> did anyone give insight into the OP question, or is this just email
> bashing class 099 ?
It was answered, thanks.
The offending disclaimer message is gone now. How does this Sig file
look gentlemen?
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
be
on 1-22-2009 2:43 PM Michael St. Laurent spake the following:
>>> What is the status of i7 architecture support for CentOS-5? Do the
>>> latest updates support it?
>
>> according to the upstream notes wait for 5.3
>
> Is there a projected release date for CentOS-5.3?
>
Sometime in the future.
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Michael St. Laurent
wrote:
> What is the status of i7 architecture support for CentOS-5? Do the
> latest updates support it?
>
We have one box i7 with CentOS 5.2 here. It works very well ;-)
> uname -a
Linux xxx 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 #1 SMP Tue Dec 16 11:57:43 EST
did anyone give insight into the OP question, or is this just email bashing
class 099 ?
:-o
- rh
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
St. Laurent
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 5:18 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] Support for i7 architecture?
What is the status of i7 architecture support for CentOS-5? Do the
latest updates support it?
--
This e-mail may contain technical information which is controlled by the
On Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:10:19 +0100
Rainer Duffner wrote:
> Sheesh!
>
>
>
>
> WTF?
> Do you want him to have his email-account suspended?
> Please, folks, be a little more insightful and not so quick with the
> email-button.
As I see it, that big write-up either means what it says or it does
> > I have helped by sending money. I don't know if that counts or not
> > though.
> >
> Money is very nice and it does count and it does help. Hopefully, your
> companies money and not your own... No need to lurk.
Yes, it's money from the fools who insist on the stupid disclaimer.
Justice of a
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Michael St. Laurent
wrote:
>> > Is there a projected release date for CentOS-5.3?
>> >
>> hedidnotask...this
>>
>> search the forums..when it's done..unless you would like to help..:)
>
> I have helped by sending money. I don't know if that counts
Miguel Medalha wrote:
> Well, you must concede that it is *somewhat* ridiculous to read a
> one-line innocent email containing a twelve-line dense disclaimer...
Yes, but it is not his fault.
Now let us all laugh at his employer and be finished with it.
Other people in here cannot trim their rep
Michael St. Laurent wrote:
> > > Is there a projected release date for CentOS-5.3?
> > >
> > >
> > hedidnotask...this
> >
> > search the forums..when it's done..unless you would like to help..:)
>
> I have helped by sending money. I don't know if that counts or not
> though.
Sur
Well, you must concede that it is *somewhat* ridiculous to read a
one-line innocent email containing a twelve-line dense disclaimer...
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> > Is there a projected release date for CentOS-5.3?
> >
> >
> hedidnotask...this
>
> search the forums..when it's done..unless you would like to help..:)
I have helped by sending money. I don't know if that counts or not
though.
--
This e-mail may contain technical information
Am 22.01.2009 um 23:59 schrieb Frank Cox:
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:46:00 -0800
> Michael St. Laurent wrote:
>
>> It's not a Sig file unfortunately. The Exchange mail server used
>> here
>> stamps it on every outgoing email. I've asked the Exchange admin
>> about
>> putting in an exception f
Am 22.01.2009 um 23:52 schrieb Lanny Marcus:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Michael St. Laurent
> wrote:
>>> Mike: As Tru pointed out, you should trim your Sig file
>>> considerably,
>>> or eliminate it. I really doubt that DoD cares if you get help or
>>> information from this mailing lis
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:46:00 -0800
Michael St. Laurent wrote:
> It's not a Sig file unfortunately. The Exchange mail server used here
> stamps it on every outgoing email. I've asked the Exchange admin about
> putting in an exception for my mail account.
I forwarded your first email to not...@ha
> > Is there a projected release date for CentOS-5.3?
> >
> >
> hedidnotask...this
>
> search the forums..when it's done..unless you would like to help..:)
Sorry folks. I'll go back to lurking now.
--
This e-mail may contain technical information which is controlled by the Unite
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Michael St. Laurent
wrote:
>> Mike: As Tru pointed out, you should trim your Sig file considerably,
>> or eliminate it. I really doubt that DoD cares if you get help or
>> information from this mailing list. We have people with .gov email
>> addresses participating
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Michael St. Laurent
wrote:
>> > What is the status of i7 architecture support for CentOS-5? Do the
>> > latest updates support it?
>
>> according to the upstream notes wait for 5.3
>
> Is there a projected release date for CentOS-5.3?
This will probably take the
>
>
> Is there a projected release date for CentOS-5.3?
>
>
hedidnotask...this
search the forums..when it's done..unless you would like to help..:)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/cen
> Mike: As Tru pointed out, you should trim your Sig file considerably,
> or eliminate it. I really doubt that DoD cares if you get help or
> information from this mailing list. We have people with .gov email
> addresses participating (NASA, etc.) and none of them have Sig files
> like that. Welcom
> > What is the status of i7 architecture support for CentOS-5? Do the
> > latest updates support it?
> according to the upstream notes wait for 5.3
Is there a projected release date for CentOS-5.3?
--
This e-mail may contain technical information which is controlled by the United
States Gover
"Michael St. Laurent" wrote:
>>
I hate that stupid thing but the suits have insisted on it. My
apologies for any implied insult.
<<
Just so you know, such disclaimers are *all* bluster and have no legal
force whatsoever (with one exception: privileged attorney-client
communications). If someon
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Michael St. Laurent
wrote:
> What is the status of i7 architecture support for CentOS-5? Do the
> latest updates support it?
Mike: As Tru pointed out, you should trim your Sig file considerably,
or eliminate it. I really doubt that DoD cares if you get help or
in
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 02:18:05PM -0800, Michael St. Laurent wrote:
> > What is the status of i7 architecture support for CentOS-5? Do the
> > latest updates support it?
> according to the upstream notes wait for 5.3
>
> oh, I should not reply, nor read your mail according to your footer ;)
>
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 02:18:05PM -0800, Michael St. Laurent wrote:
> What is the status of i7 architecture support for CentOS-5? Do the
> latest updates support it?
according to the upstream notes wait for 5.3
oh, I should not reply, nor read your mail according to your footer ;)
(not a US Lega
What is the status of i7 architecture support for CentOS-5? Do the
latest updates support it?
--
This e-mail may contain technical information which is controlled by the United
States Government, Department of State, International Traffic & Arms
Regulations (ITAR) (22 CFR 120-130) which require
26 matches
Mail list logo
