[CentOS] Why tzdata-2007h [RHEA-2007:0928-05] only for CentOS 2?

2007-10-11 Thread Radu-Cristian FOTESCU
I might be stupid and ask an idiot or offensive question, but here it is: Why was tzdata-2007h [RHEA-2007:0928-05] only released for CentOS 2, when upstream has released it for all the versions? The guys from X/OS have released it for 5.0 along with the other updates (on Oct. 9

Re: [CentOS] Why tzdata-2007h [RHEA-2007:0928-05] only for CentOS 2?

2007-10-11 Thread Tru Huynh
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 09:21:55AM -0400, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote: I might be stupid and ask an idiot or offensive question, but here it is: Why was tzdata-2007h [RHEA-2007:0928-05] only released for CentOS 2, when upstream has released it for all the versions? It has been released

Re: [CentOS] Why tzdata-2007h [RHEA-2007:0928-05] only for CentOS 2?

2007-10-11 Thread Radu-Cristian FOTESCU
Mea culpa, I can see now that tzdata-2007h was released for CentOS-4 and CentOS-5 too, on Oct. 6... it's just I didn't see the corresponding e-mails! Sorry about that. Thanks, R-C Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving junk email the boot with the All-new Yahoo!

Re: [CentOS] Why tzdata-2007h [RHEA-2007:0928-05] only for CentOS 2?

2007-10-11 Thread Robert
Radu-Cristian FOTESCU wrote: I might be stupid and ask an idiot or offensive question, but here it is: Why was tzdata-2007h [RHEA-2007:0928-05] only released for CentOS 2, when upstream has released it for all the versions? The guys from X/OS have released it for 5.0 along with the other

Re: [CentOS] Why tzdata-2007h [RHEA-2007:0928-05] only for CentOS 2?

2007-10-11 Thread Radu-Cristian FOTESCU
--- Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ummm. This is from my CentOS 5 /var/log/yum.log: Oct 06 14:30:09 Updated: tzdata.noarch 2007h-1.el5 Sorry, my bad. I trusted *too much* the mails from centos-announce, and the only tzdata-2007h e-mail announcement was for CentOS 2! R-C Be