Re: [CentOS] Re: Local mirroring of the CentOS repos

2007-10-12 Thread Ralph Angenendt
John R Pierce wrote: um, centos/(vers)/updates/(arch)/RPMS generally has just the latest RPM for each updated rpm, except the kernels. I see very little redundancy there. That's not completely true: tomcat5-5.5.23-0jpp.1.0.3.el5.i386.rpm tomcat5-5.5.23-0jpp.1.0.4.el5.i386.rpm

Re: [CentOS] Re: Local mirroring of the CentOS repos

2007-10-12 Thread Ashley M. Kirchner
Scott Silva wrote: With the space crunch on the CentOS mirrors, I don't know why they don't just have the latest files in the updates mirrors and move all the older stuff to vault. If someone wants an older release of a file, you need to get it directly anyway. It wouldn't save a ton of space,

[CentOS] Re: Local mirroring of the CentOS repos

2007-10-11 Thread Scott Silva
on 10/11/2007 7:16 AM Ashley M. Kirchner spake the following: Kai Schaetzl wrote: Thanks, but this will still download and keep *all* updates for a platform. If they exist on the mirror, then yes. However, anything that gets removed from the mirror you're using, will also get deleted from

Re: [CentOS] Re: Local mirroring of the CentOS repos

2007-10-11 Thread Mark Foster
Scott Silva wrote: With the space crunch on the CentOS mirrors, I don't know why they don't just have the latest files in the updates mirrors and move all the older stuff to vault. If someone wants an older release of a file, you need to get it directly anyway. It wouldn't save a ton of space,

Re: [CentOS] Re: Local mirroring of the CentOS repos

2007-10-11 Thread John R Pierce
Scott Silva wrote: With the space crunch on the CentOS mirrors, I don't know why they don't just have the latest files in the updates mirrors and move all the older stuff to vault. If someone wants an older release of a file, you need to get it directly anyway. It wouldn't save a ton of space,