On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Niki Kovacs wrote:
John a écrit :
>
> I do not and did not mean to be offensive to Dag, and I apologize if I
> was--it just seemed like an issue that would be affecting a lot more
> people
> than just me and I wanted to see
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Niki Kovacs wrote:
John a écrit :
I do not and did not mean to be offensive to Dag, and I apologize if I
was--it just seemed like an issue that would be affecting a lot more
people
than just me and I wanted to see what others were doing about it.
So far I've not heard
On Tue, 23 Sep 2008, fred smith wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 09:12:12AM +0200, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
fred smith wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 08:19:37PM -0400, John wrote:
So what's the proper workaround here? As far as I'm concerned, Dag has
broken the update system on our Centos
On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 2:16 AM, Niki Kovacs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ralph Angenendt a écrit :
>>
>> And if all that could be discussed on rpmforge users mailing list
>> *where* other people from the rpmforge community also read and post, it
>> would have been even greater >:)
>
> Sorry for th
Ralph Angenendt a écrit :
And if all that could be discussed on rpmforge users mailing list
*where* other people from the rpmforge community also read and post, it
would have been even greater >:)
Sorry for that.
Niki
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@
Niki Kovacs wrote:
> My suggestion to Dag (with all respect taken): why not create a
> [rf-testing] repo for the critical stuff, a bit like [kbsingh]?
>
> I repeat, since this is important: please do not take offense. Shit
> happens, I know.
And if all that could be discussed on rpmforge users
John a écrit :
I do not and did not mean to be offensive to Dag, and I apologize if I
was--it just seemed like an issue that would be affecting a lot more people
than just me and I wanted to see what others were doing about it.
So far I've not heard what that is.
I second that. Dag is doing gr
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of fred smith
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 7:57 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Update troubles for wxGTK apps
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 09:12:12AM +0200, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 09:12:12AM +0200, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>
>
> fred smith wrote:
> >On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 08:19:37PM -0400, John wrote:
> >>So what's the proper workaround here? As far as I'm concerned, Dag has
> >>broken the update system on our Centos boxes. Is there any other wa
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 01:54:20AM -0400, John wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of fred smith
> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 10:09 PM
> To: 'CentOS mailing list'
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Update
John a écrit :
I've had that set up ever since I first added any repositories.
I've got it set to a priority of 10, is there a better value to use?
1 = highest priority <==> packages never get squashed
99 = lowest priority
So basically you're free to choose any value between 1 and 99. The l
fred smith wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 08:19:37PM -0400, John wrote:
So what's the proper workaround here? As far as I'm concerned, Dag has
broken the update system on our Centos boxes. Is there any other way to
allow my system to be updated than to disable using Dag's repo?
(not including
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of fred smith
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 10:09 PM
To: 'CentOS mailing list'
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Update troubles for wxGTK apps
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 08:19:37PM -0400, John wrote:
>
&g
Robert wrote:
> fred smith wrote:
>> So what's the proper workaround here? As far as I'm concerned, Dag
>> has broken
> echo "I have `rpm -qa | grep rf | wc -l` reasons to apologize."
*applause*
Cheers,
Ralph
pgpZmFT4w1TWa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 7:08 PM, fred smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've had that set up ever since I first added any repositories.
> I've got it set to a priority of 10, is there a better value to use?
>
># Name: RPMforge RPM Repository for Red Hat Enterprise 5 - dag
># URL:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 08:19:37PM -0400, John wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of fred smith
> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 7:59 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Update tr
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of fred smith
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 7:59 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Update troubles for wxGTK apps
So what's the proper workaround here? As far as I'm concerne
fred smith wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 06:27:45PM +0200, Marcus Moeller wrote:
Good Evening.
I believe what Dag is saying is that, if you wish to use audacity, you
cannot update wxGTK. Conversely, if you update wxGTK, you cannot use
audacity. I'm sure he will eventually resolve
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 06:27:45PM +0200, Marcus Moeller wrote:
> Good Evening.
>
> >>> I believe what Dag is saying is that, if you wish to use audacity, you
> >>> cannot update wxGTK. Conversely, if you update wxGTK, you cannot use
> >>> audacity. I'm sure he will eventually resolve the issue.
Good Evening.
>>> I believe what Dag is saying is that, if you wish to use audacity, you
>>> cannot update wxGTK. Conversely, if you update wxGTK, you cannot use
>>> audacity. I'm sure he will eventually resolve the issue.
>>
>> In the meantime, how are we supposed to go about to install AMule,
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 12:20 AM, Niki Kovacs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Akemi Yagi a écrit :
>
>>
>> I believe what Dag is saying is that, if you wish to use audacity, you
>> cannot update wxGTK. Conversely, if you update wxGTK, you cannot use
>> audacity. I'm sure he will eventually resolve t
Akemi Yagi a écrit :
I believe what Dag is saying is that, if you wish to use audacity, you
cannot update wxGTK. Conversely, if you update wxGTK, you cannot use
audacity. I'm sure he will eventually resolve the issue.
In the meantime, how are we supposed to go about to install AMule, VLC
a
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 8:19 PM, fred smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 08:55:04PM +0200, Niki Kovacs wrote:
>> Akemi Yagi a écrit :
>>
>> >
>> >Some info here:
>> >
>> >http://planet.centos.org/
>>
>> Thanks for the info.
>>
>> Niki
>
> but that doesn't say anything about
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 08:55:04PM +0200, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Akemi Yagi a écrit :
>
> >
> >Some info here:
> >
> >http://planet.centos.org/
>
> Thanks for the info.
>
> Niki
but that doesn't say anything about how it is (or will be) resolved...
Are we expected to remove Audacity from our sys
Akemi Yagi a écrit :
Some info here:
http://planet.centos.org/
Thanks for the info.
Niki
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Niki Kovacs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a CentOS 5.2 desktop with the RPMForge repo enabled. I just ran 'yum
> update', and there seems to be some trouble with the wxGTK apps. A simple
> 'yum update' gives this error message:
> So it looks like Aud
Hi,
I have a CentOS 5.2 desktop with the RPMForge repo enabled. I just ran
'yum update', and there seems to be some trouble with the wxGTK apps. A
simple 'yum update' gives this error message:
--8<
--> Finished Dependency Res
27 matches
Mail list logo
