2010/2/2 Rafał Radecki :
> I plan to use virtualization in my production environment. I plan to use one
> of the following options:
I am very happy with XenServer in our data centre. Use qemu for
testing / devel purposes.
Ben
___
CentOS mailing list
Ce
On Thursday, February 04, 2010 10:20 AM, David McGuffey wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 11:51 -0500, Max Hetrick wrote:
>> Bobby wrote:
>>
>>> Odd, for some time I have had USB support with Sun's Virtualbox. It was a
>>> problem at some point but works fine here (Using Fedora 11). I'm pretty
>>>
On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 11:51 -0500, Max Hetrick wrote:
> Bobby wrote:
>
> > Odd, for some time I have had USB support with Sun's Virtualbox. It was a
> > problem at some point but works fine here (Using Fedora 11). I'm pretty
> > sure I
> > watched a USB CAM on XP (as a VM client) a while ago.
On Thursday, February 04, 2010 01:52 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 10:14:50AM +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
>> On Wednesday, February 03, 2010 12:43 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
>>> Rafa? Radecki wrote:
Hi All.
I plan to use virtualization in my production environ
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Max Hetrick wrote:
> a arias wrote:
>> Over the last year I have worked with Xen, KVM, VMware ESX and Sun
>> VirtualBox. VirtualBox is my recommendation, hands down.
>
> I think this is too vague of a opinion on virtualization use. I think it
> depends on what you'r
Max Hetrick wrote:
a arias wrote:
Over the last year I have worked with Xen, KVM, VMware ESX and Sun
VirtualBox. VirtualBox is my recommendation, hands down.
I think this is too vague of a opinion on virtualization use. I think it
depends on what you're doing with it.
VirtualBox is
a arias wrote:
> Over the last year I have worked with Xen, KVM, VMware ESX and Sun
> VirtualBox. VirtualBox is my recommendation, hands down.
I think this is too vague of a opinion on virtualization use. I think it
depends on what you're doing with it.
VirtualBox is a nice piece of software fo
On 2/3/2010 1:19 PM, a arias wrote:
> Over the last year I have worked with Xen, KVM, VMware ESX and Sun
> VirtualBox. VirtualBox is my recommendation, hands down.
>
Virtualbox has the unique advantage of having a free version that can
run on intel Macs. I can't think of anything else that makes
Over the last year I have worked with Xen, KVM, VMware ESX and Sun
VirtualBox. VirtualBox is my recommendation, hands down.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 10:14:50AM +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
> > On Wednesday, February 03, 2010 12:43 AM, Jo
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 10:14:50AM +0800, Christopher Chan wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 03, 2010 12:43 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> > Rafa? Radecki wrote:
> >> Hi All.
> >>
> >> I plan to use virtualization in my production environment. I plan to
> >> use one of the following options:
> >> - KVM;
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> just to clarify, you're saying that KVM requires H/W virtualization
> support, either VT-x or AMD-V, yes? because at this point, i don't
> think that really qualifies as "special hardware" anymore, it's pretty
> common.
>
>
Yes common
Am 03.02.2010 00:07, schrieb Kwan Lowe:
> KVM
...
> back-end storage for the VMs so you can do snapshot backups. I'm
> awaiting support for memory de-duplication on the host side as this
> can really help cram more VMs into a box (my workloads are very light
> on memory/cpu but libraries/packages c
> Xen
> From the CentOS side it's very similar to KVM if you use the virt
> tools. Performance is extremely good with paravirtualized machines.
> It's a workhorse and quite stable, but the GUI is not so great.
> Networking is a bear to configure. Requires separate kernel. I've
> never quite go
On Wednesday, February 03, 2010 12:43 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> Rafa? Radecki wrote:
>> Hi All.
>>
>> I plan to use virtualization in my production environment. I plan to
>> use one of the following options:
>> - KVM;
>> - VMWare Esxi;
>> - VMWare Workstation.
>>
>> I plan to install Windows 2008
On 2/2/2010 6:20 AM, Rafa? Radecki wrote:
Hi All.
I plan to use virtualization in my production environment. I plan to
use one of the following options:
- KVM;
- VMWare Esxi;
- VMWare Workstation.
I plan to install Windows 2008 as a guest. I want to use something
like LVM snapshots for backu
2010/2/2 Rafał Radecki :
> Hi All.
>
> I plan to use virtualization in my production environment. I plan to use one
> of the following options:
> - KVM;
> - VMWare Esxi;
> - VMWare Workstation.
>
> I plan to install Windows 2008 as a guest. I want to use something like LVM
> snapshots for backups.
So I have tried and used most, I am anxious to see redhats next version of
KVM stuff that will make it into rhel 6, whenever that is, once the
management tools on LINUX catch up I will be moving towards that. I am
currently using vmware server 2 on centos 5.4 and while there were some
issues there
On 2/2/2010 11:09 AM, Greg Bailey wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> I have to agree that ESXi is better, but I've had VMware server running
>> for years (mostly 1.x versions on CentOS 3.x, but also some CentOS 5.x
>> and VMware 2.x) with no surprises other than jumpy clocks. The servers
>> have some
Les Mikesell wrote:
> I have to agree that ESXi is better, but I've had VMware server running
> for years (mostly 1.x versions on CentOS 3.x, but also some CentOS 5.x
> and VMware 2.x) with no surprises other than jumpy clocks. The servers
> have sometimes been shut down for power work but I've
Bobby wrote:
> Interesting. Would you mind sharing what files that is as I've never
> encountered it but would like to know more if/when I do? What version (of VB)
> are you using?
I'm running the latest version: 3.1.2 build 56127.
I had to perform these steps to get USB to work on a Linux or
On 2/2/2010 10:43 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
>
>> I plan to use virtualization in my production environment. I plan to
>> use one of the following options:
>> - KVM;
>> - VMWare Esxi;
>> - VMWare Workstation.
>>
>> I plan to install Windows 2008 as a guest. I want to use something
>> like LVM snapsho
On Tuesday 02 February 2010 11:51:43 Max Hetrick wrote:
> Bobby wrote:
> > Odd, for some time I have had USB support with Sun's Virtualbox. It was a
> > problem at some point but works fine here (Using Fedora 11). I'm pretty
> > sure I watched a USB CAM on XP (as a VM client) a while ago.
>
> Well
Bobby wrote:
> Odd, for some time I have had USB support with Sun's Virtualbox. It was a
> problem at some point but works fine here (Using Fedora 11). I'm pretty sure
> I
> watched a USB CAM on XP (as a VM client) a while ago.
Well, it's supported and works, however, you have to remount usbfs
On Tuesday 02 February 2010 11:08:21 Max Hetrick wrote:
> There is a work around for USB support on Linux for VirtualBox, where
> VMware works a bit better with USB.
Odd, for some time I have had USB support with Sun's Virtualbox. It was a
problem at some point but works fine here (Using Fedora
Rafa? Radecki wrote:
> Hi All.
>
> I plan to use virtualization in my production environment. I plan to
> use one of the following options:
> - KVM;
> - VMWare Esxi;
> - VMWare Workstation.
>
> I plan to install Windows 2008 as a guest. I want to use something
> like LVM snapshots for backups. St
Jake Shipton wrote:
> Hi, Personally, I'd recommend VMware Workstation. Always been good for
> me, however lately I have been trying out Virtualbox (PUEL) :-). They
> have an Open Source Edition also (Virtualbox), only it lacks USB
> Support. If you go on there website, you can see the 3 missing f
On 02/02/10 11:20, Rafał Radecki wrote:
> Hi All.
>
> I plan to use virtualization in my production environment. I plan to use one
> of the following options:
> - KVM;
> - VMWare Esxi;
> - VMWare Workstation.
>
> I plan to install Windows 2008 as a guest. I want to use something like LVM
> snapsh
Rafa? Radecki wrote:
> Hi All.
>
> I plan to use virtualization in my production environment. I plan to use
> one of the following options:
> - KVM;
> - VMWare Esxi;
> - VMWare Workstation.
>
> I plan to install Windows 2008 as a guest. I want to use something like
> LVM snapshots for backups.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 6:05 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Feb 2010, Victor Padro wrote:
>
>> You can only install KVM or VMWare Workstation/Server in CentOS, I
>> think you should try KVM, because it's opensource and it supports
>> Windows but you need special hardware like the latest CP
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 07:05:59AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Feb 2010, Victor Padro wrote:
>
> > You can only install KVM or VMWare Workstation/Server in CentOS, I
> > think you should try KVM, because it's opensource and it supports
> > Windows but you need special hardware like
Rafał Radecki ha scritto:
> Hi All.
>
> I plan to use virtualization in my production environment. I plan to use
> one of the following options:
> - KVM;
> - VMWare Esxi;
> - VMWare Workstation.
>
> I plan to install Windows 2008 as a guest. I want to use something like
> LVM snapshots for backup
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010, Victor Padro wrote:
> You can only install KVM or VMWare Workstation/Server in CentOS, I
> think you should try KVM, because it's opensource and it supports
> Windows but you need special hardware like the latest CPUs from AMD
> or Intel...
just to clarify, you're saying tha
2010/2/2 Rafał Radecki :
> Hi All.
>
> I plan to use virtualization in my production environment. I plan to use one
> of the following options:
> - KVM;
> - VMWare Esxi;
> - VMWare Workstation.
>
> I plan to install Windows 2008 as a guest. I want to use something like LVM
> snapshots for backups.
Hi All.
I plan to use virtualization in my production environment. I plan to use one
of the following options:
- KVM;
- VMWare Esxi;
- VMWare Workstation.
I plan to install Windows 2008 as a guest. I want to use something like LVM
snapshots for backups. Stability is also very important, the guest
34 matches
Mail list logo
