On 30/03/2008, Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I will first have to find a new vga card to try that..
> But I do know it isn't the monitor, as the three other boxes connected
> to it never show this sort of behaviour..
>
> I have found a way to provoke the flashes, by the way;
> simply
Alan Bartlett wrote:
Then surely it comes down to an issue with either *your* video
controller card or monitor. Please now try the obvious, follow
scientific procedures and swap them out, one at a time. Clearly, it is a
hardware problem and nothing to do with CentOS - unless you can convince
m
On 29/03/2008, Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't think that sounds like the same error at all, my screen switches
> off and depending on what is going on doesn't switch back on right away
> (like that one time when some process didn't start up and I had to ssh
> in to poke it)
>
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Alan Bartlett wrote:
Please remember that there are also active CentOS fora. Perhaps this
may be
of interest:
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=12678&forum=37&post_id=41742#forumpost41742
That does indeed look exactly like what is being describe
Alan Bartlett wrote:
Please remember that there are also active CentOS fora. Perhaps this may be
of interest:
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=12678&forum=37&post_id=41742#forumpost41742
That does indeed look exactly like what is being described and they are
not fix
Please remember that there are also active CentOS fora. Perhaps this may be
of interest:
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=12678&forum=37&post_id=41742#forumpost41742
Alan.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
What happens when you reboot in "safe mode"?
What exactly do you mean by "safe mode"?
The monitor I have hooked up is a 15" LCD panel, by the way.
--
Cheers,
Morten
:wq
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos
Morten Nilsen wrote:
Morten Nilsen wrote:
Next time I reboot the system, I'll report back on the state of the
flashing..
Rebooted just now to test, and the flashing still happens..
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# uname -a
Linux washu3.4th-age.com 2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 #1 SMP Wed Mar 5 11:37:38
EST 2008 x
Morten Nilsen wrote:
Next time I reboot the system, I'll report back on the state of the
flashing..
Rebooted just now to test, and the flashing still happens..
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# uname -a
Linux washu3.4th-age.com 2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 #1 SMP Wed Mar 5 11:37:38
EST 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GN
Akemi Yagi wrote:
Well, if it is suspected that there are more duplicates in the rpm
database, you might want to follow the procedure detailed in this
forum post:
http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?viewmode=flat&topic_id=10139&forum=27
I've now gotten the dupes sorted out, and h
on 3-27-2008 11:36 AM Johnny Hughes spake the following:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Robert Nichols wrote:
Morten Nilsen wrote:
Robert Nichols wrote:
If you installed 5.0, you're missing a LOT of updates. The normal
update
mechanism should bring your machine up to 5.1 unless you've taken
action
to
on 3-27-2008 1:05 PM Morten Nilsen spake the following:
Scott Silva wrote:
The attached script should fix it up, but check it first, don't just
run it.
Your attachment got stripped, it seems..
Trying again...
--
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice qui
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Let me relate this to Windows :D
CentOS-5.1 and 5.2 and 5.3 are like XP, XP Service Pack 1, and XP
Service Pack 2.
what is wrong with the world today ?
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS m
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Alan Bartlett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I had previously looked at /etc/issue, which says "release 5 (Final)"..
>
> As I'm sure you're aware from Johnny Hughes recent posting to this list, the
> contents of /etc/issue will stay that way for the entire life of
> I had previously looked at /etc/issue, which says "release 5 (Final)"..
As I'm sure you're aware from Johnny Hughes recent posting to this list, the
contents of /etc/issue will stay that way for the entire life of CentOS 5.
# rpm -q centos-release
> centos-release-5-0.0.el5.centos.2
> centos-r
Scott Silva wrote:
The attached script should fix it up, but check it first, don't just run
it.
Your attachment got stripped, it seems..
--
Cheers,
Morten
:wq
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
on 3-27-2008 12:36 PM Morten Nilsen spake the following:
Alan Bartlett wrote:
If the command rpm -q centos-release returns
centos-release-5-1.0.el5.centos.1 then you *are* running CentOS 5
update 1.
I had previously looked at /etc/issue, which says "release 5 (Final)"..
# rpm -q centos-relea
Alan Bartlett wrote:
If the command rpm -q centos-release returns
centos-release-5-1.0.el5.centos.1 then you *are* running CentOS 5 update 1.
I had previously looked at /etc/issue, which says "release 5 (Final)"..
# rpm -q centos-release
centos-release-5-0.0.el5.centos.2
centos-release-5-1.0.e
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Robert Nichols wrote:
Morten Nilsen wrote:
Robert Nichols wrote:
If you installed 5.0, you're missing a LOT of updates. The normal
update
mechanism should bring your machine up to 5.1 unless you've taken
action
to lock it to the 5.0 release.
When I installed this box, 5
Scott Silva wrote:
on 3-27-2008 10:50 AM Rudi Ahlers spake the following:
Robert Nichols wrote:
The upgrade to 5.1 is seamless. Your actual version (the
replacement for
"$releasever" in the URL in the yum config file) is "5", not "5.0",
which
will always track the latest release. Sounds l
on 3-27-2008 10:50 AM Rudi Ahlers spake the following:
Robert Nichols wrote:
Morten Nilsen wrote:
Robert Nichols wrote:
If you installed 5.0, you're missing a LOT of updates. The normal
update
mechanism should bring your machine up to 5.1 unless you've taken
action
to lock it to the 5.0 rel
Robert Nichols wrote:
Morten Nilsen wrote:
Robert Nichols wrote:
If you installed 5.0, you're missing a LOT of updates. The normal
update
mechanism should bring your machine up to 5.1 unless you've taken
action
to lock it to the 5.0 release.
When I installed this box, 5.1 wasn't out yet..
on 3-27-2008 9:46 AM Morten Nilsen spake the following:
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
'yum remove libgnomesomething' will do the depsolving for you (just
like 'yum install').
I don't really mind doing it manually, it yields greater control..
Yum gives you a list of what it wants to do and then
Morten Nilsen wrote:
Robert Nichols wrote:
If you installed 5.0, you're missing a LOT of updates. The normal update
mechanism should bring your machine up to 5.1 unless you've taken action
to lock it to the 5.0 release.
When I installed this box, 5.1 wasn't out yet..
And, no I haven't taken a
Morten Nilsen wrote:
Robert Nichols wrote:
If you installed 5.0, you're missing a LOT of updates. The normal update
mechanism should bring your machine up to 5.1 unless you've taken action
to lock it to the 5.0 release.
When I installed this box, 5.1 wasn't out yet..
And, no I haven't taken a
On 27/03/2008, Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When I installed this box, 5.1 wasn't out yet..
> And, no I haven't taken any kind of action to lock it to 5.0.
>
> I have run "yum update" a few times, but I don't see any signs of it
> wanting to upgrade to 5.1..
If the command rpm -q
Robert Nichols wrote:
If you installed 5.0, you're missing a LOT of updates. The normal update
mechanism should bring your machine up to 5.1 unless you've taken action
to lock it to the 5.0 release.
When I installed this box, 5.1 wasn't out yet..
And, no I haven't taken any kind of action to l
Morten Nilsen wrote:
- Why does the screen flicker on and off several times during boot and
when logging in?
In the kernel distributed with RHEL5 / CentOS 5.0, a driver was accidentally
omitted (CONFIG_FB_VESA). This makes the text mode display wonky on some
common hardware. IIRC, this was
28 matches
Mail list logo
