On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 09/14/2011 01:59 PM, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
> > Based on the bug report for the snapshot-create issue, it seems it's in
> > libvirt 0.9.0 and that it's something that may be solved completely in
> > Fedora 16. Is there a good way to find
On 09/14/2011 01:59 PM, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
> Based on the bug report for the snapshot-create issue, it seems it's in
> libvirt 0.9.0 and that it's something that may be solved completely in
> Fedora 16. Is there a good way to find if a specific patch/fix has been
> applied upstream by Red Hat?
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 09/14/2011 01:30 AM, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
> > What is the preferred method for submitting patches from upstream
> > projects ? I have two patches for libvirt-0.8.1.el6_0.6. One adds ESX
> > 4.1 support to things like virt-v2v
> > (htt
On 09/14/2011 01:30 AM, Trey Dockendorf wrote:
> What is the preferred method for submitting patches from upstream
> projects ? I have two patches for libvirt-0.8.1.el6_0.6. One adds ESX
> 4.1 support to things like virt-v2v
> (http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-July/msg00480.html) a
What is the preferred method for submitting patches from upstream projects ?
I have two patches for libvirt-0.8.1.el6_0.6. One adds ESX 4.1 support to
things like virt-v2v (
http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-July/msg00480.html) and the
second fixes the broken "virsh snapshot-create"
5 matches
Mail list logo