MHR wrote:
Good info here:
http://www.seagate.com/ww//index.jsp?locale=en-US&name=SATA_Troubleshooter_-_BIOS_Configuration&vgnextoid=83744a3cdde5c010VgnVCM10dd04090aRCRD
I got a 404 on that one.
A character 'v' got lost in translation. For posterity, the correct URL is
http://www.seagat
>I got a 404 on that one.
Watch the wrap, or search google for "sata configuration enhanced"
it's the first hit...
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Joseph L. Casale
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Should we go ahead and reset to AHCI and reinstall (again)? Or will
>>"enhanced" be enough for the long run?
>
> Enhanced/AHCI for SATA drives under Linux.
>
> Good info here:
> http://www.seagate.com/ww//index.jsp?local
>Should we go ahead and reset to AHCI and reinstall (again)? Or will
>"enhanced" be enough for the long run?
Enhanced/AHCI for SATA drives under Linux.
Good info here:
http://www.seagate.com/ww//index.jsp?locale=en-US&name=SATA_Troubleshooter_-_BIOS_Configuration&vgnextoid=83744a3cdde5c010VgnVCM
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 6:39 AM, Joseph L. Casale
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Heh, Actually you don't "have two SATA controllers for a single disk drive"
> but you have two controllers.
>
Well, yes, of course! ;-)
> As the last poster suggested, use AHCI for Linux.
>
Interesting. I just spoke
>>>What am I missing? Is it odd to have two SATA controllers for a
>>>single disk drive, or is that at all relevant?
>>
>> You don't, it would be odd :)
>
>Actually, we do - it is configured to have two SATA controllers in it.
Heh, Actually you don't "have two SATA controllers for a single disk d
MHR wrote:
"enhanced," the other is set to IDE, but can be set to RAID or AHCI.
I've used CentOS5 with many different mobos and SATA. I always configure
SATA to AHCI if the mobo/bios allows it. I have not seen any problems
with AHCI.
A couple machines with both PATA and SATA has brought so
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 5:35 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Joseph L. Casale
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Is your Mass Storage Controller configured as IDE instead of AHCI?
>>
> It's "compatible" as IDE.
>
It has two settings here - one is "compatible" (th
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Joseph L. Casale
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>What am I missing? Is it odd to have two SATA controllers for a
>>single disk drive, or is that at all relevant?
>
> You don't, it would be odd :)
Actually, we do - it is configured to have two SATA controllers in it.
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Joseph L. Casale
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is your Mass Storage Controller configured as IDE instead of AHCI?
>
It's "compatible" as IDE.
>>What am I missing? Is it odd to have two SATA controllers for a
>>single disk drive, or is that at all relevant?
>
> You
>/var/log/messages.1-Nov 1 18:19:00 Centos5 kernel: hda: status
>timeout: status=0xd0 { Busy }
>/var/log/messages.1:Nov 1 18:19:00 Centos5 kernel: ide: failed opcode
>was: unknown
>/var/log/messages.1-Nov 1 18:19:00 Centos5 kernel: hda: no DRQ after
>issuing MULTWRITE_EXT
>/var/log/messages.1-No
We have a new machine here that we are trying to use for CentOS as a
base for our primary application. Although I do not have direct
access to the physical machine, I have begun looking into it remotely
(via ssh) to see why we are getting the following errors periodically:
/var/log/messages.1-Nov
12 matches
Mail list logo
