-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/17/2014 09:08 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 2/17/2014 5:36 AM, Styma, Robert E (Robert) wrote:
>> Researching showed that there are a number of little selinux flags to set
>> to get samba to work. I went into /etc/selinux/config and turned off
>
On 2/17/2014 5:36 AM, Styma, Robert E (Robert) wrote:
> Researching showed that there are a number of little selinux flags
> to set to get samba to work. I went into /etc/selinux/config and
> turned off selinux to test and rebooted. The problems went away.
> Now I just have to figure out what to
OS mailing list
> Subject: [CentOS] Strange Samba Issue
>
> Ok so I built the microserver as a centos box and now I have a strange
> one
>
> I built a Centos 6.5 box with a 3.6 raid ext4 data drive on it, shared
> with samba.
>
> Now when I browse these folders on the conso
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:26 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 2/11/2014 10:09 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> What server software have you tried? I'm using serviio on a mac but
>> would expect the linux version to be equivalent, with an assortment of
>> players (ps3, sony blu-ray player, vlc on an ipa
On 2/11/2014 10:09 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> What server software have you tried? I'm using serviio on a mac but
> would expect the linux version to be equivalent, with an assortment of
> players (ps3, sony blu-ray player, vlc on an ipad, etc.). The trick
> with video is to be sure it is encoded
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:04 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 2/10/2014 12:57 PM, Jeff Allison wrote:
>> The other media player is android so there's probably no nfs client
>> for that an dthe wife and kids are on windows so a dlna server we'll
>> have to find.
>
> my experiences with trying to use D
On 2/10/2014 12:57 PM, Jeff Allison wrote:
> The other media player is android so there's probably no nfs client
> for that an dthe wife and kids are on windows so a dlna server we'll
> have to find.
my experiences with trying to use DLNA for video have been awful. its OK
for audio, as long as th
Dunno I'll need to check. I doubt it though.
nfs seems pretty good on the mac and xbmc jobbie.
The other media player is android so there's probably no nfs client
for that an dthe wife and kids are on windows so a dlna server we'll
have to find.
On 11 February 2014 02:33, John Doe wrote:
> From
From: Jeff Allison
> Now when I browse these folders on the console I can see the files. when I
> sftp on the command line from another box I can see these files.
> But when I browse via samba or using a gui sftp client quite a lot of these
> files are missing...
Filenames encoding maybe...?
JD
Seems to work fine in nfs, a bit slower though.
On 10 February 2014 15:19, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 15:12 +1100, Jeff Allison wrote:
>
> > Perhaps it's time to generate nfs shares and see how that goes.
>
> I'd be interested in your progress implementing NFS (version 4?)
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 15:12 +1100, Jeff Allison wrote:
> Perhaps it's time to generate nfs shares and see how that goes.
I'd be interested in your progress implementing NFS (version 4?) and how
it compares to Samba.
--
Paul.
England,
EU.
Our systems are exclusively Linux. No Micro$oft Win
Perhaps it's time to generate nfs shares and see how that goes.
On 10 February 2014 15:08, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 14:56 +1100, Jeff Allison wrote:
>
> > samba / gui sftp client.
> >
> > Commanline sftp gives the right response.
>
> Perhaps a bug or a configuration limi
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 14:56 +1100, Jeff Allison wrote:
> samba / gui sftp client.
>
> Commanline sftp gives the right response.
Perhaps a bug or a configuration limitation.
I use filezilla with SFTP. Never had a problem.
When I left Windoze 4 or 5 years ago, I took essential data to Centos
an
samba / gui sftp client.
Commanline sftp gives the right response.
On 10 February 2014 14:52, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 14:37 +1100, Jeff Allison wrote:
>
> > Seems to be still alphabetical
>
> Regret I don't know. Hopefully the others may have a solution.
>
> What softw
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 14:37 +1100, Jeff Allison wrote:
> Seems to be still alphabetical
Regret I don't know. Hopefully the others may have a solution.
What software gives the truncated results ?
--
Paul.
England,
EU.
Our systems are exclusively Linux. No Micro$oft Windoze here.
_
Seems to be still alphabetical
On 10 February 2014 14:29, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 14:17 +1100, Jeff Allison wrote:
>
> > The strangest is that it's not all the files I can see files in some
> > folders but to others. If I sort alphabetically I get to about b.
>
> On a
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 14:17 +1100, Jeff Allison wrote:
> The strangest is that it's not all the files I can see files in some
> folders but to others. If I sort alphabetically I get to about b.
On a filter on last date used/accessed ?
--
Paul.
England,
EU.
Our systems are exclusively Linu
Possibly, but I've moved a file from inside a folder to the top level and
it still doesn't show.
It's a 700G folder though.
On 10 February 2014 14:25, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 14:17 +1100, Jeff Allison wrote:
>
> > The strangest is that it's not all the files I can see
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 14:17 +1100, Jeff Allison wrote:
> The strangest is that it's not all the files I can see files in some
> folders but to others. If I sort alphabetically I get to about b.
Could there be a predetermined limit on the quantity of displayed
entries or a buffer-full problem ?
The strangest is that it's not all the files I can see files in some
folders but to others. If I sort alphabetically I get to about b.
On 10 February 2014 14:11, Jeff Allison wrote:
> I've set myself as the owner and the permissions to 777
>
>
> On 10 February 2014 14:08, Always Learning wrote:
I've set myself as the owner and the permissions to 777
On 10 February 2014 14:08, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 13:46 +1100, Jeff Allison wrote:
> > Ok so I built the microserver as a centos box and now I have a strange
> one
> >
> > I built a Centos 6.5 box with a 3.6 raid
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 13:46 +1100, Jeff Allison wrote:
> Ok so I built the microserver as a centos box and now I have a strange one
>
> I built a Centos 6.5 box with a 3.6 raid ext4 data drive on it, shared
> with samba.
>
> Now when I browse these folders on the console I can see the files. wh
Ok so I built the microserver as a centos box and now I have a strange one
I built a Centos 6.5 box with a 3.6 raid ext4 data drive on it, shared
with samba.
Now when I browse these folders on the console I can see the files. when I
sftp on the command line from another box I can see these files
23 matches
Mail list logo