On Mar 26, 2008, at 3:22 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
I'm thinking that this sort of setup can't be too uncommon in "big"
small
business networks. An office with 600 networked computers won't be
sucking on
one measly DSL line, but they might be using ten at a total cost
that's less
than a high-ca
On Mar 26, 2008, at 3:08 PM, Timothy Selivanow wrote:
The only way to "shotgun" (an ISP had to specifically support modem
shotgunning in the olden days, BTW), i.e. do aggregate routing, is if
you had a separate routed sub-net and ran BGP on the router
connected to
the two lines (The rest of t
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:08:52 -0600
Frank Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:48:33 -0400
> Peter Arremann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Getting better answers when posting on two lists? ;)
>
> Yup. More answers from more people. Gotta be good!
> >
> > Anyway - I have a s
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:00:11 -0700
Dennis McLeod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's what I would get:
>
> http://www.netgear.com/Products/VPNandSSL/WiredVPNFirewallRouters/FVS336G.as
> px
That, and the xincom router mentioned above by Peter, look like exactly what I
want.
Thanks!
--
MELVIL
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:48:33 -0400
Peter Arremann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Getting better answers when posting on two lists? ;)
Yup. More answers from more people. Gotta be good!
>
> Anyway - I have a similar setup - Fios and cable modem. I use a Xincom
> router.
Cool. I was just snoopi
Peter Arremann wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 March 2008, Frank Cox wrote:
> > I do some occasional tech work for a cable TV/Internet service provider.
> > They have now offered me free services, including cable Internet. I
> > currently have a DSL service through the telephone company and, for several
Behalf
Of Frank Cox
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 12:27 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] Two Internet connections...
I do some occasional tech work for a cable TV/Internet service provider.
They have now offered me free services, including cable Internet. I
currently have a DSL service t
On Wednesday 26 March 2008, Frank Cox wrote:
> I do some occasional tech work for a cable TV/Internet service provider.
> They have now offered me free services, including cable Internet. I
> currently have a DSL service through the telephone company and, for several
> reasons including the fact
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 16:35 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> If you had 2 Internet firewalls each with their own default route, each
> doing NAT. On each of these firewalls you had a squid process running
> proxying requests and chaining requests from one squid to the other
> depending either on,
Frank Cox wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:08:58 -0700
> Timothy Selivanow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The only way that you would be able to use them is a semi-load-balancing
> > formation. What I mean by "semi" is that all traffic that exits one
> > interface will always return to that one.
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 13:08:58 -0700
Timothy Selivanow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only way that you would be able to use them is a semi-load-balancing
> formation. What I mean by "semi" is that all traffic that exits one
> interface will always return to that one. Also, an entire transaction
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 13:08 -0700, Timothy Selivanow wrote:
> Also, an entire transaction will go over only one of the lines,
> meaning you will only get the throughput of one line at a time.
I forgot to mention that independent applications (therefor many
independent connections) won't use just o
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 13:27 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> I do some occasional tech work for a cable TV/Internet service provider. They
> have now offered me free services, including cable Internet. I currently
> have a
> DSL service through the telephone company and, for several reasons including
I do some occasional tech work for a cable TV/Internet service provider. They
have now offered me free services, including cable Internet. I currently have a
DSL service through the telephone company and, for several reasons including the
fact that it is really unlimited service with no cap and i
In the event that the internet connection is DOWN (box is fine just the
cable modem is down)
how do I set things up so I can take advantage of the second internet
connection?
there are more ideal [and complex] ways of setting up the connections
so you only use one firewall - maybe using the s
I have two internet connections. One is a partial T1 of data (and rest
voice) the
other is business cable. Both connections come into my office into (2)
centos 5
boxs with 2 ethernet cards in each box. The second ethernet card is
192.168.1.59 and 192.168.1.1
respectively.
I have all my DHCP se
16 matches
Mail list logo
