Stephen Harris wrote:
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 09:48:28PM +0200, Thomas Johansson wrote:
Is there someone that can explain why I get incorrect results on centos
4.6 and 4.7 but not on centos 5.2??
test000:/% date -d 2008-10-25 +1 days +%Y-%m-%d
2008-10-26
test000:/% date -d 2008-10-26 +1 days
Is there someone that can explain why I get incorrect results on centos
4.6 and 4.7 but not on centos 5.2??
The date 2008-10-26 +1 days should results in 2008-10-27
On centos 4.6
--
test000:/% date -d 2008-10-25 +1 days +%Y-%m-%d
2008-10-26
test000:/% date -d 2008-10-26 +1 days
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 09:48:28PM +0200, Thomas Johansson wrote:
Is there someone that can explain why I get incorrect results on centos
4.6 and 4.7 but not on centos 5.2??
test000:/% date -d 2008-10-25 +1 days +%Y-%m-%d
2008-10-26
test000:/% date -d 2008-10-26 +1 days +%Y-%m-%d
On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 21:48 +0200, Thomas Johansson wrote:
snip
On centos 4.6
--
test000:/% date -d 2008-10-25 +1 days +%Y-%m-%d
2008-10-26
test000:/% date -d 2008-10-26 +1 days +%Y-%m-%d
2008-10-26
test000:/% uname -a
Linux test000... 2.6.9-67.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri Nov 16
On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 16:26 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote:
snip
On centos 4.7
--
test001:/% date -d 2008-10-25 +1 days +%Y-%m-%d
2008-10-26
test001:/% date -d 2008-10-26 +1 days +%Y-%m-%d
2008-10-26
I just typed the above in on the console on my 4.7 node. WFM.
5 matches
Mail list logo