On Dec 9, 2011, at 11:09 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
>>> All I would ask now is that someone comment on ZFS implementation on
>>> Linux/CentOS.
>>
>> Fuse-ZFS still is at the enthusiast level.
>>
>> I don't know about the other "straight"
Vreme: 12/09/2011 05:09 PM, Les Mikesell piše:
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
>>> All I would ask now is that someone comment on ZFS implementation on
>>> Linux/CentOS.
>>
>> Fuse-ZFS still is at the enthusiast level.
>>
>> I don't know about the other "straight" ports,
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
>>>
>> All I would ask now is that someone comment on ZFS implementation on
>> Linux/CentOS.
>
> Fuse-ZFS still is at the enthusiast level.
>
> I don't know about the other "straight" ports, last I heard they were having
> issues making the VFS l
On Dec 9, 2011, at 7:08 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Vreme: 12/09/2011 03:02 AM, Mikael Fridh piše:
>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>>> Vreme: 12/08/2011 08:31 PM, Alan McKay piše:
>> [...]
>>
wondering if anyone has some recommended reading that is concis
Vreme: 12/09/2011 03:02 AM, Mikael Fridh piše:
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> Vreme: 12/08/2011 08:31 PM, Alan McKay piše:
> [...]
>
>>> wondering if anyone has some recommended reading that is concise and to the
>>> point, and will give me a good intro.
>>
>> I re
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Vreme: 12/08/2011 08:31 PM, Alan McKay piše:
[...]
>> wondering if anyone has some recommended reading that is concise and to the
>> point, and will give me a good intro.
>
> I read this when got interested:
> http://www.funtoo.org/wiki
Vreme: 12/08/2011 08:31 PM, Alan McKay piše:
>> My non-tape solution of choice is definitely rsync => box with ZFS,
>> snapshot however often you'd like. => forever incrementals.
>>
>> For more redundancy and performance, add more ZFS boxes, do
>> replication between them.
>>
>>
>
> Not sure whet
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
>> My non-tape solution of choice is definitely rsync => box with ZFS,
>> snapshot however often you'd like. => forever incrementals.
>>
>> For more redundancy and performance, add more ZFS boxes, do
>> replication between them.
>>
>>
>
> Not sure
> My non-tape solution of choice is definitely rsync => box with ZFS,
> snapshot however often you'd like. => forever incrementals.
>
> For more redundancy and performance, add more ZFS boxes, do
> replication between them.
>
>
Not sure whether ZFS now makes this OT - if so, sorry for not putting
9 matches
Mail list logo
