On Wed, 2015-10-21 at 21:20 +0200, Yamaban wrote:
> TL;DR:
TL;DQ?
--
mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 10/21/2015 12:20 PM, Yamaban wrote:
TL;DR: Preload openssl from non-standard location for closed-source
app only.
Hmm, how about taking the content of the openssl098e package, put
it into a directory relative to the closed source software (e.g. /opt),
Totally unnecessary. The openssl098e
On 10/21/2015 11:58 AM, Nick Bright wrote:
My concern is that, with the compatibility package installed, could
this present vulnerabilities or compliance problems in Apache?
No. openssl098e libraries have a distinct path. Apache's mod_ssl will
not load them.
___
On 10/22/2015 07:18 AM, Nick Bright wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm working with a new CentOS 7 installation, moving a system up from
> CentOS 5 due to OpenSSL version 0.9.8e not meeting PCI Compliance
> requirements.
>
> However, while setting up the CentOS 7 environment one of the closed
> source a
Ok, I just forget that latest PCI DSS standard requires TLSv1.2 that is not
supported under CentOS/RHEL 5.
So, you are using https to transfer credit card data?
--
Eero
2015-10-21 22:37 GMT+03:00 Nick Bright :
> On 10/21/2015 2:34 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
>
>> Remember that rhel/centos backpor
Nick Bright wrote:
> On 10/21/2015 1:55 PM, Andrew Holway wrote:
>> Personally I would go round to that particular vendors office with a
>> pipe wrench and encourage them to do better however, unless this
>> It seems the PCI-DSS describe a set of simple rules to get IT managers
>> thinking but the
On 10/21/2015 2:34 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
Remember that rhel/centos backports fixes, so just looking version
number is not reliable way to detect security issues.
Eero
Indeed, though I can say on CentOS 5 the required configuration to be
PCI compliand is not valid in apache, and httpd will
Remember that rhel/centos backports fixes, so just looking version number
is not reliable way to detect security issues.
Eero
2015-10-21 21:18 GMT+03:00 Nick Bright :
> Greetings,
>
> I'm working with a new CentOS 7 installation, moving a system up from
> CentOS 5 due to OpenSSL version 0.9.8e n
I would guess the only way to ascertain that is with some rigorous testing.
Personally I find an alternative backup method.
On 21 October 2015 at 13:58, Nick Bright wrote:
> On 10/21/2015 1:55 PM, Andrew Holway wrote:
>
>> Personally I would go round to that particular vendors office with a pipe
On 10/21/2015 1:55 PM, Andrew Holway wrote:
Personally I would go round to that particular vendors office with a pipe
wrench and encourage them to do better however, unless this software is
transmitting credit card information then it seems that you could be
safe(ish) from the regulation standpoi
Personally I would go round to that particular vendors office with a pipe
wrench and encourage them to do better however, unless this software is
transmitting credit card information then it seems that you could be
safe(ish) from the regulation standpoint. It really depends on the location
of the m
Greetings,
I'm working with a new CentOS 7 installation, moving a system up from
CentOS 5 due to OpenSSL version 0.9.8e not meeting PCI Compliance
requirements.
However, while setting up the CentOS 7 environment one of the closed
source applications is requiring 0.9.8. The software vendor ha
12 matches
Mail list logo
