On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 18:03 +0530, Arun Khan wrote:
> Scientific Linux 6 is based on RHEL 6 with add-ons for scientific computing.
>
> FWIW, the Admin tools etc. are pretty much the same as in RHEL, so are
> the base packages.
Just wondering how much of SL and C are interchangeable within the s
On 03/04/2011 12:40 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> mark, *not* looking forward to a major upgrade of all these
> machines
Heh, neither am I. 5.5 is trucking along just fine on many though, so I
don't expect to actually rebuild many. I'll probably roll out new
machines as CentOS 6 once I f
David Sommerseth wrote:
> On 04/03/11 16:59, Digimer wrote:
>> On 03/04/2011 07:35 AM, carlopmart wrote:
>>> On 03/04/2011 01:33 PM, Arun Khan wrote:
I know this is the CentOS list. However, as there has been some
interest in CentOS 6.0 (RHEL 6), I thought I'd share the news here.
>
On 04/03/11 16:59, Digimer wrote:
> On 03/04/2011 07:35 AM, carlopmart wrote:
>> On 03/04/2011 01:33 PM, Arun Khan wrote:
>>> I know this is the CentOS list. However, as there has been some
>>> interest in CentOS 6.0 (RHEL 6), I thought I'd share the news here.
>>>
>>> Scientific Linux 6 is based
On 03/04/2011 07:35 AM, carlopmart wrote:
> On 03/04/2011 01:33 PM, Arun Khan wrote:
>> I know this is the CentOS list. However, as there has been some
>> interest in CentOS 6.0 (RHEL 6), I thought I'd share the news here.
>>
>> Scientific Linux 6 is based on RHEL 6 with add-ons for scientific com
Anyway, this was an information by the OP and by itself ok, although I
guess everybody already knew it. But please try to refrain from making it
another longwinding thread. Not aimed at anyone particular, you are just
the last in the thread I have here. Thanks :-)
Kai
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 07:44:46AM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
> Now, now, be nice. It's nice to know if another open source knowledge
> has achieved a goal. It also provides an early testing platform for
> people who want to run some behavior comparisons. For example, the
> format of the "k
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 7:35 AM, carlopmart wrote:
>>>
>> And?? Why do you want to start a new flame??
That was certainly not the intent. Pls. see below.
> Now, now, be nice. It's nice to know if another open source knowledge
> has achi
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 7:35 AM, carlopmart wrote:
> On 03/04/2011 01:33 PM, Arun Khan wrote:
>> I know this is the CentOS list. However, as there has been some
>> interest in CentOS 6.0 (RHEL 6), I thought I'd share the news here.
>>
>> Scientific Linux 6 is based on RHEL 6 with add-ons for scien
On 03/04/2011 01:33 PM, Arun Khan wrote:
> I know this is the CentOS list. However, as there has been some
> interest in CentOS 6.0 (RHEL 6), I thought I'd share the news here.
>
> Scientific Linux 6 is based on RHEL 6 with add-ons for scientific computing.
>
> FWIW, the Admin tools etc. are prett
I know this is the CentOS list. However, as there has been some
interest in CentOS 6.0 (RHEL 6), I thought I'd share the news here.
Scientific Linux 6 is based on RHEL 6 with add-ons for scientific computing.
FWIW, the Admin tools etc. are pretty much the same as in RHEL, so are
the base package
11 matches
Mail list logo
