Re: [CentOS] Re: centos] CentOS 5 on IA64

2007-09-23 Thread James A. Peltier
Karanbir Singh wrote: What sort of machines do you have that you could test on ? there is an ia64 distro spin running right now, so depending on how that works out there will be an installable tree ( but no isos ) available for testing shortly. SGI Altix 3700 64P x 64GB, SGI Prism 32P x 32GB S

Re: [CentOS] Re: centos] CentOS 5 on IA64

2007-09-22 Thread Karanbir Singh
James A. Peltier wrote: Sorry to be a bit of a stickler, but can we please change the topic for each architecture. I am monitoring all posts containing IA64 or Itanium to see when CentOS 5 support will be available and this thread has been throwing *a lot* of false positives. What sort of mac

Re: [CentOS] Re: centos] CentOS 5 on IA64

2007-09-17 Thread James A. Peltier
Sorry to be a bit of a stickler, but can we please change the topic for each architecture. I am monitoring all posts containing IA64 or Itanium to see when CentOS 5 support will be available and this thread has been throwing *a lot* of false positives. Thanks, and again, sorry to be so sticky. __

Re: [CentOS] Re: centos] CentOS 5 on IA64

2007-09-16 Thread Karanbir Singh
Lamar Owen wrote: > I didn't mention the SUN E5500 and E6500 we might have something that runs on those boxs soon :! -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman

Re: [CentOS] Re: centos] CentOS 5 on IA64

2007-09-14 Thread Lamar Owen
[Administrivia: should this be on CentOS-devel instead of the regular CentOS list? If so, please redirect.] On Friday 14 September 2007, Lamar Owen wrote: > Whew. As typical, you have thoroughly thought through things. Let me see > if the beast will power up and whether the OS/2 console proces

[OT] Re: [CentOS] Re: centos] CentOS 5 on IA64

2007-09-14 Thread Lamar Owen
[Veering off-topic; mods, I'll not continue this branch of the thread much longer] On Friday 14 September 2007, John R Pierce wrote: > I've gotten away with running some 208V equipment on a 120V UPS using a > step-up transformer which had a 208V tap (and 220V, 240V). Of course, > 3000VA is g

Re: [CentOS] Re: centos] CentOS 5 on IA64

2007-09-14 Thread John R Pierce
Lamar Owen wrote: If someone would like to donate a midsized 208VAC-capable (single-phase OK, but has to be 208 and not 240, or at least jumperable) UPS to the effort, about a 3000VA unit or so, that would help matters considerably! All my good UPS's are 120VAC at this point (my one good 208VA

Re: [CentOS] Re: centos] CentOS 5 on IA64

2007-09-14 Thread Lamar Owen
On Tuesday 11 September 2007, R P Herrold wrote: > On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Lamar Owen wrote: > > What is the minimum for actual hardware? I have a small > > s390 here that I've been looking for a reason to power up. > > What sort of access is needed? > > Goodness ... the Stuff you have in your closet

[CentOS] Re: centos] CentOS 5 on IA64

2007-09-11 Thread R P Herrold
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Lamar Owen wrote: What is the minimum for actual hardware? I have a small s390 here that I've been looking for a reason to power up. What sort of access is needed? Goodness ... the Stuff you have in your closet at PARI. Best as I had roughed out plans for a builder some