On 6/5/08, Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scott Silva wrote:
>
> > on 6-5-2008 8:30 AM James Bunnell spake the following:
> > >
> > > i do pay for rhel. i made the mistake of converting to centos. damage is
> > > done. on the next major upgrade, i will return to rhel and will not
>
Scott Silva wrote:
> on 6-5-2008 8:30 AM James Bunnell spake the following:
> >
> > i do pay for rhel. i made the mistake of converting to centos. damage is
> > done. on the next major upgrade, i will return to rhel and will not
> > professionally recommend centos either privately,personally, o
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, James Bunnell wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 18:36 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
James Bunnell wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 17:00 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
On May 22 it was estimated that it would take 3 weeks. Did you really need an
update on that?
i only asked. an ans
on 6-5-2008 8:30 AM James Bunnell spake the following:
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 09:57 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
James Bunnell wrote:
> I was in the #centos-social channel and simply stated that I noticed
> CentOS 3-4 were getting a lot of updates. I also stated that the CentOS
> 5 was one kernel
4 matches
Mail list logo