On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Vandaman wrote:
You are the guy who is having a bit of a moan on the Fedora
list about KDE. How many patches have you contributed to
Fedora or to CentOS? This is open source after all, you have
access to the source.
Not every user is a contributor for development, documenta
Vandaman wrote:
Milton Calnek wrote:
Sorry, I missed the question. I'm severely confused
and I don't know what I'm talking about.
My friend, stop misquoting me. See
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-November/067393.html
Are you leading by example here?
--
Les Mikesell
[EM
Milton Calnek wrote:
> Sorry, I missed the question. I'm severely confused
> and I don't know what I'm talking about.
My friend, stop misquoting me. See
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-November/067393.html
Regards,
Vandaman.
___
CentO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vandaman wrote:
>> I'm listening if you have any other comments or advice
>> on my situation.
>>
Sorry, I missed the question.
- --
Milton Calnek BSc, A/Slt(Ret.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
306-717-8737
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5
Linuxguy123 wrote:
> I've been a RH/Fedora guy since the RH8 days. When
> Fedora came along, I
> moved to it, but its been a bit painful beta testing
> software all the
> time. I ran Ubuntu for a while, but I found their package
> management
> to be difficult... I do a lot of technical work,
>
Phil Schaffner wrote:
IMHO should be a separate repo, or at least a naming scheme that would
let people still use the "traditional" centos-plus kernels
Sure, thats a bridge to cross when we have someone offering to maintain
this. And I was already thinking along those lines..
- KB
_
Hi,
for what it's worth, I'm running CentOS 5 with the planet-core,
planet-ccrma and novell-mono repos which exist for centos/rhel5 these
days. The planet-core repo contains the 2.6.24.7 with realtime patches
and other goodness for audio/video stuffs. I've been using this setup
for about 6 months
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Phil Schaffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 22:33 +, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> Linuxguy123 wrote:
>> > b) One of the things I really need are up to date (bleeding edge)
>> > kernels. For example, F8 has 2.6.26 kernels, whereas CentOS appear
On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 22:33 +, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Linuxguy123 wrote:
> > b) One of the things I really need are up to date (bleeding edge)
> > kernels. For example, F8 has 2.6.26 kernels, whereas CentOS appears to
> > be running 2.6.18 kernels. I do know how to build my own kernels, but
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Linuxguy123 wrote:
> b) One of the things I really need are up to date (bleeding edge)
> kernels. For example, F8 has 2.6.26 kernels, whereas CentOS appears to
> be running 2.6.18 kernels. I do know how
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Linuxguy123 wrote:
b) One of the things I really need are up to date (bleeding edge)
kernels. For example, F8 has 2.6.26 kernels, whereas CentOS appears to
be running 2.6.18 kernels. I do know how to build my own kernels, but
that is a pain.
D
Linuxguy123 wrote:
b) One of the things I really need are up to date (bleeding edge)
kernels. For example, F8 has 2.6.26 kernels, whereas CentOS appears to
be running 2.6.18 kernels. I do know how to build my own kernels, but
that is a pain.
Does someone keep a separate repository that has mor
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Linuxguy123 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thus I am shopping for a new OS to solve this problem and the problem of
> continually being a beta tester if one is an up to date Fedora user.
> With Fedora it seems that one just gets a new installation working
> nicely
I've been a RH/Fedora guy since the RH8 days. When Fedora came along, I
moved to it, but its been a bit painful beta testing software all the
time. I ran Ubuntu for a while, but I found their package management
to be difficult... I do a lot of technical work, development and loading
and building
14 matches
Mail list logo
