing DR-DOS on it. For shame, for shame! You should have known better! ;-

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 16:57 -0700, Scott Silva wrote: > on 8-28-2008 4:15 PM William L. Maltby spake the following: > > On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 15:50 -0700, Scott Silva wrote: > >> > > > >> I have motherboards in my garage older than you! ;-D > > > > PIKER! I've mobos still running (when I fire '

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

R P Herrold wrote: > On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, William L. Maltby wrote: > >> PIKER! I've mobos still running (when I fire 'em up). Although I'm >> seriously considering ditching the 386SX with Win 3.11. Don't find any > > three words: Processor Tech Sol Two words: Compulsive Hoarders. All of you! Ch

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

R P Herrold wrote: On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, Akemi Yagi wrote: three words: Processor Tech Sol -- Russ herrold Ahh, I was waiting for you to show up. OK, everyone, if you are trying to show your age, stop now -- because no one can win orc_orc (Russ, our CentOS dev). Actually from slightly b

[CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, Akemi Yagi wrote: three words: Processor Tech Sol -- Russ herrold Ahh, I was waiting for you to show up. OK, everyone, if you are trying to show your age, stop now -- because no one can win orc_orc (Russ, our CentOS dev). Actually from slightly before that era, I also

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 5:58 PM, R P Herrold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, William L. Maltby wrote: > >> PIKER! I've mobos still running (when I fire 'em up). Although I'm >> seriously considering ditching the 386SX with Win 3.11. Don't find any > > three words: Processor Tech

[CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, William L. Maltby wrote: PIKER! I've mobos still running (when I fire 'em up). Although I'm seriously considering ditching the 386SX with Win 3.11. Don't find any three words: Processor Tech Sol -- Russ herrold ___ CentOS maili

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 05:35:28PM -0700, MHR wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 5:27 PM, Bill Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I still have a Tandy 4000, 386-16 no cache, that is used occassionally to > > program EPROMS. This same machine ran Xenix for years before being abused > > by in

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 5:27 PM, Bill Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I still have a Tandy 4000, 386-16 no cache, that is used occassionally to > program EPROMS. This same machine ran Xenix for years before being abused > by installing DR-DOS on it. > > I have a Radio Shack Model 100, the

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

On Thu, Aug 28, 2008, Scott Silva wrote: > on 8-28-2008 4:15 PM William L. Maltby spake the following: >> On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 15:50 -0700, Scott Silva wrote: >>> >> >>> I have motherboards in my garage older than you! ;-D >> >> PIKER! I've mobos still running (when I fire 'em up). Although I'm >

[CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

on 8-28-2008 4:15 PM William L. Maltby spake the following: On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 15:50 -0700, Scott Silva wrote: I have motherboards in my garage older than you! ;-D PIKER! I've mobos still running (when I fire 'em up). Although I'm seriously considering ditching the 386SX with Win 3.11.

Re: [CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 15:50 -0700, Scott Silva wrote: > > > > I have motherboards in my garage older than you! ;-D PIKER! I've mobos still running (when I fire 'em up). Although I'm seriously considering ditching the 386SX with Win 3.11. Don't find any reason to fire it up anymore. Hell, even

[CentOS] Re: Curmudgeoning (was Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD)

You do realize I'm one of the "squirts" you're referring to right? I started working with computers in more than just a 'hey, I need to write this paper' sort of way around 1995. The *first* CPU I used was a pentium (though this is not the oldest, as I developed a fondness for antiques). So y

[CentOS] Re: Problem with gnome with file type recognition.

on 8-28-2008 3:21 AM ArcosCom Linux User spake the following: I have a problem with some file recognition with gnome (CentOS 5.2). I have some DVD with AVI files I burn some time ago (and the files were checked and the DVD are fine), and curiously only the 3 or 4 first files were recognized as A

[CentOS] Re: CentOS Mailing list on nabble . why not ??

on 8-28-2008 4:26 AM Ralph Angenendt spake the following: Ralph Angenendt wrote: Karanbir Singh wrote: Ralph Angenendt wrote: Ah okay, it's something like gmane.org without the NNTP interface. Yes, I think we could do that if noone else has anything against that. or just tell people to use gm

Re: [CentOS] Re: system-config-kickstart

re install the package and try again . this some times happens. On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 13:14 -0400, Jerry Geis wrote: > Jerry Geis wrote: > > When I run this command on centos 5.2 it just sets there nothing ever > > happens. > > Any ideas? I have ran it on two centos 5.2 machines. I can control

[CentOS] Re: iptables question

on 8-27-2008 4:27 PM Joseph L. Casale spake the following: http://iptables.rlworkman.net/chunkyhtml/index.html Nice doc, any ideas on how to print it (or many chapters easily) so I can haul with me on my plane ride this weekend? Thanks! jlc Or here is a link to a non chunk version http://ipt

[CentOS] Re: iptables question

on 8-27-2008 4:27 PM Joseph L. Casale spake the following: http://iptables.rlworkman.net/chunkyhtml/index.html Nice doc, any ideas on how to print it (or many chapters easily) so I can haul with me on my plane ride this weekend? Thanks! jlc E-mail me offlist and I can get make a pdf if you wa

Re: [CentOS] Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD

On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 23:33 +0300, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 03:19:01PM -0400, William L. Maltby wrote: > > > > I don't have atrpm on my system. You might check there and see if they > > have later packages. Just be aware that many months ago that repo was > > less trusted (IIRC

[CentOS] Re: Problems with writing Dual Layer DVD

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 03:19:01PM -0400, William L. Maltby wrote: > My updated 5.2 has these >cdrdao-1.2.1-2.i386 >cdrecord-2.01-10.i386 >xcdroast-0.98a15-12.2.2.i386 > > Rpmforge has only the development rpm for the current cdrecord. > > I don't have atrpm on my system. You might c

[CentOS] Re: Logwatch doesn´t report on dovecot

Am Mittwoch, den 27.08.2008, 11:03 +0200 schrieb Ralph Angenendt: > henry ritzlmayr wrote: > > Hi List, > > > > Centos 5(.2) ships with dovecot-1.0.7-2.el5 and logwatch-7.3-6.el5 > > > > However the shipped logwatch is not aware of dovecot 1.x meaning none of > > the log entries (var/log/maillog)

Re: [CentOS] Re: slow Perl on CentOS 5

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 6:18 AM, Mark Pryor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Anyone want to try and get this built on C5.2? > ftp://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/8/SRPMS/perl-5.8.8-40.fc8.src.rpm > > the above runs in about .4 sec, while on C5.2 it takes 8-12 seconds. > Can not

Re: [CentOS] Re: slow Perl on CentOS 5

hello, --- On Tue, 8/26/08, Stephen John Smoogen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Stephen John Smoogen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Re: slow Perl on CentOS 5 > To: "CentOS mailing list" > Date: Tuesday, August 26, 2008, 2:27 PM > On Tue,

Re: [CentOS] Re: restarting static-routes-ipv6

Scott Silva wrote: on 8-26-2008 3:57 PM Robert Moskowitz spake the following: I want to change the contents of my /etc/sysconfig/static-routes-ipv6 and NOT restart the network. Is there a way to do this??? Change the routes in /etc/sysconfig/static-routes-ipv6 then manually add them with the

[CentOS] Re: restarting static-routes-ipv6

on 8-26-2008 3:57 PM Robert Moskowitz spake the following: I want to change the contents of my /etc/sysconfig/static-routes-ipv6 and NOT restart the network. Is there a way to do this??? Change the routes in /etc/sysconfig/static-routes-ipv6 then manually add them with the route command. Exam

Re: [CentOS] Re: how can I get the kernel source codes of CentOS5.2

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 8-26-2008 2:02 PM Lanny Marcus spake the following: >> >> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Akemi Yagi >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> >>> When you ran: >>> >>> yum install fuse fuse-ntfs-3g dkms dkms-fuse >>> >>> did

Re: [CentOS] Re: slow Perl on CentOS 5

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 8-26-2008 2:08 PM Karanbir Singh spake the following: >> >> Akemi Yagi wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: If your Perl apps are unusually slow on CentOS 5

[CentOS] Re: slow Perl on CentOS 5

on 8-26-2008 2:08 PM Karanbir Singh spake the following: Akemi Yagi wrote: On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If your Perl apps are unusually slow on CentOS 5, have a look at this blog: http://blog.vipul.net/2008/08/24/redhat-perl-what-a-tragedy/ Summar

[CentOS] Re: loading modules across reboots

on 8-26-2008 12:57 PM Joseph L. Casale spake the following: I have a CentOS 5.2 install on a machine with the Marvell nic issue outlined in http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2612. I have a few questions regarding this, what does the # echo "11ab 4364" > /sys/bus/pci/drivers/sky2/new_id line do?

[CentOS] Re: how can I get the kernel source codes of CentOS5.2

on 8-26-2008 2:02 PM Lanny Marcus spake the following: On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Akemi Yagi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Actually, the documentat

Re: [CentOS] Re: YumRepo Warning: not using ftp, http[s], or file for repos, skipping - 5 is not a valid release or hasnt been released yet

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 8-26-2008 9:06 AM Rudi Ahlers spake the following: > > >> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >> >> >> >>Hi Ralph, >> >>That is one full line: >> >>

Re: [CentOS] Re: (Global/Any) setting for "show hidden files?" - SOLVED

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> on 8-26-2008 4:16 AM Karanbir Singh spake the following: >>> >>> by changing the Subject line, and not retaining the reply-to context in >>> the mai

Re: [CentOS] Re: (Global/Any) setting for "show hidden files?" - SOLVED

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 8-26-2008 4:16 AM Karanbir Singh spake the following: >> >> by changing the Subject line, and not retaining the reply-to context in >> the mailheaders, you end up creating a new thread each time. so can you not >> do that

[CentOS] Re: apache

on 8-26-2008 8:11 AM Mad Unix spake the following: Can I do the following Ian's previous post about setting variables in /etc/sysconfig/httpd is correct. Define the vars in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, and make sure you export them there. This is the intended use and the 'redhat' me

[CentOS] Re: YumRepo Warning: not using ftp, http[s], or file for repos, skipping - 5 is not a valid release or hasnt been released yet

on 8-26-2008 9:06 AM Rudi Ahlers spake the following: On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Hi Ralph, That is one full line: #mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releasever&arch=$basearch&

Re: [CentOS] Re: YumRepo Warning: not using ftp, http[s], or file for repos, skipping - 5 is not a valid release or hasnt been released yet

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Hi Ralph, >> >> That is one full line: >> >> #mirrorlist= >> http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releasever&arch=$basearch&repo=addons< >> http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releasever&arch=$basearch&repo=addons

[CentOS] Re: Slow Xen on CentOS 5.2?

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Eduardo Grosclaude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After I updated the system, Xen takes an unusable startup time. Every Guess what, Virtual Dave (http://wiki.xdroop.com/space/VMware/Server/Clock+on+CentOS) is right. Just disable cpuspeed. Thank you, Virtual Dave --

[CentOS] Re: (Global/Any) setting for "show hidden files?" - SOLVED

on 8-26-2008 4:16 AM Karanbir Singh spake the following: MHR wrote: On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 11:33 AM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is there a setting somewhere in the "global" arena of CentOS that controls whether or not "hidden" (.prefixed) files are displayed in file lists? Never mind -

[CentOS] Re: YumRepo Warning: not using ftp, http[s], or file for repos, skipping - 5 is not a valid release or hasnt been released yet

Hi Ralph, That is one full line: #mirrorlist=http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releasever&arch=$basearch&repo=addons But as you can see, it's commented out, so it shouldn't even be read, right? What does

Re: [CentOS] Re: YumRepo Warning: not using ftp, http[s], or file for repos, skipping - 5 is not a valid release or hasnt been released yet

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Ralph Angenendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > Rudi Ahlers wrote: > > > #mirrorlist= > > > > http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releasever&arch=$basearch&repo=os > > Is that one line or are those two lines? > > Ralph > > _

Re: [CentOS] Re: YumRepo Warning: not using ftp, http[s], or file for repos, skipping - 5 is not a valid release or hasnt been released yet

Rudi Ahlers wrote: > > #mirrorlist= > > http://mirrorlist.centos.org/?release=$releasever&arch=$basearch&repo=os Is that one line or are those two lines? Ralph pgppJW49Ifld5.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http

[CentOS] Re: Re: Problems with perl upgrading CentOS 5.1 to 5.2 [SOLVED?]

Taking a view into perl packages (classes) needed by spamassassin (qmail-toaster package), I saw that there are a script that install the classes using CPAN. I discovered that CPAN installed packages goes into a diferent directory that distro ones. The workaround (solution) I found is rename this

[CentOS] Re: YumRepo Warning: not using ftp, http[s], or file for repos, skipping - 5 is not a valid release or hasnt been released yet

On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Rudi Ahlers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all > > Does anyone know what causes this error? > I have setup a local CentOS repository, with mrepo, and can succesfully use > it for updates & installation of just about anything. Yet, this error comes > up. > > Here's

[CentOS] Re: OT: Google Earth, v.4.3.7284.3916 (beta) on CentOS 5.2 (32 bit)

on 8-25-2008 1:25 PM William L. Maltby spake the following: I guess I need to finish reading the thread before I reply. ;-D He-he! And don't let things distract you from snipping! ;-) Got it! More snipping, less sipping! ;-P With good cheer, -- MailScanner is like deodorant...

Re: [CentOS] Re: OT: Google Earth, v.4.3.7284.3916 (beta) on CentOS 5.2 (32 bit)

On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 3:25 PM, William L. Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 12:49 -0700, Scott Silva wrote: >> > >> >> >> > Try cat /proc/cpuinfo |grep sse2 >> > >> I guess I need to finish reading the thread before I reply. ;-D > > He-he! And don't let things distract

Re: [CentOS] Re: OT: Google Earth, v.4.3.7284.3916 (beta) on CentOS 5.2 (32 bit)

On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Scott Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 8-22-2008 6:00 PM Lanny Marcus spake the following: >> >> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Lanny Marcus >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 3:48 PM, MHR >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >