Gabriel Tabares wrote:
> On 23/08/2010 13:28, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>
>>> Both files are the default ones from CentOS:
>>>
>>>
>> So what do the host names look like that the application
>> attempts to resolve, fully qualified or not? What does your
>> cli based query look like?
>
On 8/28/10 9:23 AM, Gabriel Tabares wrote:
>On 25/08/2010 17:44, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
>> Greetings,
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> On 8/23/2010 10:08 AM, Gabriel Tabares wrote:
>>>
>>> Some servers do, some don't.
>> Have you tried google's DNS servers
On 25/08/2010 14:39, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Gabriel Tabares wrote:
>> On 23/08/2010 21:25, Keith Roberts wrote:
>>> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Gabriel Tabares wrote:
From: Gabriel Tabares
On 23/08/2010 13:28, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> Both files are the default ones from CentOS:
On 25/08/2010 17:44, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On 8/23/2010 10:08 AM, Gabriel Tabares wrote:
>>
>> Some servers do, some don't.
> Have you tried google's DNS servers 8.8.8.8 IP and one more IP I can't
> recollect exactly
Hi everyone,
I am answering this here as I found a workaround.
I could not solve the solution when using the Juniper as the DNS server,
so I reverted to using bind and that fixed the issue.
Thanks for the help, everybody.
Regards,
Gabriel
> I've just joine the list as I am having an issue
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Les Mikesell wrote:
> To: centos@centos.org
> From: Les Mikesell
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem
>
> On 8/23/2010 10:08 AM, Gabriel Tabares wrote:
>>
>> One more thing, if this is the case, why does the nslookup respo
Greetings,
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 8/23/2010 10:08 AM, Gabriel Tabares wrote:
>
> Some servers do, some don't.
Have you tried google's DNS servers 8.8.8.8 IP and one more IP I can't
recollect exactly
Regards,
Rajagopal
_
On 8/23/2010 10:08 AM, Gabriel Tabares wrote:
>
> One more thing, if this is the case, why does the nslookup respond
> straight away? Is the destination server trying to somehow validate the
> host where the connection came from?
Some servers do, some don't. The ones that do are often just trying
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Gabriel Tabares
> One more thing, if this is the case, why does the nslookup respond
> straight away? Is the destination server trying to somehow validate the
> host where the connection came from?
It's entirely possible (and probable) that the mail server is
at
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Gabriel Tabares wrote:
> To: centos@centos.org
> From: Gabriel Tabares
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem
>
> On 23/08/2010 21:25, Keith Roberts wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Gabriel Tabares wrote:
>>
>>
>>&g
Gabriel Tabares wrote:
> On 23/08/2010 21:25, Keith Roberts wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Gabriel Tabares wrote:
>>> From: Gabriel Tabares
>>> On 23/08/2010 13:28, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>>>
> Both files are the default ones from CentOS:
> Keith, the issue happens resolving internal IP addre
On 8/25/10 7:26 AM, Gabriel Tabares wrote:
>
>> Not sure if it is RDNS.
>>
>> I had similar issues on Fedora, and for me it was to do with IP6.
>>
>> Konqueror web browser took ages to load a page. IIRC Firefox handled
>> it OK.
>>
>> Try Googling for 'uninstalling ipv6 linux'
>>
> I already tried
On 23/08/2010 21:25, Keith Roberts wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Gabriel Tabares wrote:
>
>
>> To: centos@centos.org
>> From: Gabriel Tabares
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem
>>
>> On 23/08/2010 13:28, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>&g
> Not sure if it is RDNS.
>
> I had similar issues on Fedora, and for me it was to do with IP6.
>
> Konqueror web browser took ages to load a page. IIRC Firefox handled
> it OK.
>
> Try Googling for 'uninstalling ipv6 linux'
>
I already tried that. The /etc/sysconfig/network has the IPV6_ENABLE=n
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Gabriel Tabares wrote:
> To: centos@centos.org
> From: Gabriel Tabares
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem
>
> On 23/08/2010 13:28, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>>> Both files are the default ones from CentOS:
>>>
>> S
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Tom H wrote:
To: CentOS mailing list
From: Tom H
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Slow domain resolution problem
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
The problems can sometimes be caused by not having reverse-DNS records for
your hosts. Can you resolve to names
On 23/08/2010 16:07, Giles Coochey wrote:
> On Mon, August 23, 2010 17:03, Gabriel Tabares wrote:
>
>> On 23/08/2010 14:48, Giles Coochey wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, August 23, 2010 15:43, Gabriel Tabares wrote:
>>>
>>>
On 23/08/2010 13:28, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
On 23/08/2010 15:56, Tom H wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
>
>> The problems can sometimes be caused by not having reverse-DNS records for
>> your hosts. Can you resolve to names (any name) from an IP address?
>> e.g. nslookup 10.2.9.2?
>>
>
One more th
On Mon, August 23, 2010 17:03, Gabriel Tabares wrote:
> On 23/08/2010 14:48, Giles Coochey wrote:
>> On Mon, August 23, 2010 15:43, Gabriel Tabares wrote:
>>
>>> On 23/08/2010 13:28, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>>>
>> The problems can sometimes be caused by not having reverse-DNS records
>> for
>> your
On 23/08/2010 14:48, Giles Coochey wrote:
> On Mon, August 23, 2010 15:43, Gabriel Tabares wrote:
>
>> On 23/08/2010 13:28, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>>
Both files are the default ones from CentOS:
>>> So what do the host names look like that the application
>>> att
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
>
> The problems can sometimes be caused by not having reverse-DNS records for
> your hosts. Can you resolve to names (any name) from an IP address?
> e.g. nslookup 10.2.9.2?
If this is a reverse-lookup problem and you can't have a
reverse-loo
On Mon, August 23, 2010 15:43, Gabriel Tabares wrote:
> On 23/08/2010 13:28, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>>> Both files are the default ones from CentOS:
>>>
>> So what do the host names look like that the application
>> attempts to resolve, fully qualified or not? What does your
>> cli based query loo
On 23/08/2010 13:28, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> Both files are the default ones from CentOS:
>>
> So what do the host names look like that the application
> attempts to resolve, fully qualified or not? What does your
> cli based query look like?
>
>
My resolv.conf is:
search mydomain.co
>Both files are the default ones from CentOS:
So what do the host names look like that the application
attempts to resolve, fully qualified or not? What does your
cli based query look like?
Post your resolve.conf.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.o
On 23/08/2010 13:20, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> /etc/nsswitch.conf and /etc/host.conf
Both files are the default ones from CentOS:
nsswitch.conf: (comments removed)
--
passwd: files
shadow: files
group: files
hosts: files dns
bootparams: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] fi
>The domain resolution is extremely slow from the application but doing
>an nslookup gives an immediate response. All the applications have the
>same issue, as do all the servers.
What does your /etc/nsswitch.conf and /etc/host.conf look like?
___
Cent
Hi everyone,
I've just joine the list as I am having an issue with our CentOS servers.
The domain resolution is extremely slow from the application but doing
an nslookup gives an immediate response. All the applications have the
same issue, as do all the servers.
I have been looking for the so
27 matches
Mail list logo
