On 10/18/2014 8:06 AM, Arun Khan wrote:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Can this package coesist with the current Samba package, or do I need to
remove the CentOS Samba package first?
Both packages would want to use the same ports netbios ports.
I understand that. But i
On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
> Can this package coesist with the current Samba package, or do I need to
> remove the CentOS Samba package first?
Both packages would want to use the same ports netbios ports.
-- Arun Khan
___
Ce
On 10/17/2014 3:54 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 03:51:39PM -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 10/17/2014 3:32 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 01:22:46PM -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 15:12:30 -0400
Bowie Bailey wrote:
That looked great until I
On Fri, October 17, 2014 2:54 pm, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 03:51:39PM -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>> On 10/17/2014 3:32 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
>> >On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 01:22:46PM -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
>> >>On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 15:12:30 -0400
>> >>Bowie Bailey wrote:
>>
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 03:51:39PM -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 10/17/2014 3:32 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> >On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 01:22:46PM -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> >>On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 15:12:30 -0400
> >>Bowie Bailey wrote:
> >>
> >>>That looked great until I got signed in and realized th
On 10/17/2014 3:32 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 01:22:46PM -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 15:12:30 -0400
Bowie Bailey wrote:
That looked great until I got signed in and realized that they do not
yet have CentOS 7 packages...
I don't need this so I didn't regi
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 01:22:46PM -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 15:12:30 -0400
> Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
> > That looked great until I got signed in and realized that they do not
> > yet have CentOS 7 packages...
>
> I don't need this so I didn't register and so on, but I'm wonder
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 15:12:30 -0400
Bowie Bailey wrote:
> That looked great until I got signed in and realized that they do not
> yet have CentOS 7 packages...
I don't need this so I didn't register and so on, but I'm wondering if they
offer a source rpm package on that site that you might be ab
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 10/17/2014 2:56 PM, m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> I just installed a CentOS 7 server and ran into a problem with Samba and
> the
> "force user" option. Apparently, there was a fix for some "force user"
> is
On 10/17/2014 2:56 PM, m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Bowie Bailey wrote:
I just installed a CentOS 7 server and ran into a problem with Samba and the
"force user" option. Apparently, there was a fix for some "force user"
issues in the 4.1.6 release.
Is there any likelihood of an
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014, Bowie Bailey wrote:
I just installed a CentOS 7 server and ran into a problem with Samba and the
"force user" option. Apparently, there was a fix for some "force user"
issues in the 4.1.6 release.
Is there any likelihood of an update from upstream? If not, is there anot
I just installed a CentOS 7 server and ran into a problem with Samba and
the "force user" option. Apparently, there was a fix for some "force
user" issues in the 4.1.6 release.
Is there any likelihood of an update from upstream? If not, is there
another repo that provides a more up-to-date v
12 matches
Mail list logo
