On 24 November 2010 08:51, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> Yes, I used scp as a quick simple test. What would give me better
> performance though?
netcat, ftp. Anything that has low overhead (unlike encryption on a
single thread)
--
Hakan (m1fcj) - http://www.hititgunesi.org
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> Yes, I used scp as a quick simple test. What would give me better
> performance though?
Well, anything that doesn't encrypt would be worth a shot.
Here's a basic scp to /dev/null
scp /tmp/tempfile othermachine:/dev/null
tempfile
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:35 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>
>> r...@zaxen02.securehosting.co.za:/vm/xen/template/centos-5-x64-cpanel
>> r...@zaxen02.securehosting.co.za:/
>> r...@zaxen02.securehosting.co.za's password:
>> centos-5-x64-cpanel.tar.gz
>>
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> r...@zaxen02.securehosting.co.za:/vm/xen/template/centos-5-x64-cpanel
> r...@zaxen02.securehosting.co.za:/
> r...@zaxen02.securehosting.co.za's password:
> centos-5-x64-cpanel.tar.gz
>100% 1163MB
> 29.1MB
would like some input on this one please.
Two CentOS 5.5 XEN servers, with 1GB NIC's, connected to a 1GB switch
transfer files to each other at about 30MB/s between each other.
Both servers have the following setup:
CentOS 5.5 x64
XEN
1GB NIC's
7200rpm SATA HDD's
The hardware configuration can't
What kind of switch is it plugged into?
If it is managed, can you check the switch to see what was negotiated?
I've seen autoneg issues a lot on certain brands of switches (Nortel e.g.)
--
“Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV”
- Michael Pollan, author of "In Defense of
nate wrote:
> cen...@911networks.com wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have problem with a Centos 5.3 computer. The networking is very
>> slow. The networking card is a RealTek 1GigE.
>
> Get a better NIC, Realtek is absolute crap. CentOS is an
> "enterprise grade" OS, use an "enterprise grade" NIC such as
>
>
> Get a better NIC, Realtek is absolute crap. CentOS is an
> "enterprise grade" OS, use an "enterprise grade" NIC such as
> Intel or Broadcom.
>
> nate
>
+1
Realtek NICs are well know for being buggy in Linux specialy when a
lot packets are involved.
--
Linux User #452368
http://twitter.com/vp
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:25, wrote:
> I plugged an Ubuntu laptop on the same cable and port with an Intel
> GigE, and it's about 8 to 10 times faster. So the problem is likely to
> be with the CentOS config.
How did you test that? Opening a web page? Downloading a big file?
> Any suggest
cen...@911networks.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have problem with a Centos 5.3 computer. The networking is very
> slow. The networking card is a RealTek 1GigE.
Get a better NIC, Realtek is absolute crap. CentOS is an
"enterprise grade" OS, use an "enterprise grade" NIC such as
Intel or Broadcom.
nate
ethtool eth0
and
lsmod
would be helpful as well.
cen...@911networks.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have problem with a Centos 5.3 computer. The networking is very
> slow. The networking card is a RealTek 1GigE.
>
> I plugged an Ubuntu laptop on the same cable and port with an Intel
> GigE, and it's ab
lspci -v output whould be helpful
cen...@911networks.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have problem with a Centos 5.3 computer. The networking is very
> slow. The networking card is a RealTek 1GigE.
>
> I plugged an Ubuntu laptop on the same cable and port with an Intel
> GigE, and it's about 8 to 10 time
Hi,
I have problem with a Centos 5.3 computer. The networking is very
slow. The networking card is a RealTek 1GigE.
I plugged an Ubuntu laptop on the same cable and port with an Intel
GigE, and it's about 8 to 10 times faster. So the problem is likely to
be with the CentOS config.
Any suggestio
13 matches
Mail list logo
