Re: [CentOS] When are Logwatch errors really errors

2011-01-19 Thread Lisandro Grullon
Hi jason, Thank you for pointing this out. I am running 5.5 in 5 new boxes suddenly the boxes would start randomly rebooting. Checking the logs point out to smartd in all the boxes. I should all of them out except one. In that one I disable and shutdown smartd and the machine has been running ok

Re: [CentOS] When are Logwatch errors really errors

2011-01-08 Thread Robert Heller
At Fri, 07 Jan 2011 23:49:34 +0100 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Robert Heller wrote: > > >> /dev/sda -a -d sat -m root -M exec /usr/share/smartmontools/smartd-runner > >> /dev/sdb -a -d sat -m root -M exec /usr/share/smartmontools/smartd-runner > > > > This will bite you if/when you install

Re: [CentOS] When are Logwatch errors really errors

2011-01-07 Thread Jason S-M
>>> /dev/sda -a -d sat -m root -M exec /usr/share/smartmontools/smartd-runner >>> /dev/sdb -a -d sat -m root -M exec /usr/share/smartmontools/smartd-runner >> >> This will bite you if/when you install another disk drive. >> >> You are better off with the 'DEVICESCAN -H -m root' option in place.

Re: [CentOS] When are Logwatch errors really errors

2011-01-07 Thread Timothy Murphy
Robert Heller wrote: >> /dev/sda -a -d sat -m root -M exec /usr/share/smartmontools/smartd-runner >> /dev/sdb -a -d sat -m root -M exec /usr/share/smartmontools/smartd-runner > > This will bite you if/when you install another disk drive. > > You are better off with the 'DEVICESCAN -H -m root' op

Re: [CentOS] When are Logwatch errors really errors

2011-01-07 Thread Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message- > From: m.roth > Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 12:45 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] When are Logwatch errors really errors > > Jason Pyeron wrote: > >> From: S-M > >> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 11:26 &

Re: [CentOS] When are Logwatch errors really errors

2011-01-07 Thread m . roth
Jason Pyeron wrote: >> From: S-M >> Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 11:26 >> >> I don't know enough about when errors are *really* errors. So >> I google a lot to read and learn. >> >> I have a few things in my Logwatch that I want to make sure I >> understand >> 3. automount >> **Unmatched Entries

Re: [CentOS] When are Logwatch errors really errors

2011-01-07 Thread Robert Heller
At Fri, 7 Jan 2011 08:25:41 -0800 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Hi All, > > I don't know enough about when errors are *really* errors. So I google a lot > to read and learn. > > I have a few things in my Logwatch that I want to make sure I understand > > 1. smartd > **Unmatched Entries** >

Re: [CentOS] When are Logwatch errors really errors

2011-01-07 Thread Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message- > From: S-M > Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 11:26 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: [CentOS] When are Logwatch errors really errors > > Hi All, > > I don't know enough about when errors are *really* errors. So > I google a l

[CentOS] When are Logwatch errors really errors

2011-01-07 Thread Jason S-M
Hi All, I don't know enough about when errors are *really* errors. So I google a lot to read and learn. I have a few things in my Logwatch that I want to make sure I understand 1. smartd **Unmatched Entries** Problem creating device name scan list Device /dev/sda: using '-d sat' for ATA disk b