Hi,
Up until recently, I've been running Wine 1.6.2 on my workstation under
Slackware64 14.1. I used it to emulate a handful of legacy apps that ran
under Windows XP. They worked perfectly with that setup.
After migrating the workstation from Slackware to CentOS 7, I installed
the Wine packa
On 07/03/15 16:40, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Up until recently, I've been running Wine 1.6.2 on my workstation under
> Slackware64 14.1. I used it to emulate a handful of legacy apps that ran
> under Windows XP. They worked perfectly with that setup.
>
> After migrating the workstation from
Le 07/03/2015 18:24, Ned Slider a écrit :
I'm guessing you are either going to need to build/install a 32-bit
version of wine or will need to find 64-bit versions of your Windows
applications.
Is it possible to build a 32-bit version of Wine on 64-bit CentOS 7 ? A
curt "yes" or "no" will do. E
On 07/03/15 22:01, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Le 07/03/2015 18:24, Ned Slider a écrit :
>> I'm guessing you are either going to need to build/install a 32-bit
>> version of wine or will need to find 64-bit versions of your Windows
>> applications.
>
> Is it possible to build a 32-bit version of Wine o
arch, 2015 22:45:58
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Running the Wine emulator on CentOS 7
> On 07/03/15 22:01, Niki Kovacs wrote:
>> Le 07/03/2015 18:24, Ned Slider a écrit :
>>> I'm guessing you are either going to need to build/install a 32-bit
>>> version of win
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/03/15 01:53, Nux! wrote:
> Niki,
>
> There are some 32bit RPMs (slightly older) here:
> http://arrfab.net/attic/RPMS/7/x86_64/
>
> HTH Lucian
>
> -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux! www.nux.ro
>
Damn, I built th
On 03/09/2015 04:43 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
> On 08/03/15 01:53, Nux! wrote:
>> Niki,
>
>> There are some 32bit RPMs (slightly older) here:
>> http://arrfab.net/attic/RPMS/7/x86_64/
>
>> HTH Lucian
>
>> -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
>> Nux! www.nux.ro
>
>
> Damn,
Le 09/03/2015 13:02, Johnny Hughes a écrit :
I was just getting ready to build those, I need them:) .. how about we
put them (or newer ones, if available) in i686 extras.
On a side note, I wonder when - and if - a 32-bit version of CentOS will
eventually become available. I'm managing a small
Le 08/03/2015 01:53, Nux! a écrit :
There are some 32bit RPMs (slightly older) here:
http://arrfab.net/attic/RPMS/7/x86_64/
I tried to install these, but I ran into some trouble. Here's what I
tried to do.
I'm using the yum-priorities plugin. The official CentOS repos are
configured with a
On 03/09/2015 10:00 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Le 09/03/2015 13:02, Johnny Hughes a écrit :
>> I was just getting ready to build those, I need them:) .. how about we
>> put them (or newer ones, if available) in i686 extras.
>
> On a side note, I wonder when - and if - a 32-bit version of CentOS wil
Le 10/03/2015 01:52, Johnny Hughes a écrit :
We really should have this very soon after the 7.1 x86_64 release. I am
building all the packages for both as we do 7.1.
But, so far the new kernel is not building 32 bit:(
Thank you for your quick response. I am looking forward to that very much.
On 03/10/2015 12:28 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Le 10/03/2015 01:52, Johnny Hughes a écrit :
>> We really should have this very soon after the 7.1 x86_64 release. I am
>> building all the packages for both as we do 7.1.
>>
>> But, so far the new kernel is not building 32 bit:(
>
> Thank you for your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/03/15 17:24, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Le 08/03/2015 01:53, Nux! a écrit :
>> There are some 32bit RPMs (slightly older) here:
>> http://arrfab.net/attic/RPMS/7/x86_64/
>
> I tried to install these, but I ran into some trouble. Here's what
> I tried
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/03/15 16:00, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Le 09/03/2015 13:02, Johnny Hughes a écrit :
>> I was just getting ready to build those, I need them:) .. how
>> about we put them (or newer ones, if available) in i686 extras.
>
> On a side note, I wonder when
Le 10/03/2015 12:12, Fabian Arrotin a écrit :
While it "works" it's quite slow so probably better then to stick with
CentOS 6 and wait for something lighter than Gnome3/Gnome-shell as
Desktop Environment (xfce/mate/$other)
Until recently I've been using a beefed-up Xfce-on-steroids for older
h
Le 10/03/2015 12:08, Fabian Arrotin a écrit :
Yeah, as said, I built those initially, but haven't tracked those, so
if Epel updated some of the required packages, you'll have that issue.
Feel free to just exclude those conflicting packages from epel.repo
and that would normally work :
exclude=win
16 matches
Mail list logo