Re: [CentOS] Re: kernels and irc

2008-06-06 Thread Michael Simpson
On 6/5/08, Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Scott Silva wrote: > > > on 6-5-2008 8:30 AM James Bunnell spake the following: > > > > > > i do pay for rhel. i made the mistake of converting to centos. damage is > > > done. on the next major upgrade, i will return to rhel and will not >

RE: [CentOS] Re: kernels and irc

2008-06-05 Thread Ross S. W. Walker
Scott Silva wrote: > on 6-5-2008 8:30 AM James Bunnell spake the following: > > > > i do pay for rhel. i made the mistake of converting to centos. damage is > > done. on the next major upgrade, i will return to rhel and will not > > professionally recommend centos either privately,personally, o

[CentOS] Re: kernels and irc

2008-06-05 Thread Tom Diehl
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, James Bunnell wrote: On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 18:36 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote: James Bunnell wrote: On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 17:00 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote: On May 22 it was estimated that it would take 3 weeks. Did you really need an update on that? i only asked. an ans

[CentOS] Re: kernels and irc

2008-06-05 Thread Scott Silva
on 6-5-2008 8:30 AM James Bunnell spake the following: On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 09:57 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: James Bunnell wrote: > I was in the #centos-social channel and simply stated that I noticed > CentOS 3-4 were getting a lot of updates. I also stated that the CentOS > 5 was one kernel