On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 6:24 PM, Tom Lanyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Trying to upgrade someone's workstation here to 5.2 (was installed from a
> 5.0 DVD I think).
>
> The RPMs on our internal mirror are in-tact and pass a 'rpm --checksig'
> test, yet when I run a 'yum upgrade' a la
On Aug 24, 2008, at 9:25 PM, "Tom Lanyon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi list,
Trying to upgrade someone's workstation here to 5.2 (was installed
from a 5.0 DVD I think).
The RPMs on our internal mirror are in-tact and pass a 'rpm --
checksig' test, yet when I run a 'yum upgrade' a large po
On 25/08/2008, at 12:17 PM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
What's the exact error you get from yum? One thing you can do is to
check the output of sha1sum against the RPM in the Yum cache on the
client machine and compare that against the checksum value stored in
the primary.xml.gz file for one of the b
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 12:10:25PM +0930, Tom Lanyon wrote:
> On 25/08/2008, at 10:54 AM, Tom Lanyon wrote:
>
>> Hi list,
>>
>> Trying to upgrade someone's workstation here to 5.2 (was installed from a
>> 5.0 DVD I think).
>>
>> The RPMs on our internal mirror are in-tact and pass a 'rpm --checksi
On 25/08/2008, at 10:54 AM, Tom Lanyon wrote:
Hi list,
Trying to upgrade someone's workstation here to 5.2 (was installed
from a 5.0 DVD I think).
The RPMs on our internal mirror are in-tact and pass a 'rpm --
checksig' test, yet when I run a 'yum upgrade' a large portion of
them are cor
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 11:42:14AM +0930, Tom Lanyon wrote:
> On 25/08/2008, at 11:37 AM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
>
>> How are you sync'ing the RPM's on your internal mirror? Do you run
>> createrepo locally to generate the metadata yourself or just rely on
>> the mirror's information?
>
> We just s
On 25/08/2008, at 11:37 AM, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
How are you sync'ing the RPM's on your internal mirror? Do you run
createrepo locally to generate the metadata yourself or just rely on
the mirror's information?
We just sync 1:1 and rely on the mirror's metadata. As far as I know,
there sho
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 10:54:05AM +0930, Tom Lanyon wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Trying to upgrade someone's workstation here to 5.2 (was installed from a
> 5.0 DVD I think).
>
> The RPMs on our internal mirror are in-tact and pass a 'rpm --checksig'
> test, yet when I run a 'yum upgrade' a large porti
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 7:24 PM, Tom Lanyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Trying to upgrade someone's workstation here to 5.2 (was installed from a
> 5.0 DVD I think).
>
> The RPMs on our internal mirror are in-tact and pass a 'rpm --checksig'
> test, yet when I run a 'yum upgrade' a la
Hi list,
Trying to upgrade someone's workstation here to 5.2 (was installed
from a 5.0 DVD I think).
The RPMs on our internal mirror are in-tact and pass a 'rpm --
checksig' test, yet when I run a 'yum upgrade' a large portion of them
are corrupted and fail the GPG check.
This seems to b
10 matches
Mail list logo
