On 12/10/2011 4:10 AM, Andy Smith wrote:
On 10 December 2011 10:41, Hakan Koseogluha...@koseoglu.org wrote:
On 10/12/11 03:36, An Yang wrote:
I think all the blocks were removed, and 6.2 will be released very soon.
Unless it was parked on a hill backwards and now rolling down the hill!
On 12/10/2011 6:53 AM, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 19:01 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Let's go ahead and get this flame thread started now to save time.
The CentOS team sucks ... it took days to do 6.1 ... it is going to
take twice as long to get 6.2
My mom said CentOS
On 10/12/11 03:36, An Yang wrote:
I think all the blocks were removed, and 6.2 will be released very soon.
Unless it was parked on a hill backwards and now rolling down the hill!
Congratulations to the CentOS team again!
___
CentOS mailing list
On 10 December 2011 10:41, Hakan Koseoglu ha...@koseoglu.org wrote:
On 10/12/11 03:36, An Yang wrote:
I think all the blocks were removed, and 6.2 will be released very soon.
Unless it was parked on a hill backwards and now rolling down the hill!
Damn, and I haven't even installed 6.0 yet ...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Johnny,
Let's go ahead and get this flame thread started now to save time.
The CentOS team sucks ... it took days to do 6.1 ... it is going to
take twice as long to get 6.2
My mom said CentOS blows.
kbsingh is ugly.
hughesjr is
On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 19:01 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Let's go ahead and get this flame thread started now to save time.
The CentOS team sucks ... it took days to do 6.1 ... it is going to
take twice as long to get 6.2
My mom said CentOS blows.
kbsingh is ugly.
hughesjr is old
Hi Louis,
come on Johnny, there are still plenty of people that appreciate the
work you guys do and are happy to see 6.1 released. Please give us first
a chance to say thank you so much!
Indeed, and since I omitted that in my last post (I probably was too busy
chuckling), I'd like to chime
A big thank you to the CentOS team for the 6.1 release.
And nice to see that there will be a CR repo again.
See you all at FOSDEM2012.
Maarten
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 10/12/11 01:01, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Let's go ahead and get this flame thread started now to save time.
The CentOS team sucks ... it took days to do 6.1 ... it is going to
take twice as long to get 6.2
My mom said CentOS blows.
kbsingh is ugly.
hughesjr is old and fat.
OK
Vreme: 12/10/2011 02:01 AM, Johnny Hughes piše:
Let's go ahead and get this flame thread started now to save time.
The CentOS team sucks ... it took days to do 6.1 ... it is going to
take twice as long to get 6.2
My mom said CentOS blows.
kbsingh is ugly.
hughesjr is old and fat.
On 12/10/2011 02:02 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
6.2 should arrive really fast, believe me !
and if you use the CR repo, you should already be up-to-date, all
updated packages are going to be soon in it before the complete tree is
built for 6.2 !
# CentOS-CR.repo
#
# The continuous release
Let's go ahead and get this flame thread started now to save time.
The CentOS team sucks ... it took days to do 6.1 ... it is going to
take twice as long to get 6.2
My mom said CentOS blows.
kbsingh is ugly.
hughesjr is old and fat.
OK ... that should do.
signature.asc
Description:
On 12/09/2011 08:01 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Let's go ahead and get this flame thread started now to save time.
The CentOS team sucks ... it took days to do 6.1 ... it is going to
take twice as long to get 6.2
My mom said CentOS blows.
kbsingh is ugly.
hughesjr is old and fat.
At 2011-12-09 Fri 19:01 -0600，Johnny Hughes wroted：
it took days to do 6.1 ... it is going to
take twice as long to get 6.2
I think all the blocks were removed, and 6.2 will be released very soon.
signature.asc
Description: 这是信件的数字签名部分
___
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 11:36:16AM +0800, An Yang wrote:
I think all the blocks were removed, and 6.2 will be released very soon.
I think the moon is made of blue cheese. These types of conjecture are
useless.
John
--
No man can
I think this was an attempt at humour, but it didn't work very well. :)
For a second I thought it was a sarcastic troll. Then I saw Johnny's
name on the email. It gave me a smile and a chuckle.
Seriously tho folks. Please let's not get into that flaming thread yet again. :)
--
Drew
Nothing
On Fri, 9 Dec 2011, Digimer wrote:
I think this was an attempt at humour, but it didn't work very well.
:)
Au contraire, I thought it was hysterical. True, it was more blatantly
ad hominem than the thinly veiled centos lucks for being late
messages this list has seen in the past 12 months,
On 10 December 2011 01:01, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
Let's go ahead and get this flame thread started now to save time.
The CentOS team sucks ... it took days to do 6.1 ... it is going to
take twice as long to get 6.2
My mom said CentOS blows.
kbsingh is ugly.
hughesjr
18 matches
Mail list logo
