Re: [CentOS] Update RPM GPG key for EL9

On 6/1/22 23:40, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > On 02/06/2022 00:22, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> On 6/1/22 13:43, Fabian Arrotin wrote: >>> On 01/06/2022 19:51, Orion Poplawski wrote: Looks like the GPG key we use to sign our RPMs is not longer good with EL9: # rpm --import RPM-GPG-KEY-nwra

Re: [CentOS] Update RPM GPG key for EL9

On 02/06/2022 00:22, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 6/1/22 13:43, Fabian Arrotin wrote: On 01/06/2022 19:51, Orion Poplawski wrote: Looks like the GPG key we use to sign our RPMs is not longer good with EL9: # rpm --import RPM-GPG-KEY-nwra error: RPM-GPG-KEY-nwra: key 1 import failed gpg key

Re: [CentOS] Update RPM GPG key for EL9

On 6/1/22 13:43, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > On 01/06/2022 19:51, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> Looks like the GPG key we use to sign our RPMs is not longer good with EL9: >> >> # rpm --import RPM-GPG-KEY-nwra >> error: RPM-GPG-KEY-nwra: key 1 import failed >> >> gpg key info: >> >> sec 

Re: [CentOS] Update RPM GPG key for EL9

On 01/06/2022 19:51, Orion Poplawski wrote: Looks like the GPG key we use to sign our RPMs is not longer good with EL9: # rpm --import RPM-GPG-KEY-nwra error: RPM-GPG-KEY-nwra: key 1 import failed gpg key info: sec rsa2048/35DDB0B86218AC2F created: 2017-08-16 expires: never

[CentOS] Update RPM GPG key for EL9

Looks like the GPG key we use to sign our RPMs is not longer good with EL9: # rpm --import RPM-GPG-KEY-nwra error: RPM-GPG-KEY-nwra: key 1 import failed gpg key info: sec rsa2048/35DDB0B86218AC2F created: 2017-08-16 expires: never usage: SC trust: ultimate validity:

Re: [CentOS] CentOS update

Il 2021-12-03 15:46 Johnny Hughes ha scritto: sssd-client-1.16.5-10.el7_9.11.i686.rpm exists and is here: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7.9.2009/updates/x86_64/Packages/ Not sure why you are not seeing it in your update. It is an Azure CentOS instance, which is pre-configured for using

Re: [CentOS] CentOS update

On 12/3/21 02:52, Gionatan Danti wrote: Dear list, I have an issue updating a CentOS 7.9 machine. A simple "yum update" exists with this error: # yum update --> Running transaction check ---> Package kernel.x86_64 0:3.10.0-1160.36.2.el7 will be erased --> Finished Dependency Resolution ERROR:

[CentOS] CentOS update

Dear list, I have an issue updating a CentOS 7.9 machine. A simple "yum update" exists with this error: # yum update --> Running transaction check ---> Package kernel.x86_64 0:3.10.0-1160.36.2.el7 will be erased --> Finished Dependency Resolution ERROR: update failed. Check the log file for

[CentOS] Update - Resizing a QEMU guest display

Strahil Nikolov and I took this conversation off-line for a few days. The thread of our discussion is below. Net result: No solution is yet found. Strahil had some very good ideas, but they did not pan out in this case. For archiving - and in hope that someone may have some other ideas! - I

Re: [CentOS] Update path question in connection with CentOS Stream?

Am 10.12.20 um 16:51 schrieb Pete Biggs: when someone has installed a CentOS 7.1 in the past, and did 'yum update' regularily, his/she got a CentOS 7.8 now without any reinstallation procedure or other complications; when the same wanted to update to CentOS 8 he/she had to do a new install;

Re: [CentOS] Update path question in connection with CentOS Stream?

> when someone has installed a CentOS 7.1 in the past, > > and did 'yum update' regularily, his/she got a CentOS 7.8 now without > any reinstallation procedure or other complications; > > when the same wanted to update to CentOS 8 he/she had to do a new install; > > what happens to CentOS

[CentOS] Update path question in connection with CentOS Stream?

Hello, when someone has installed a CentOS 7.1 in the past, and did 'yum update' regularily, his/she got a CentOS 7.8 now without any reinstallation procedure or other complications; when the same wanted to update to CentOS 8 he/she had to do a new install; what happens to CentOS Stream?

Re: [CentOS] Update CentOS 6 one last time?

We resolved the issue by modifying the CentOS-Base.repo by adding the appropriate URL's to the various sections, for example: baseurl=http://vault.centos.org/6.10/os/$basearch/ Thank you, Paul On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 1:25 PM Paul Storck wrote: > Thank you for the response. I added (copied,

Re: [CentOS] Update CentOS 6 one last time?

On 12/8/20 3:25 PM, Paul Storck via CentOS wrote: > Thank you for the response. I added (copied, edited, pasted from the C6.9 > section) the following to the /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Vault.repo file but > I still get the same error message. > I'm thinking the paths are incorrect in my file because

Re: [CentOS] Update CentOS 6 one last time?

> Date: Tuesday, December 08, 2020 13:25:42 -0800 > From: Paul Storck via CentOS > >> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 8:45 AM Subscriber >> wrote: >> >> > - On Dec 8, 2020, at 6:31 PM, Paul Storck wrote: >> >> > Hello, is it possible to install the final updates for CentOS 6? >> > I ran a yum

Re: [CentOS] Update CentOS 6 one last time?

Thank you for the response. I added (copied, edited, pasted from the C6.9 section) the following to the /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Vault.repo file but I still get the same error message. I'm thinking the paths are incorrect in my file because when I try to go to directly to the URL

Re: [CentOS] Update CentOS 6 one last time?

On 12/8/20 10:31 AM, Paul Storck via CentOS wrote: > Hello, is it possible to install the final updates for CentOS 6? > I ran a yum update and I received this message "Error: Cannot find a valid > baseurl for repo: base" > I assume it's due to the EOL of CentOS 6? > Yes, and archived version of

Re: [CentOS] Update CentOS 6 one last time?

- On Dec 8, 2020, at 6:31 PM, Paul Storck via CentOS centos@centos.org wrote: > Hello, is it possible to install the final updates for CentOS 6? > I ran a yum update and I received this message "Error: Cannot find a valid > baseurl for repo: base" > I assume it's due to the EOL of CentOS 6?

[CentOS] Update CentOS 6 one last time?

Hello, is it possible to install the final updates for CentOS 6? I ran a yum update and I received this message "Error: Cannot find a valid baseurl for repo: base" I assume it's due to the EOL of CentOS 6? Thank you, Paul ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] Update from 7 to 8

El 23/11/20 a las 16:44, Jerry Geis escribió: I stumbled on this today. https://www.hostwinds.com/guide/upgrading-from-centos-7-to-8/ I understand the best is always a re-install But are these steps the next best thing to update from 7 to 8 ? Thanks, Jerry

Re: [CentOS] Update from 7 to 8

On Mon, 2020-11-23 at 10:44 -0500, Jerry Geis wrote: > I stumbled on this today. > https://www.hostwinds.com/guide/upgrading-from-centos-7-to-8/ > > I understand the best is always a re-install But are these steps > the > next best thing to update from 7 to 8 ? > Jerry, There is a formally

[CentOS] Update from 7 to 8

I stumbled on this today. https://www.hostwinds.com/guide/upgrading-from-centos-7-to-8/ I understand the best is always a re-install But are these steps the next best thing to update from 7 to 8 ? Thanks, Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] update CentOS 7 at Nov 05 2019

the logs I have found where mentioned in the before message. I found the surprising time idendity between yum update and the stop of logging. All other logfiles seem OK. e.g. wtmp. rsyslog.conf is OK and same as in comparable servers. The time gap (some 2 weeks) between loss of log content and

Re: [CentOS] update CentOS 7 at Nov 05 2019

On Dec 1, 2019, at 6:05 PM, Helmut Drodofsky wrote: > any help to have kernel logging again? Have you done anything to resolve it? Restart rsyslog? Check the journal? -- Jonathan Billings ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

[CentOS] update CentOS 7 at Nov 05 2019

yum update was run 23.10.19 and then 05.11.19 to the beginning of the update 5.11.2019 kernel logging to /var/log/messages was ok. During the update at 5.11.2019 logging to /var/log/messages finished. I persume, this bug began during processing updates. yum-log shows: ... Nov 05

Re: [CentOS] Update to Centos 7.7 / Arch ppc64le / Problem with nvidia driver

Hello Fabian, On 26.09.19 09:46, Fabian Arrotin wrote: On 25/09/2019 10:30, Ralf Aumüller wrote: ... today I updated a CentOS 7.6 ppc64le machine to CentOS 7.7. After reboot to the new kernel (4.18.0-80.7.2.el7.ppc64le) dkms could not build the nvidia-module. ...>> Any comments? thanks for

Re: [CentOS] Update to Centos 7.7 / Arch ppc64le / Problem with nvidia driver

On 25/09/2019 10:30, Ralf Aumüller wrote: > Hello, > > today I updated a CentOS 7.6 ppc64le machine to CentOS 7.7. After reboot > to the new kernel (4.18.0-80.7.2.el7.ppc64le) dkms could not build the > nvidia-module. > > Error-message from dkms: > > Compiler version check failed: > > The

Re: [CentOS] Update to Centos 7.7 / Arch ppc64le / Problem with nvidia driver

driver installer downloaded from the nvidia site. Then a normal reboot and it worked. cheers mathy From: CentOS on behalf of Ralf Aumüller Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2019 10:30 To: centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] Update to Centos 7.7 / Arch

[CentOS] Update to Centos 7.7 / Arch ppc64le / Problem with nvidia driver

Hello, today I updated a CentOS 7.6 ppc64le machine to CentOS 7.7. After reboot to the new kernel (4.18.0-80.7.2.el7.ppc64le) dkms could not build the nvidia-module. Error-message from dkms: Compiler version check failed: The major and minor number of the compiler used to compile the

Re: [CentOS] update failure

On 27/4/19 3:02 pm, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: ... The upgrade succeeded after manually removing the older dupes. Thanks for your suggestions. Emmett ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] update failure

On 4/22/19 10:45 AM, Ulf Volmer wrote: On 22.04.19 18:12, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: On 4/21/19 10:15 AM, Ulf Volmer wrote: package-cleanup --dupes will list the duplicate packages package-cleanup --cleandupes will remove the dupes. If I remember correctly, you have to add

Re: [CentOS] update failure

On 22.04.19 18:12, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: > On 4/21/19 10:15 AM, Ulf Volmer wrote: >> package-cleanup --dupes >> >> will list the duplicate packages >> >> package-cleanup --cleandupes >> >> will remove the dupes. If I remember correctly, you have to add >> --removenewestdupes to the

Re: [CentOS] update failure

On 4/21/19 10:15 AM, Ulf Volmer wrote: On 21.04.19 16:14, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: When I attempted to update a remote server via SSH last night the UPS on my local workstations failed, causing the SSH session to get dropped in the middle of the upgrade process.  This morning I am not

Re: [CentOS] update failure

On 21.04.19 16:14, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: > When I attempted to update a remote server via SSH last night the UPS on > my local workstations failed, causing the SSH session to get dropped in > the middle of the upgrade process.  This morning I am not able to > complete the update.  When

[CentOS] update failure

When I attempted to update a remote server via SSH last night the UPS on my local workstations failed, causing the SSH session to get dropped in the middle of the upgrade process. This morning I am not able to complete the update. When it failed when I tried to run it again thins morning I

Re: [CentOS] Update failure: Mate requires libgtop-2.0.so.10

On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 08:59:22AM -0500, Jason Edgecombe wrote: > In addition, there is a bugzilla report for this: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644519 I think I'm going to just lie low for a while until the upgrade to 7.6 stabliizes a bit. I have several machines, mostly

Re: [CentOS] Update failure: Mate requires libgtop-2.0.so.10

In addition, there is a bugzilla report for this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644519 --- Jason Edgecombe | Linux Administrator UNC Charlotte | The William States Lee College of Engineering 9201 University City

Re: [CentOS] Update failure: Mate requires libgtop-2.0.so.10

> Date: Monday, December 03, 2018 20:41:20 -0600 > From: Frank Cox > > I just tried updating this laptop to the shiny new Centos version > and it appears that Mate doesn't like the new version of libgtop, > as you can see here: > > Error: Package: marco-1.16.1-3.el7.x86_64 (@epel) >

[CentOS] Update failure: Mate requires libgtop-2.0.so.10

I just tried updating this laptop to the shiny new Centos version and it appears that Mate doesn't like the new version of libgtop, as you can see here: Error: Package: marco-1.16.1-3.el7.x86_64 (@epel) Requires: libgtop-2.0.so.10()(64bit) Removing:

Re: [CentOS] Update to libstdc+++ causes problems.

On 11/13/18 11:50 AM, Chris Johnson wrote: I believe most of the images were originally built for Ubuntu. Sounds like that you are trying to run some binaries that were built for Ubuntu, and the Ubuntu version they used has a higher ABI version than those in CentOS 7. If these were

Re: [CentOS] Update to libstdc+++ causes problems.

On 11/13/2018 12:50 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 12:10:22PM -0500, Chris Johnson wrote: In a very recent update to CentOS 7 libstdc++ has been altered in a way that has removed CXXABI_1.3.8 and GLIBCXX_3.4.20.  I've noticed that this has broken a number of executables

Re: [CentOS] Update to libstdc+++ causes problems.

On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 12:10:22PM -0500, Chris Johnson wrote: > In a very recent update to CentOS 7 libstdc++ has been altered in a way that > has removed CXXABI_1.3.8 and GLIBCXX_3.4.20.  I've noticed that this has > broken a number of executables linked on other systems that used to run on >

[CentOS] Update to libstdc+++ causes problems.

Hi. New to this list.  If this has been answered/resolved already, please point me to the solution. In a very recent update to CentOS 7 libstdc++ has been altered in a way that has removed CXXABI_1.3.8 and GLIBCXX_3.4.20.  I've noticed that this has broken a number of executables linked on

[CentOS-announce] centos-release-7-5.1804.5.el7.centos update

We have released an update to the centos-release that changes some of the architectures to use mirrorlist.centos.org (which also uses external mirrors) .. instead of having all alternative arches use only mirror.centos.org.  This should male updates happen faster for these arches as it spreads the

Re: [CentOS] Update announcement request - correction...

> -Original Message- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Johnny Hughes > Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2018 9:39 AM > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Update announcement request - correction... > > >> plus-3.10.0-862.2.

Re: [CentOS] Update announcement request - correction...

On 05/25/2018 11:32 AM, Albert McCann wrote: >> Related to that, a new kernel was released to the Centosplus repo, kernel- >> plus-3.10.0-862.2.3.el7.centos.plus, but perf and python-perf were not >> updated for the new kernel. Is this an oversight? perf doesn't complain >> about mismatched

Re: [CentOS] Update announcement request - correction...

On 05/25/2018 03:54 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 9:32 AM, Albert McCann > wrote: >>> Related to that, a new kernel was released to the Centosplus repo, kernel- >>> plus-3.10.0-862.2.3.el7.centos.plus, but perf and python-perf were not >>> updated for

Re: [CentOS] Update announcement request - correction...

On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 9:32 AM, Albert McCann wrote: >> Related to that, a new kernel was released to the Centosplus repo, kernel- >> plus-3.10.0-862.2.3.el7.centos.plus, but perf and python-perf were not >> updated for the new kernel. Is this an oversight? perf

Re: [CentOS] Update announcement request - correction...

> Related to that, a new kernel was released to the Centosplus repo, kernel- > plus-3.10.0-862.2.3.el7.centos.plus, but perf and python-perf were not > updated for the new kernel. Is this an oversight? perf doesn't complain > about mismatched versions though.

[CentOS] Update announcement request

Hi, Can the updated files added to the Centosplus repo be sent to the announcement list please? I can't find them announced in any of the other lists. Related to that, a new kernel was released to the Centosplus repo, kernel-plus-3.10.0-862.2.3.el7.centos.plus, but perf and python-perf were

Re: [CentOS] Update to 3.10.0-693.17.1 breaks ath5k

On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 10:57 PM, Stephen Davies wrote: > Where can I find a suitable module or even source code to build here? > > (Centos 7) ELRepo used to provide the kmod-ath5k package. However, the module does not compile under EL7.4 due to the change in the wireless

[CentOS] Update to 3.10.0-693.17.1 breaks ath5k

Where can I find a suitable module or even source code to build here? (Centos 7) Cheers and thanks, Stephen ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] update to Centos7.4: Failed to open \EFI\BOOT\grubx64.efi - Not Found

On 01/12/2018 08:24 PM, johan.vermeul...@telenet.be wrote: - Oorspronkelijk bericht - Van: "Adrian Jenzer" <a.jen...@herzogdemeuron.com> Aan: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org> Verzonden: Dinsdag 9 januari 2018 16:56:57 Onderwerp: Re: [Cen

Re: [CentOS] update to Centos7.4: Failed to open \EFI\BOOT\grubx64.efi - Not Found

- Oorspronkelijk bericht - Van: "Adrian Jenzer" <a.jen...@herzogdemeuron.com> Aan: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org> Verzonden: Dinsdag 9 januari 2018 16:56:57 Onderwerp: Re: [CentOS] update to Centos7.4: Failed to open \EFI\BOOT\grubx64.efi -

Re: [CentOS] update to Centos7.4: Failed to open \EFI\BOOT\grubx64.efi - Not Found

-Original Message- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of johan.vermeul...@telenet.be Sent: Dienstag, 9. Januar 2018 16:34 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: [CentOS] update to Centos7.4: Failed to open \EFI\BOOT\grubx64.efi - Not Found Hello All, updating from

[CentOS] update to Centos7.4: Failed to open \EFI\BOOT\grubx64.efi - Not Found

Hello All, updating from Centos7.3 to Centos7.4 rendered one of our laptops unbootable. EM: Failed to open \EFI\BOOT\grubx64.efi - Not Found Failed to load image \EFI\BOOT\grubx64.efi: Not Found start_image() returned Not Found How could this occur because of an update and how to fix this?

Re: [CentOS] update to 7.4

Thanks all for the thoughts. I have no issues with 7.4 - this was clearly "freek" accident while updating, either internet connection closed on me or something. I brought the unit back here, I tried a few of the suggestions - wasn't really working for me. So I just re-installed 7.4 and all was

Re: [CentOS] update to 7.4

-Original Message-From: John Hodrien <j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.uk> Reply-to: CentOS mailing list <centos@centos.org> To: CentOS mailing list <centos@centos.org> Subject: Re: [CentOS] update to 7.4 Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 15:59:25 +0100 (BST) On Wed, 20 Sep 2017, Greg

Re: [CentOS] update to 7.4

Thanks all for the thoughts. I have no issues with 7.4 - this was clearly "freek" accident while updating, either internet connection closed on me or something. I brought the unit back here, I tried a few of the suggestions - wasn't really working for me. So I just re-installed 7.4 and all was

Re: [CentOS] update to 7.4

On Wed, 20 Sep 2017, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: This happened to me on one of the units during a 7.4 upgrade, and the only way for the system to work for me was to use the previous os. I tried to use the yum remove kernal 7.4 , but yum tried to remove all of the kernels instead of just that last

Re: [CentOS] update to 7.4

On 9/19/2017 9:51 AM, Jerry Geis wrote: > I was doing an update to 7.4 and somewhere in middle the machine died. > > If I drop back to a previous kernel the machine is alive. So how do I say > "forget the previous yum update" and start all over and do it again. > > Booting into the new kernel I

Re: [CentOS] update to 7.4

On Sep 19, 2017, at 12:51 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: > If I drop back to a previous kernel the machine is alive. So how do I say > "forget the previous yum update" and start all over and do it again. Since you are mid-transaction, you should at least try:

Re: [CentOS] update to 7.4

You'll want to look into 'yum history' with the 'info' and 'undo' subcommands. Not sure how well it works for larger updates but I've had success on broken packages. On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Jerry Geis wrote: > I was doing an update to 7.4 and somewhere in middle

Re: [CentOS] update to 7.4

On 9/19/2017 9:51 AM, Jerry Geis wrote: I was doing an update to 7.4 and somewhere in middle the machine died. If I drop back to a previous kernel the machine is alive. So how do I say "forget the previous yum update" and start all over and do it again. Booting into the new kernel I get a

[CentOS] update to 7.4

I was doing an update to 7.4 and somewhere in middle the machine died. If I drop back to a previous kernel the machine is alive. So how do I say "forget the previous yum update" and start all over and do it again. Booting into the new kernel I get a kernel fault. So going back one level on teh

Re: [CentOS] Update from 7.3 to 7.4 failing because of architecture change from PPC64 to PPC

On 09/18/2017 11:32 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: > On 18/09/17 15:18, Armin Kunaschik wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm having problems updating from 7.3 to 7.4 on my ppc64 (IBM Power7 >> p770) installation. >> yum update stops with >> Error: Multilib version problems found. >> [..] >> Protected multilib

Re: [CentOS] Update from 7.3 to 7.4 failing because of architecture change from PPC64 to PPC

On 18/09/17 15:18, Armin Kunaschik wrote: > Hello, > > I'm having problems updating from 7.3 to 7.4 on my ppc64 (IBM Power7 > p770) installation. > yum update stops with > Error: Multilib version problems found. > [..] > Protected multilib versions: systemd-libs-219-42.el7.ppc != >

Re: [CentOS] Update from 7.3 to 7.4 failing because of architecture change from PPC64 to PPC

On 09/18/2017 10:30 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > yum currently has issues with obsoletes .. especially when something > like a noarch file gets obsoleted by an $arch type rpm and there are 2 > (multi) arches available to replace it. It pulls in BOTH, not just the > one arch you have installed ..

Re: [CentOS] Update from 7.3 to 7.4 failing because of architecture change from PPC64 to PPC

yum currently has issues with obsoletes .. especially when something like a noarch file gets obsoleted by an $arch type rpm and there are 2 (multi) arches available to replace it. It pulls in BOTH, not just the one arch you have installed .. and that then pulls in deps for the 2nd arch that you

Re: [CentOS] Update from 7.3 to 7.4 failing because of architecture change from PPC64 to PPC

Yep. This worked. Thanks! Why yum can't figure this out itself? On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 09/18/2017 08:18 AM, Armin Kunaschik wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm having problems updating from 7.3 to 7.4 on my ppc64 (IBM Power7 >> p770) installation. >>

Re: [CentOS] Update from 7.3 to 7.4 failing because of architecture change from PPC64 to PPC

On 09/18/2017 08:18 AM, Armin Kunaschik wrote: > Hello, > > I'm having problems updating from 7.3 to 7.4 on my ppc64 (IBM Power7 > p770) installation. > yum update stops with > Error: Multilib version problems found. > [..] > Protected multilib versions: systemd-libs-219-42.el7.ppc != >

[CentOS] Update from 7.3 to 7.4 failing because of architecture change from PPC64 to PPC

Hello, I'm having problems updating from 7.3 to 7.4 on my ppc64 (IBM Power7 p770) installation. yum update stops with Error: Multilib version problems found. [..] Protected multilib versions: systemd-libs-219-42.el7.ppc != systemd-libs-219-42.el7_4.1.ppc64 When I scroll back through the

Re: [CentOS] Update to 7.4 using DVD

Le 14/09/2017 à 03:02, Johnny Hughes a écrit : > I have a test machine with an NVIDIA card .. let me see if the > proprietary NVIDIA driver works on this for 7.4. I have an NVidia GeForce GT218 card on my workstation, with a twin monitor. Updated everything to CentOS 1708, and the

Re: [CentOS] Update to 7.4 using DVD

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 8:21 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: > On 09/13/2017 04:40 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: > >> I am running the propriatry NVIDIA driver 384.69 for GT 720 support. >> > The ELrepo driver works very well for me with CentOS 7.4.1708 on a Dell > Precision M6700. Here's what I

Re: [CentOS] Update to 7.4 using DVD

Hi Johnny Thanks for the commands I think something was messed up as the yum group install "Gnome Desktop" seems to do the trick. I had all the other items setup, for disable nouveu and all that.for the binary NVIDIA. Anyway - my desktop is back up and running, thanks. Jerry

Re: [CentOS] Update of cloud-init in CentOS 7 Extras

> On 4 Aug 2017, at 16:41, Pierre Riteau wrote: > >> On 13 Jul 2017, at 11:07, Pierre Riteau wrote: >> >>> On 13 Jul 2017, at 01:55, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> >>> On 07/12/2017 02:02 PM, Pierre Riteau wrote: Hello,

Re: [CentOS] Update to 7.4 using DVD

On 09/13/2017 04:40 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: I am running the propriatry NVIDIA driver 384.69 for GT 720 support. The ELrepo driver works very well for me with CentOS 7.4.1708 on a Dell Precision M6700.  Here's what I have: ++ [lowen@localhost ~]$ nvidia-detect -v Probing for supported NVIDIA

Re: [CentOS] Update to 7.4 using DVD

On 09/13/2017 08:46 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 09/13/2017 04:12 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: >> if I do "init 3" to exit graphics. then run startx - it does not start - >> but the only message (no errors) is >> Server terminated successfully. >> > > In order to use the proprietary NVIDIA driver, you

Re: [CentOS] Update to 7.4 using DVD

On 09/13/2017 04:12 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: > if I do "init 3" to exit graphics. then run startx - it does not start - > but the only message (no errors) is > Server terminated successfully. > In order to use the proprietary NVIDIA driver, you will need to disable the nouveau driver in the initrd.

Re: [CentOS] Update to 7.4 using DVD

On 09/13/2017 08:02 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 09/13/2017 07:59 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 09/13/2017 04:12 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: >>> if I do "init 3" to exit graphics. then run startx - it does not start - >>> but the only message (no errors) is >>> Server terminated successfully. >>> >>

Re: [CentOS] Update to 7.4 using DVD

On 09/13/2017 07:59 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 09/13/2017 04:12 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: >> if I do "init 3" to exit graphics. then run startx - it does not start - >> but the only message (no errors) is >> Server terminated successfully. >> > > You can check the /var/log/Xorg.0.log to get some

Re: [CentOS] Update to 7.4 using DVD

On 09/13/2017 04:12 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: > if I do "init 3" to exit graphics. then run startx - it does not start - > but the only message (no errors) is > Server terminated successfully. > You can check the /var/log/Xorg.0.log to get some clues signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

Re: [CentOS] Update to 7.4 using DVD

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 09/13/2017 03:40 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: > > I am running the propriatry NVIDIA driver 384.69 for GT 720 support. > > If you installed it directly from nvidia, you would need to boot to > runlevel 3 and rerun the

Re: [CentOS] Update to 7.4 using DVD

On Wed, September 13, 2017 4:10 pm, Jerry Geis wrote: > I have recompiled the NVIDIA binary driver. That is like an oxymoron ;-) You can not recompile NVIDIA binary driver, you don't have source code for it. All you have is a binary compiled at NVIDIA, and small piece of code for interface

Re: [CentOS] Update to 7.4 using DVD

if I do "init 3" to exit graphics. then run startx - it does not start - but the only message (no errors) is Server terminated successfully. Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Update to 7.4 using DVD

I have recompiled the NVIDIA binary driver. So graphics comes up - just when I click on the user - it restarts. Jerry On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: > I am running the propriatry NVIDIA driver 384.69 for GT 720 support. > > Jerry > >

Re: [CentOS] Update to 7.4 using DVD

On 09/13/2017 03:40 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: > I am running the propriatry NVIDIA driver 384.69 for GT 720 support. Depending on how you installed the driver, it may need to be recompiled for the new kernel. If you installed it directly from nvidia, you would need to boot to runlevel 3 and rerun

Re: [CentOS] Update to 7.4 using DVD

I am running the propriatry NVIDIA driver 384.69 for GT 720 support. Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Update to 7.4 using DVD

I continued to play to get this running. I am close. When X comes up and I click on the user to login - It appears X restarts. I do see a message that gdm was killed by SIGTRAP in the logs. I may just have something not installed at this point. I had to "yum remove" a couple things to allow the

Re: [CentOS] Update to 7.4 using DVD

On 09/13/2017 10:08 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 09/13/2017 09:14 AM, Jerry Geis wrote: >> I am attempting to update to 7.4 using the DVD >> >> I get these errors(truncated list) >> Error: Package: libgpod-0.8.3-14.el7.x86_64 (@epel) >>Requires: libusbmuxd.so.2()(64bit) >>

Re: [CentOS] Update to 7.4 using DVD

On 09/13/2017 09:14 AM, Jerry Geis wrote: > I am attempting to update to 7.4 using the DVD > > I get these errors(truncated list) > Error: Package: libgpod-0.8.3-14.el7.x86_64 (@epel) >Requires: libusbmuxd.so.2()(64bit) >Removing: usbmuxd-1.0.8-11.el7.x86_64 (@anaconda) >

[CentOS] Update to 7.4 using DVD

I am attempting to update to 7.4 using the DVD I get these errors(truncated list) Error: Package: libgpod-0.8.3-14.el7.x86_64 (@epel) Requires: libusbmuxd.so.2()(64bit) Removing: usbmuxd-1.0.8-11.el7.x86_64 (@anaconda) libusbmuxd.so.2()(64bit)

Re: [CentOS] Update of cloud-init in CentOS 7 Extras

> On 13 Jul 2017, at 11:07, Pierre Riteau wrote: > >> On 13 Jul 2017, at 01:55, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> >> On 07/12/2017 02:02 PM, Pierre Riteau wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> The version of cloud-init packaged in CentOS 7 Extras is rather old (0.7.5, >>>

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] New upstream URLs for CentOS update announcements

On 07/13/2017 02:31 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 2017-07-05 at 13:25 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> We are changing the URLs for new CentOS updates from the current link >> types (example): >> >> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1679.html >> >> to these type of links

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] New upstream URLs for CentOS update announcements

Hi, On Wed, 2017-07-05 at 13:25 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > We are changing the URLs for new CentOS updates from the current link > types (example): > > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1679.html > > to these type of links instead (example): > >

Re: [CentOS] Update of cloud-init in CentOS 7 Extras

> On 13 Jul 2017, at 01:55, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > On 07/12/2017 02:02 PM, Pierre Riteau wrote: >> Hello, >> >> The version of cloud-init packaged in CentOS 7 Extras is rather old (0.7.5, >> which was released in 2014). It is missing some functionality that we would >>

Re: [CentOS] Update of cloud-init in CentOS 7 Extras

On 07/12/2017 02:02 PM, Pierre Riteau wrote: > Hello, > > The version of cloud-init packaged in CentOS 7 Extras is rather old (0.7.5, > which was released in 2014). It is missing some functionality that we would > like to use, as well as important bug fixes. > Before I tackle rebuilding the

[CentOS] Update of cloud-init in CentOS 7 Extras

Hello, The version of cloud-init packaged in CentOS 7 Extras is rather old (0.7.5, which was released in 2014). It is missing some functionality that we would like to use, as well as important bug fixes. Before I tackle rebuilding the package myself, I would like to know if there is a plan to

[CentOS-announce] New upstream URLs for CentOS update announcements

We are changing the URLs for new CentOS updates from the current link types (example): https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-1679.html to these type of links instead (example): https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1679 The reason for the change is that RHN Hosted will reach its service

Re: [CentOS] update clamav to 0.99.2

I'm running 6.8 and now it all makes sense. Thanks On 07/09/16 09:17, Duncan Brown wrote: On 09/07/2016 14:15, Walter H. wrote: On 09.07.2016 14:39, Pete Geenhuizen wrote: I don't see it either. On 07/09/16 08:36, Walter H. wrote: On 07.07.2016 22:19, Helmut Drodofsky wrote: Helo, update

  1   2   3   4   5   >