Stephen Harris wrote:
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 09:48:28PM +0200, Thomas Johansson wrote:
Is there someone that can explain why I get incorrect results on centos
4.6 and 4.7 but not on centos 5.2??
test000:/% date -d "2008-10-25 +1 days" "+%Y-%m-%d"
2008-10-26
test000:/% date -d "2008-10-26 +1
On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 16:26 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote:
>
> >
> > On centos 4.7
> > --
> > test001:/% date -d "2008-10-25 +1 days" "+%Y-%m-%d"
> > 2008-10-26
> > test001:/% date -d "2008-10-26 +1 days" "+%Y-%m-%d"
> > 2008-10-26
>
> I just typed the above in on the console on m
On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 21:48 +0200, Thomas Johansson wrote:
>
> On centos 4.6
> --
> test000:/% date -d "2008-10-25 +1 days" "+%Y-%m-%d"
> 2008-10-26
> test000:/% date -d "2008-10-26 +1 days" "+%Y-%m-%d"
> 2008-10-26
> test000:/% uname -a
> Linux test000... 2.6.9-67.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri N
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 09:48:28PM +0200, Thomas Johansson wrote:
> Is there someone that can explain why I get incorrect results on centos
> 4.6 and 4.7 but not on centos 5.2??
> test000:/% date -d "2008-10-25 +1 days" "+%Y-%m-%d"
> 2008-10-26
> test000:/% date -d "2008-10-26 +1 days" "+%Y-%m-%d
Is there someone that can explain why I get incorrect results on centos
4.6 and 4.7 but not on centos 5.2??
The date "2008-10-26 +1 days" should results in 2008-10-27
On centos 4.6
--
test000:/% date -d "2008-10-25 +1 days" "+%Y-%m-%d"
2008-10-26
test000:/% date -d "2008-10-26 +1 da
5 matches
Mail list logo