Joshua Baker-LePain wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 at 7:03am, Johnny Hughes wrote
I would also not use XFS in production ... but that is just me. If
XFS was production ready, it would be in RHEL. Since it is turned on
in Fedora and since it is purposely turned off in RHEL, one can
reasonably con
On Mon, 2 Jun 2008 at 7:03am, Johnny Hughes wrote
I would also not use XFS in production ... but that is just me. If XFS was
production ready, it would be in RHEL. Since it is turned on in Fedora and
since it is purposely turned off in RHEL, one can reasonably conclude that
the upstream peop
Linux wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I also normally build all the extras kmods while I build the centosplus
kernel, so they were also not yet done ... however I did go ahead and build
I dont intend to blame anybody but kmod_xfs was a couple of
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Johnny Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I also normally build all the extras kmods while I build the centosplus
> kernel, so they were also not yet done ... however I did go ahead and build
I dont intend to blame anybody but kmod_xfs was a couple of days late
fo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am attempting to implement XFS on a new system.
System:
Supermicro SC846 TQ-R900B - rack-mountable
SUPERMICRO X7DWN+ - motherboard
3ware 9650SE-24M8 - storage controller
10 Hitachi DeskStar 7K1000 - hard drive - 1 TB
8GB Ram
2 Intel Quad-Core Xeon E5420 / 2.5 GHz proce
I am attempting to implement XFS on a new system.
System:
Supermicro SC846 TQ-R900B - rack-mountable
SUPERMICRO X7DWN+ - motherboard
3ware 9650SE-24M8 - storage controller
10 Hitachi DeskStar 7K1000 - hard drive - 1 TB
8GB Ram
2 Intel Quad-Core Xeon E5420 / 2.5 GHz processor
Installed Centos 5.1
6 matches
Mail list logo
