-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 13.01.2015 04:25, Somers-Harris, David | David | OPS wrote:
On 2015-01-06, Keith Keller wrote:
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 10:37:46AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
2. If someone comes up with a place to get said data, THEN
we could properly publish
PS: I guess this discussion should move to the devel list?
I was actually beginning to think the same think.
I'll move this to the devel list.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I'll move this to the devel list.
I've created the following thread.
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2015-January/012600.html
Thanks for the discussions so far. I look forward to making more progress on
centos-devel.
___
CentOS mailing
On 2015-01-06, Keith Keller wrote:
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 10:37:46AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
2. If someone comes up with a place to get said data, THEN we could
properly publish that data in some way.
It would be a hack, but you could probably subscribe an automated
account to the
On 01/07/2015 3:04 AM, Liam O'Toole wrote:
Maybe you missed the big announcement:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-January/020100.html
Thanks for this Liam!
It gave me a lot of context I was missing.
On 01/07/2015 4:25 AM, Jim Perrin wrote:
Nope. We're still air-gapped
On 2015-01-06, Somers-Harris, David | David | OPS
david.somers-har...@mail.rakuten.com wrote:
1. Blatant screen scraping is a violation of the terms of service
for RHN .. so where is a SOURCE of information for something like
this:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-2024.html
If you
On 01/06/2015 04:25 AM, Liam O'Toole wrote:
On 2015-01-06, Somers-Harris, David | David | OPS
david.somers-har...@mail.rakuten.com wrote:
1. Blatant screen scraping is a violation of the terms of service
for RHN .. so where is a SOURCE of information for something like
this:
On 01/06/2015 12:03 PM, Liam O'Toole wrote:
Thanks for all that. My contribution was in response to the question Is
there some official communication channel between the CentOS Project and
Red Hat? I should have trimmed more carefully and saved you some
keystrokes.
Nope. We're still
On 01/05/2015 04:37 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
2. If someone comes up with a place to get said data, THEN we could
properly publish that data in some way.
get it, then validate it, then we can push it as known correct.
--
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ |
On 2015-01-06, Johnny Hughes
joh...@centos.org wrote:
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--===4697670779706124595== Content-Type: multipart/signed;
micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature;
boundary=MBFscW2dH0g022mxj8O937qiaWFFIRB5O
This is an
On 01/04/2015 06:00 PM, Somers-Harris, David | David | OPS wrote:
However, luckily, Gmane archives everything just fine.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.centos.devel/12370/focus=12375
Thanks Steven for bringing this thread to my attention.
So it looks like there was already a discussion
1. Blatant screen scraping is a violation of the terms of service for RHN ..
so where is a SOURCE of information for something like this:
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-2024.html
If you read this:
https://access.redhat.com/help/terms/
then, one can not just grab all the info on
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 10:37:46AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
2. If someone comes up with a place to get said data, THEN we could
properly publish that data in some way.
It would be a hack, but you could probably subscribe an automated
account to the enterprise-watch-list mailing list:
On 2015-01-05, Jonathan Billings billi...@negate.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 10:37:46AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
2. If someone comes up with a place to get said data, THEN we could
properly publish that data in some way.
It would be a hack, but you could probably subscribe an
However, luckily, Gmane archives everything just fine.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.centos.devel/12370/focus=12375
Thanks Steven for bringing this thread to my attention.
So it looks like there was already a discussion about this in September, and it
ended with two action items.
1.
On 03/01/15 07:12, Steven Crothers wrote:
David,
The CentOS team has taken the stance that they do not understand what
is required for this, so, they will not be including it under any
circumstances.
umm, no.
I am unable to locate the thread in the archive:
David,
The CentOS team has taken the stance that they do not understand what
is required for this, so, they will not be including it under any
circumstances.
I am unable to locate the thread in the archive:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2014-September/thread.html
However,
Hello,
Currently The CentOS project publishes errata on its CentOS Announce mailing
list. In order to import this into a package management system (like Katello on
The Foreman), one needs to parse the mailing list and convert it into XML
before importing it. This is done to some extent on
18 matches
Mail list logo
