On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 23:32 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
David McGuffey wrote:
I tried VMWare's EXSi 4.0 on bare metal, and failed. Then I tried
VirtualBox on CentOS 5.3 and failed.
What did these fail to do?
Sorry it has taken so long to get back.
After screwing around for weeks
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 10:18 +0100, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
I selected one virtual CPU for the XP load...primarily because I want to
run a couple more VMs and the guidance was to allocate one real CPU per
VM.
My understanding is that Win XP will perform a fundamentally different
install
David McGuffey wrote:
On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 23:32 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
David McGuffey wrote:
I tried VMWare's EXSi 4.0 on bare metal, and failed. Then I tried
VirtualBox on CentOS 5.3 and failed.
What did these fail to do?
Sorry it has taken so long to get back.
After screwing
I selected one virtual CPU for the XP load...primarily because I want to
run a couple more VMs and the guidance was to allocate one real CPU per
VM.
My understanding is that Win XP will perform a fundamentally different
install depending on whether it detects 1 or many CPU. So if you ever
plan
I've been doing a lot of research on virtualization (VMWare, EXSi, xen,
kvm, VirtualBox, etc.) and ended up choosing kvm. I'm very surprised at
how quick I was able to bring up a WinXP VM.
# FUTURE OF KVM
David, I'm currently doing exactly the same (researching and comparing
various
On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 14:50 +0100, Mathieu Baudier wrote:
I've been doing a lot of research on virtualization (VMWare, EXSi, xen,
kvm, VirtualBox, etc.) and ended up choosing kvm. I'm very surprised at
how quick I was able to bring up a WinXP VM.
# FUTURE OF KVM
David, I'm currently
Well, it turns out that qemu is required and kvm-qemu-img was the
source of the problem. Removing this and installing qemu instead
fixed the problem.
Actually I did the other way round:
yum remove qemu (which is in the extras repo)
yum install -x qemu kvm (excluding qemu and thus
I've been doing a lot of research on virtualization (VMWare, EXSi, xen,
kvm, VirtualBox, etc.) and ended up choosing kvm. I'm very surprised at
how quick I was able to bring up a WinXP VM.
I tried VMWare's EXSi 4.0 on bare metal, and failed. Then I tried
VirtualBox on CentOS 5.3 and failed. So
On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 16:21 -0500, James B. Byrne wrote:
On Fri, November 6, 2009 13:50, James B. Byrne wrote:
Evidently, one gets XEN. I will get kvm from extras and go about
installing it manually.
# grep 'vmx' /proc/cpuinfo
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce
David McGuffey wrote:
I tried VMWare's EXSi 4.0 on bare metal, and failed. Then I tried
VirtualBox on CentOS 5.3 and failed.
What did these fail to do?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
10 matches
Mail list logo
