Brian Mathis wrote:
> You are being disingenuous here by selectively editing out the
> relevant quoted text from the same message above, which I will add
> back in as a quote here:
Disingenuous? Seems to me that it is a question of truth for you.
Once again. 'apache:apache' is a risk, but it is n
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:58, Olaf Mueller wrote:
> Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 06:39, Ralph Angenendt
>> wrote:
>>> apache:apache - at least that is the UID/GID the webserver runs
>>> under.
>>
>> That's wrong. If your files are owned by Apache, any user that
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Olaf Mueller wrote:
>> Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 06:39, Ralph Angenendt
>>> wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 10:20 +0200, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> I remember having setup some web servers on Debian, and the
> tradition was that everythi
Olaf Mueller wrote:
> Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 06:39, Ralph Angenendt
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 10:20 +0200, Niki Kovacs wrote:
I remember having setup some web servers on Debian, and the
tradition was that everything under /var/www/html (as in
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Olaf Mueller wrote:
> Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 06:39, Ralph Angenendt
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 10:20 +0200, Niki Kovacs wrote:
I remember having setup some web servers on Debian, and the
tradition was that everyt
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 06:39, Ralph Angenendt
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 10:20 +0200, Niki Kovacs wrote:
>>> I remember having setup some web servers on Debian, and the
>>> tradition was that everything under /var/www/html (as in this
>>> example) was to be o
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 06:39, Ralph Angenendt
wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 10:20 +0200, Niki Kovacs wrote:
>> I remember having setup some web servers on Debian, and the tradition
>> was that everything under /var/www/html (as in this example) was to be
>> owned by user www-data and group
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 6:39 AM, Ralph Angenendt
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 10:20 +0200, Niki Kovacs wrote:
>> I remember having setup some web servers on Debian, and the tradition
>> was that everything under /var/www/html (as in this example) was to be
>> owned by user www-data and group w
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 13:27 +0200, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Ralph Angenendt a écrit :
>
> >
> > apache:apache - at least that is the UID/GID the webserver runs under.
> >
> Thanks very much... and thumbs up to one of the authors. I really like
> the book.
That chapter was written by someone else
Jim Perrin a écrit :
>
> 2. Are you hosting static content or dynamic pages?
Both and neither :o)
I'm a system administrator for a series of public libraries here, and
hosting several dynamic sites on a dedicated server (running CentOS).
I'm just in one of my documentation phases, where I hav
Ralph Angenendt a écrit :
>
> apache:apache - at least that is the UID/GID the webserver runs under.
>
Thanks very much... and thumbs up to one of the authors. I really like
the book.
Niki
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.cento
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 4:20 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Hi,
> Q: what permissions should I define for these pages?
I'd say, the most restrictive permissions possible, that still allow
your web application to function. I'm a bit more security
conscious/paranoid than most though.
There are an array
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 10:20 +0200, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> I remember having setup some web servers on Debian, and the tradition
> was that everything under /var/www/html (as in this example) was to be
> owned by user www-data and group www-data.
>
> What's the "tradition" with RHEL/CentOS?
apach
Hi,
I'm currently sinking my teeth into the fine "Definitive Guide to
CentOS". Right now I'm reading the chapter about Apache. One thing
puzzles me: no mention is made of web page permissions.
Let's say I'm using Apache's default configuration for setting up the
most simple no-frills web serve
14 matches
Mail list logo
