On 5/21/2013 5:55 AM, Yves S. Garret wrote:
> http://www.serverfocus.org/reiserfs-vs-ext4-vs-xfs-vs-zfs-vs-btrfs
>
> ...
> In the above link you can find comparisons between the various file systems,
> their advantages and disadvantages. Perhaps you can find something more
> contemporary that can
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Woehrle Hartmut SBB CFF FFS (Extern) <
hartmut.woeh...@sbb.ch> wrote:
> >Hi All.
> >
> >What is the status of ReiserFS in CentOS at the moment? I have some
> servers which use it as a loadable kernel module. I am thinking about a
> filesystem for database >systems
>Hi All.
>
>What is the status of ReiserFS in CentOS at the moment? I have some servers
>which use it as a loadable kernel module. I am thinking about a filesystem for
>database >systems and would like to know if ReiserFS will be maintained in
>CentOS/Linux kernel in the future?
Since Hans Reise
Am Tue, 21 May 2013 14:11:31 +0200
schrieb Rafał Radecki :
> Hi All.
>
> What is the status of ReiserFS in CentOS at the moment? I have some
> servers which use it as a loadable kernel module. I am thinking about
> a filesystem for database systems and would like to know if ReiserFS
> will be mai
Hi All.
What is the status of ReiserFS in CentOS at the moment? I have some servers
which use it as a loadable kernel module. I am thinking about a filesystem
for database systems and would like to know if ReiserFS will be maintained
in CentOS/Linux kernel in the future?
Best regards,
Rafal.
Bill Campbell wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>Is their any gotcha when using ResiserFs as a file system?
>
> We used reiserfs for a while on SuSE systems thinking that it
> would be OK because it was the default. Unfortunately I have had
> several occassions whe
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 00:03 -0800, Bill Campbell wrote:
>
> Bill
> --
> INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC
> URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way
> FAX:(206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676
>
> DOS: n.
On 1/28/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is their any gotcha when using ResiserFs as a file system?
Aside from not being supported by the CentOS kernels in base/updates,
I would recommend against it. No major distributor seems to put
development effort into reiserfs anymore and I
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Is their any gotcha when using ResiserFs as a file system?
We used reiserfs for a while on SuSE systems thinking that it
would be OK because it was the default. Unfortunately I have had
several occassions where we had massive data loss with r
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is their any gotcha when using ResiserFs as a file system?
You have to be careful with which OSes you use it with, for example, you
can't really get a "base install" with ReiserFS, nor a default RescueCD
with it...you'd want to choose a partition to dedicate f
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is their any gotcha when using ResiserFs as a file system?
other than not being supported by standard CentOS kernels?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi,
Is their any gotcha when using ResiserFs as a file system?
--
Thanks
http://www.911networks.com
When the network has to work
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
12 matches
Mail list logo
