Re: [CentOS] Replacing sendmail with postfix

2019-09-23 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Monday, September 23, 2019 9:14 AM -0700 Paul Heinlein wrote: You can reject high-scoring spam during the SMTP transactions. It also allows per-user preferences/Bayes rules to run, with the caveat that a message addressed to multiple users can't take advantage of the per-user run. (Unlike

Re: [CentOS] Replacing sendmail with postfix

2019-09-23 Thread hw
On Saturday, September 21, 2019 3:14:12 PM CEST MAILIST wrote: > exim should also be considered. We have been using exim with CentOS > for at least 10 years. Right. I've been using exim for over 20 years and haven't had any issues with it. Exims documentation is outstanding and the mailing lis

Re: [CentOS] Replacing sendmail with postfix

2019-09-23 Thread Paul Heinlein
On Sat, 21 Sep 2019, Kenneth Porter wrote: I've been doing sendmail -> MIMEDefang -> SpamAssassin/clamd and then sendmail -> procmail -> SpamAssassin. Yeah, SA gets run twice, once to reject scores > 10 by the milter and then again by each user to incorporate their Bayes scores. I'd love to ru

Re: [CentOS] Replacing sendmail with postfix

2019-09-21 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Saturday, September 21, 2019 9:59 PM +1200 Peter wrote: I use spamassassin via amavisd-new, with messages going postfix -> amavisd -> second postfix (all via SMTP). This is a good setup, but you may find that you can eliminate the second postfix step there and go postfix -> amavisd-new

Re: [CentOS] Replacing sendmail with postfix

2019-09-21 Thread MAILIST
exim should also be considered. We have been using exim with CentOS for at least 10 years. Todd Merriman ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Replacing sendmail with postfix

2019-09-21 Thread Peter
On 21/09/19 9:07 AM, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Kenneth Porter said: Perfect. I think the only other significant customizations I have are lines to use the MIMEDefang and OpenDKIM milters. When last I looked into migrating, I recall that Postfix handled milters just fine. Milters wo

Re: [CentOS] Replacing sendmail with postfix (was: deprecations leading up to C8)

2019-09-20 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Kenneth Porter said: > Perfect. I think the only other significant customizations I have > are lines to use the MIMEDefang and OpenDKIM milters. When last I > looked into migrating, I recall that Postfix handled milters just > fine. Milters work a little different under postfix

Re: [CentOS] Replacing sendmail with postfix (was: deprecations leading up to C8)

2019-09-20 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Friday, September 20, 2019 2:06 PM -0500 Chris Adams wrote: How would you implement the section here titled "Sendmail workaround" using Postfix? http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#recipient_delimiter Perfect. I think the only other significant customizations I have are lines to u

Re: [CentOS] Replacing sendmail with postfix (was: deprecations leading up to C8)

2019-09-20 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Kenneth Porter said: > How would you implement the section here titled "Sendmail > workaround" using Postfix? http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#recipient_delimiter -- Chris Adams ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https:

Re: [CentOS] Replacing sendmail with postfix (was: deprecations leading up to C8)

2019-09-20 Thread Kenneth Porter
--On Friday, September 20, 2019 3:49 PM +0200 Alexander Dalloz wrote: Postfix has a lot of features build-in Sendmail hasn't. It is feature rich and actively developed. Many things you would need a milter or complex cf style coding for with Sendmail you can configure in Postfix in a simple way